England Cricket 2016/17 - Bangladesh, India & West Indies (ODI's only)

Because they've had a coach for two years who talks as if defending is a dirty word and the only way to play cricket is to turn your brain off.
Darren Lehmann is no different. Maybe it's an Aussie thing. The manner of 85 all out said everything about Lehmann, sorry ''Boof's'' shortcoming as a coach.
 
Because they've had a coach for two years who talks as if defending is a dirty word and the only way to play cricket is to turn your brain off.

I hate the "Play your natural game" bs that everyone says. There's a select few players who you could apply that to but for te rest it's just an excuse to throw your wicket away.
 
Not sure how England manage to make getting smashed seem to easy. Even when they are good.
 
Too easy:lol:

Is this the first time a team has lost by more than an innings, despite scoring 450+ in the first innings?:lol:
 
England, by contrast, have slumped like a drunk with sunstroke, defeated for the eighth time in Tests this year - equalling their worst.
 
How do you lose by an innings after scoring close to 500 in the first innings?

This was always going to happen after England's coward declaration in the first test. They had the opportunity to set the benchmark early on but preferred to play for a draw. No way back when you have that kind of mentality against a brutal home team.
 
How do you lose by an innings after scoring close to 500 in the first innings?

This was always going to happen after England's coward declaration in the first test. They had the opportunity to set the benchmark early on but preferred to play for a draw. No way back when you have that kind of mentality against a brutal home team.

England have played poorly but that was not a coward declaration. The pitch was still good to bat on and they wanted to not lose the first test. India could have easily made those runs had they had time.
 
I hope Lehmann and co have been brainstorming ideas on how Australia can give themselves the best opportunity being successful in India early next year. Take the two best spinners, drop Wade and make sure your batsmen are prepared to dig in, bat time and frustrate the Indian bowlers.
 
How do you go from 102/0 at lunch to 207/10 with 45 minutes still to play?
 
Popping onto this thread for my first time in ages to comment on what was even by our standards, a truly spectacular defeat.

A Christmas tradition.
 
England's mentality is so fragile. Unbelievable that we managed to win this.
 
India are ruthless these days. More so than they were under Dhoni.
 
What's the point of sacking Cook, as if that will achieve / mean anything :lol: We're always complete garbage in Asia.
 
India are ruthless these days. More so than they were under Dhoni.

More than captaincy I think it's the management change which worked well. Bangar and Kumble have ensured that Ashwin and Jadeja have found a new level (batting and bowling) and they find talented youngsters (like Karun, Jayant etc.) having actually watched domestic. Players who can actually play test cricket rather than guys like raina and Rohit Sharma who are better equipped for LOI.

A young keeper is probably the next requirement. I'm not completely sold on Parthiv or Saha.

They were at 192/4 too.

Yeah wasting wickets really. Rashid, Ali and all had no reason to be rash

On an absolute road of a wicket no less. Embarrassing.

Exactly and failures for Vijay Kohli Pujara and Ashwin (with the ball at least) and Rahane's absence means 5 of our best players actually were out of the game in their strengths.
 
Seems a lot of home tests. Is that the usual plan?
Between hosting Aus in 2013 and NZ in 2016, India had only two series at home - WI in 2013 (Sachin's farewell) and SA in 2015. They've toured NZ, Australia, England, Bangladesh, West Indies, South Africa and Sri Lanka during this period. This sequence of 13 home tests (3x NZ, 5x Eng, 1x B'desh, 4x Aus) is to balance the away tours and also an initial experiment by BCCI of having an Indian season going similar to how Australia and England host home series traditionally.

Is this the first time a team has lost by more than an innings, despite scoring 450+ in the first innings?:lol:
Previous highest score in first innings before losing a match by innings is 432 by England at Oval in 2001 Ashes. This is a new record as per cricinfo.
 
Oh christ.. I knew we would lose but not like this, left it with Root and Moeen at the crease. What on earth happened?
 
So this Leach guy everyone was banging on about has a dodgy action which is why he wasn't picked.