NM
Full Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2011
- Messages
- 12,489
I'm sure the English media will talk about the umpiring today... Oh wait, media everywhere are cnuts and they won't!
I'm sure the English media will talk about the umpiring today... Oh wait, media everywhere are cnuts and they won't!
Nah don’t worry classic England collapse coming I can feel it in my waterEnglish will chase this down easily. Flat pitch and lot of dew.
It's VAR shit all over again innitThat's not what they're looking for. The soft signal was out so they're looking for conclusive evidence to overturn it. I reckon it's possible he could have had his ring fingers behind the ball, but we didn't have the angle that would show that.
Now you ask me how that makes sense for the third umpire to be beholden to the decision made by someone standing 60 metres away. That's the real stupidity.
Nah don’t worry classic England collapse coming I can feel it in my water
It was clearly out apparently even though the umpire looked at like 50 angles but still couldn't get a clear view . The problem with the catches like that is it will forever appear different depending on what team you support.
Nah mate. It appears different if you choose to be blind. The Sundar one was one of those that you can argue (but the right decision was taken due to the soft call), the SKY one was a joke. Hands are open, balls on the ground. It's a shocker.
That's not what they're looking for. The soft signal was out so they're looking for conclusive evidence to overturn it. I reckon it's possible he could have had his ring fingers behind the ball, but we didn't have the angle that would show that.
Now you ask me how that makes sense for the third umpire to be beholden to the decision made by someone standing 60 metres away. That's the real stupidity.
I'm not even sure if you're jinxing or just being pessimist.
You have the best batting lineup in t20. There's dew and a flat pitch.
The right hand was completely out of the equation from the head on view, and the side view confirms that the left wrist and fingers were both angled outwards.
You don't have to see the ball actually touching the ground to be sure. Simply knowing that fingers don't have erections and magically grow three-four inches longer when taking a catch would also suffice.
Let's not blame the rules here. The fielder knew and yet celebrated, and the third umpire made the wrong call.
Pitch isn't doing much - I reckon we're about 20-30 runs below par. I think England will chase this down.
The wrist was, yeah, but the fingers are bent on both hands and it’s possible to have both your ring fingers touch with your wrist angled outwards and a huge gap between your middle and index. We can’t see either of those two fingers at any point and even though I think it’s probably grassed I can see why the third umpire wasn’t sure enough to overturn.
The side view disproves that - it shows that the knuckle of the left ring finger was pointing out as well.
Am I the only one a little unsure about England's bowling attack balance?
Wood, Rashid and Archer will bowl you twelve overs, but I don't think Jordan is good enough to bowl 4 overs a game (he's basically a yorker and nothing else) and Curran and Stokes can both be gotten after too.
Seems to me you're basically playing 3 5th/6th choice bowlers who, ideally, would be bowling about 2 overs per game to make up 8 overs.
Edit: In hindsight, this is less a question of balance and more a question of ‘is Jordan good enough to be a 4th bowler’.
I'd certainly be looking to bring Ali back into the team in place of Jordan.Am I the only one a little unsure about England's bowling attack balance?
Wood, Rashid and Archer will bowl you twelve overs, but I don't think Jordan is good enough to bowl 4 overs a game (he's basically a yorker and nothing else) and Curran and Stokes can both be gotten after too.
Seems to me you're basically playing 3 5th/6th choice bowlers who, ideally, would be bowling about 2 overs per game to make up 8 overs.
Edit: In hindsight, this is less a question of balance and more a question of ‘is Jordan good enough to be a 4th bowler’.
Karma for being a cheating cnut
Third umpire had already said he'd made his decision, but the cameraman still ran him through another angle as if to tell him - can you please not feck up more today, be sure?
Karma for being a cheating cnut
Jordan isn't quite as good as a death bowler as people like to think. The stats also sort of back that up.
https://wisden.com/stories/global-t...20/cricviz-analysis-chris-jordan-death-bowler
I still think this England T20 side has quite a few holes to it as well.
As an RCB fan, this is depressing. Tbf even without this, being an RCB fan is depressing.You can sorta see why MI is such a ridiculous t20 team. Kishan and Sky have looked our best batsman by a mile in two innings.
As an RCB fan, this is depressing. Tbf even without this, being an RCB fan is depressing.
As an RCB fan, this is depressing. Tbf even without this, being an RCB fan is depressing.
Who would you drop Malan for, Tom Banton?
As an RCB fan, this is depressing. Tbf even without this, being an RCB fan is depressing.
His wicket helps England.Karma for being a cheating cnut