McCool
Winner of the 'Real Caftards Fantasy Football Leag
Harsh.
Would've been gutted if something like that had happened to Colly last week.
Would've been gutted if something like that had happened to Colly last week.
Absolute joke. Australia's only saviour is now the rain.
Other then that, twin double centuries from Clark and North 'far from likely'.
That so, they haven't been that definitive on TMS or maybe i missed it.
However he edged one earlier though for no gain on England's part.
you reckon we can win it by end of the day? im back to work tomorrow after 2 weeks off, so wont be able to watch it
Aye, squeaky bum timeWe could really do with a wicket here, they're getting far to close for my liking.
Frustrating end to the day, still a brilliant position for England. They're 5 down needing over 200, it's still highly unlikely. Great effort though, and they'll be smashing records if they did chase it
Another problem with rejecting the follow on of course, we still have 4 wickets left when we declared in that 2nd innings. If the worst happened, those might have been 4 very precious wickets...
As unlikely as it is, if they score another ton without losing any wickets, it's game on. Aussies were unlucky today, imagine if the decision didn't go England's way. But that's cricket. I still can't see them scoring 522, mind you, the game has changed, in the old days this type of score was unheard of in the final innings - but thanks to flat dead wickets, anything's possible.
Ay true. But then virtually again any last innings run chase is gunna be 'if they score another ton without losing any wickets, it's game on'. As things stand it's still heavily in Englands favour. Lose an early wicket tomorrow and the tail needs to score 200...
Pretty mental they even have a shout mind
Am I the only one who thought we should have added a bit more to our total before declaration?.
Had a look at the stats, the highest 4th innings total (excluding timeless tests, England once made 654 to draw vs Safrica in 1939 3rd March - 14th March ) was in defeat, and made by New Zealand against England, 451 they made
Would you believe the top 4 4th innings scores were all made in defeat?
418 West Indies hold the record for a successful chase. Australia would have to knock another 100+ on that
Yep.
I've been checking the highest fourth innings totals - and the majority of them were scored post 2002. That's insane, and shows us how the game has changed. It's only a matter of time when a team scores 500 in the final innings.
http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/content/records/222199.html
Maybe, there's quite a few innings from the 70's there too, especially in the top 10
Would you not put it more down to how quickly teams are scoring rather than the state of the pitches? A trend you can imagine getting even more pronounced with Twenty20 and the one day game dying on its arse
Frustrating end to the day, still a brilliant position for England. They're 5 down needing over 200, it's still highly unlikely. Great effort though, and they'll be smashing records if they did chase it
Another problem with rejecting the follow on of course, we still have 4 wickets left when we declared in that 2nd innings. If the worst happened, those might have been 4 very precious wickets...
Ay true. But then virtually again any last innings run chase is gunna be 'if they score another ton without losing any wickets, it's game on'. As things stand it's still heavily in Englands favour. Lose an early wicket tomorrow and the tail needs to score 200...
Pretty mental they even have a shout mind
They still should win it but they're at risk of a draw through the weather or even a defeat, both of which were much less likely if they'd enforced the follow on.Frustrating end to the day, still a brilliant position for England. They're 5 down needing over 200, it's still highly unlikely. Great effort though, and they'll be smashing records if they did chase it
Another problem with rejecting the follow on of course, we still have 4 wickets left when we declared in that 2nd innings. If the worst happened, those might have been 4 very precious wickets...
They still should win it but they're at risk of a draw through the weather or even a defeat, both of which were much less likely if they'd enforced the follow on.
how so?
If they had enforced the follow on, Aussies would perhaps have racked up another 300/400 runs before England bowled them out (obviously making massive assumptions here)..
that would leave England with a 200 run or so target on a day 5 pitch, with pressure to get runs quickly..
It would have been highly unlikely that Aussies would have tumbled as they did in their first innings....
Not to mention the England bowlers would probably have been fatigued and tired a bit?
Not following on I feel was a good decision, and has given Australia a massive 500 + target to chase, and 2 full days to bowl them out. Now England not managing to bowl them out is moreso down to their own inability and lack of bowling competence I'd say.