Lash
Full Member
Seperate point to what I'm making really, we've been undeniably shite in the transfer market.Bit like signing someone for £89m who we let leave for free I suppose.
Seperate point to what I'm making really, we've been undeniably shite in the transfer market.Bit like signing someone for £89m who we let leave for free I suppose.
I'm speaking more in the sense of teams being prepared to enter the market for a player before they have their big break. Enzo Fernandez was available for a fraction of the cost in the summer and none of the big clubs took a chance on him. I don't understand how Chelsea (or whoever else is interested at €120m) can see paying that fee as less of a risk than signing the player directly from River Plate in the summer. He wasn't exactly an unknown talent.
I understand that historically it was because it was difficult to sign players directly from South America, but I don't think that was the case here.
Would they really? If so, what is so special about Chelsea that they weren't?Chelsea are really starting to annoy me. First they got off scot-free for being funded by an oligarch in league with Putin. Most clubs would have been relegated for that.
Yeah, it's basically what soccernomics explained. Eventually there will be a more efficient way found to get these types of players. There's a been a lot of change in ownership recently, so I can't imagine it will stop in the short term mind.I'm speaking more in the sense of teams being prepared to enter the market for a player before they have their big break. Enzo Fernandez was available for a fraction of the cost in the summer and none of the big clubs took a chance on him. I don't understand how Chelsea (or whoever else is interested at €120m) can see paying that fee as less of a risk than signing the player directly from River Plate in the summer. He wasn't exactly an unknown talent.
I understand that historically it was because it was difficult to sign players directly from South America, but I don't think that was the case here.
I meant back in June when Benfica nabbed him.He’s a World Cup winner, young player of the tournament. He’d absolutely get a work permit
Let's be honest if a player signs for a club in the summer and has already forced his way into the midfield of the World Champions and become a key part of their midfield, he was hardly in need of a developmental loan.Now he’s ready and proven to come directly into the team. Coming from South America this wouldn’t have been the case and he’d need to accumulate the minutes to get to where he is now. Quick example look at Amad, we have to send him on loan to get to the level we require.
I just saw CBS and assumed. Where was he before this summer!?He's not American. He's an Englishman from Leicester.
Let's be honest if a player signs for a club in the summer and has already forced his way into the midfield of the World Champions and become a key part of their midfield, he was hardly in need of a developmental loan.
Even if he wasn't ready, are we really saying this 6 months at Benfica is worth the €100m surcharge then? Developing young players is a part of football and clubs pour millions into state of the art training facilities. I'm also not convinced spending that kind of money is conducive to getting the best out of a lot of those players - the added pressure is enormous and most players still require an adjustment period when they sign for a new club.
I just saw CBS and assumed. Where was he before this summer!?
As I've already said in the previous page, the "€100m surcharge" is misleading due to how screwed the Argentine peso is.Let's be honest if a player signs for a club in the summer and has already forced his way into the midfield of the World Champions and become a key part of their midfield, he was hardly in need of a developmental loan.
Even if he wasn't ready, are we really saying this 6 months at Benfica is worth the €100m surcharge then? Developing young players is a part of football and clubs pour millions into state of the art training facilities. I'm also not convinced spending that kind of money is conducive to getting the best out of a lot of those players - the added pressure is enormous and most players still require an adjustment period when they sign for a new club.
Caceido --> Liverpool
Enzo --> Chelsea
Bellingham --> Real
Rice --> United (?)
Works for me. ETH turns Rice into Ince II
I'm not underestimating the value in playing regular football. If it was a case of Enzo Fernandez himself choosing Benfica over other top clubs, fair enough, but there is no evidence that was the case and I doubt he would be jumping ship so soon after if that was a decision he'd made.It’s not that simple. He started on the bench in the World Cup. He moved to a club that offered him playing time. 6 months is a long time to be playing week in and week out improving. Compared to going to Chelsea and waiting your turn between Jorginho, Kovacic and Mount. Add Kante if fit too.. he arguable doesn’t make the World Cup squad.
So what you are stating is something that rarely happens at the highest level unless your Neymar Jr level of talent. Enzo benefited from the move to Benfica and no-one in Europe at the highest level was ready to have Enzo as a first teamer in the summer. Now they are.. and because of this Benfica benefit.
How often do players move from the Argentinian league for 70m? Teenagers from the Brazilian league is a different ball game. I get you're trying to reframe the 130m fee, but it's still astronomical and is only being paid because it's his release clause and Chelsea don't want to risk losing him to another team in the summer. It's a huge overpayment.The only reason he wasn't atleast 70m in the first place is because the Argentine peso is all forms of fecked.
So while "10m to 130m in 6 months" is a nice headline it's a bit misleading (ofcourse i also get the banter aspect to it). if Argentinas economy was even resembling stable he would have cost around what Endrick did, he was very much proven before Benfica.
We've definitely got the short straw there.Caceido --> Liverpool
Enzo --> Chelsea
Bellingham --> Real
Rice --> United (?)
Sounds like a poor excuse to me. The exchange rate might be poor but are you seriously suggesting River Plate have sold two of their top talents for a flat fee in their own currency without accounting for inflation?As I've already said in the previous page, the "€100m surcharge" is misleading due to how screwed the Argentine peso is.
Under normal circumstances he would cost atleast €70m to get out of River (similar to what Madrid had to pay for Endrick). I guess you could maybe say we should have had the foresight to get him from River but he hasn't suddenly shot up €100m in value, circumstances got Benfica a player significantly cheaper than market value, as did City with Alvarez.
Nah Rice is really good, he's evolved his game too with a more progressive style. West Ham seem to be struggling to adapt for him, he's outgrown them and would be an asset in any PL side City included.We've definitely got the short straw there.
Crespo cost €4.13m from River to Parma in 1996, at that point the PL transfer record was just over double that (admittedly about to be smashed to pieces by Shearer) so I'd say that was quite a lot for that time.How often do players move from the Argentinian league for 70m? Teenagers from the Brazilian league is a different ball game. I get you're trying to reframe the 130m fee, but it's still astronomical and is only being paid because it's his release clause and Chelsea don't want to risk losing him to another team in the summer. It's a huge overpayment.
I’ll say it now and I’ll say it again, Rice = McTominay.Nah Rice is really good, he's evolved his game too with a more progressive style. West Ham seem to be struggling to adapt for him, he's outgrown them and would be an asset in any PL side City included.
Quite bullish to post something so daft twiceI’ll say it now and I’ll say it again, Rice = McTominay.
If the players were reversed, we’d be saying the exact same things about both players for both teams. Do not want.
River keeps 25% of Enzo, so maybe the sell will go around 40 millions for River, not bad.As I've already said in the previous page, the "€100m surcharge" is misleading due to how screwed the Argentine peso is.
Under normal circumstances he would cost atleast €70m to get out of River (similar to what Madrid had to pay for Endrick). I guess you could maybe say we should have had the foresight to get him from River but he hasn't suddenly shot up €100m in value, circumstances got Benfica a player significantly cheaper than market value, as did City with Alvarez.
Fair enoughI meant back in June when Benfica nabbed him.
Someone else pointed out if Álvarez got one it should have been fine, but Álvarez had 6 WCQ games for Argentina while Enzo had no caps.
They are literally the same playerQuite bullish to post something so daft twice
The record sale from the Argentinian league is Lautaro Martinez to Inter, who signed for around €25m.Crespo cost €4.13m from River to Parma in 1996, at that point the PL transfer record was just over double that (admittedly about to be smashed to pieces by Shearer) so I'd say that was quite a lot for that time.
I get there's going to a banter aspect especially if he takes a while to acclimatise, all I'm saying is the narrative that his value has jumped €100m in 6 months simply isn't true.
I've never really seen the fuss with Rice. Decent/good player, sure. I don't see our need for him while Casemiro is bossing things.Nah Rice is really good, he's evolved his game too with a more progressive style. West Ham seem to be struggling to adapt for him, he's outgrown them and would be an asset in any PL side City included.
Yeah Cas is huge for us. Almost too big, I would like to see us forward plan in that regard so we dont overly depend on him. On paper him + Rice can operate together, but right now I do enjoy the balance of Eriksen-Casemiro.I've never really seen the fuss with Rice. Decent/good player, sure. I don't see our need for him while Casemiro is bossing things.
Caceido --> Liverpool
Enzo --> Chelsea
Bellingham --> Real
Rice --> United (?)
I'm not underestimating the value in playing regular football. If it was a case of Enzo Fernandez himself choosing Benfica over other top clubs, fair enough, but there is no evidence that was the case and I doubt he would be jumping ship so soon after if that was a decision he'd made.
Julian Alvarez is a better point of comparison than the Amad one you made. City bought him, he went back on loan for the rest of the season and he hasn't been exposed to a lot of first team football for them. He also started the World Cup on the bench, broke in and went on to have a very good tournament. It is possible to identify a talent and sign them if they're good enough. Some players do need a stepping stone club, but equally you don't have to be Neymar to sign directly for a big club from South America.
They are literally the same player
I think West Ham will realize they cant sell him for 100m or over 100m like they suggested before. He'll just run down his contract and without Europa on top they'll have nothing to offer him. He would be comfortably cheaper than Enzo + Bellingham I reckon. Though not cheap as standalone obviously, maybe 80m? I don't know.Putting it like this doesn't really excite me, to say the least. Rice isn't bad, but compared to the others... How much would West Ham want for him? I wouldn't pay a 100M.
McTom is probably slightly better if anything !
But not the player we need at all imo. He‘s good, in his position. But we need an 8 rather than a 6.Nah Rice is really good, he's evolved his game too with a more progressive style. West Ham seem to be struggling to adapt for him, he's outgrown them and would be an asset in any PL side City included.
I get people don’t rate Rice, and he’s massively overpriced, but some of these opinions are bonkers.
I get people don’t rate Rice, and he’s massively overpriced, but some of these opinions are bonkers.