DOTA
wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
He's a dumb persons idea of a smart person.
I mean...Elon Musk is obviously extremely smart.
I think Zidane's on to something here.obviously he is extremely smart.
He's a dumb persons idea of a smart person.
I mean...Elon Musk is obviously extremely smart.
I think Zidane's on to something here.obviously he is extremely smart.
I think Zidane's on to something here.
Since when do you bite?Ahh right. Well that makes a lot of sense then.
The state of this...
He wants to build a base on Mars and remote control monkey brains.... so yeah bond villain suits himIt has a certain bond villain v Mad Max vibe.
He wants to build a base on Mars and remote control monkey brains.... so yeah bond villain suits him
Raoul was actually a bigger supporter of keeping the name X.com.Since when do you bite?
He has enough money for a hundred lifetimes. Building a base in Mars is not about money. To be fair, he had this mission since he started SpaceX and since then his wealth has increased more than a hundred times.Which will be his demise imo. If he just stuck to Tesla and SpaceX (as in just helping the government send satellites into orbit), he would do much better.
He has enough money for a hundred lifetimes. Building a base in Mars is not about money. To be fair, he had this mission since he started SpaceX and since then his wealth has increased more than a hundred times.
I agree with this. I think that Tesla has had a massive net positive in humanity. Going to Mars on the other hand…let’s just say that there are more pressing concerns.He should stick to things that actually help humans on earth instead of pretending like he's humanity's savior. Tesla is a good good thing and he should work on developing it more.
Nope.I mean...Elon Musk is obviously extremely smart.
SAY IT WITH ME: MUSK NEVER FOUNDED TESLA. HE PAID FOR THE TITLE.To be fair, the number of enterpreuners who have co-founded two companies that reached one billion is very limited. Elon Musk, Twitter’s CEO, Peter Thiel and Steve Jobs . I think the list ends there.
Elon Musk has done this with three companies (four if you count OpenAI where he was a chairman for some time). He is the only person ever, to the best of my knowledge, who has managed to do so. Saying that he is just a good entrepreneur is discrediting him.
And yes, obviously he is extremely smart. Building multi-billion companies is not such an easy task.
He is officially a cofounder. In any case, he took over a baby company which now has over a trillion evaluation and is bigger than the rest of car market combined.SAY IT WITH ME: MUSK NEVER FOUNDED TESLA. HE PAID FOR THE TITLE.
He is officially a cofounder. In any case, he took over a shit company which now has over a trillion evaluation and is bigger than the rest of car market combined.
He is officially a cofounder. In any case, he took over a baby company which now has over a trillion evaluation and is bigger than the rest of car market combined.
SAY IT WITH ME: MUSK NEVER FOUNDED TESLA. HE PAID FOR THE TITLE.
Which sort of says something about him.He is officially a cofounder
Dude, that company had sold 0 cars before he took over. It was a company who had produced nothing and had sold nothing.Please, I beg you, just read something other than Musk's PR. In taking over the company, he paid for the title. He co-founded shit.
Secondly, the fact that a company cannot turn a profit selling cars without government subsidies for carbon credits is worth more than the entire automotive car market combined doesn't show "genius", it shows how fecked the modern economic system is.
I mean, he put his own money in a company who had no revenue and no product, and then did that again in addition to getting money from the other investors. And eventually took over completely and then they started building and selling cars.Which sort of says something about him.
It doesn't matter if he founded it or assumed leadership later. The value proposition of Tesla (namely its electric cars on the road today, as well as the charging infrastructure) were implemented by Musk.
I think Zidane's on to something here.
If you don't think Musk is a smart guy then we fundamentally see it different. Smart doesn't equal decent. He may be an asshole at times, even a manchild, but to say he isn't smart is an odd hill to die on.Nope.
Musk is very much a 'fake it till you make it' pound store Tony Stark.
But that's still a pretty amazing thing to be in the real world. SpaceX is extraordinary, whether it succeeds or fails.
Just listen to him speak for ten minutes.If you don't think Musk is a smart guy then we fundamentally see it different. Smart doesn't equal decent. He may be an asshole at times, even a manchild, but to say he isn't smart is an odd hill to die on.
Having more tunnels underground is a good idea in large cities and electric cars underground make it more of an idea rather than petrol engines if we're going the car route.
Underground tunnels are pretty 1890's though so I'm not quite sure of the Musk revolutionary position on this.
I believe a maximum number of mandates, would have removed Pelosis and Feinsteins a long time ago. I don't like an ageist system, to be fair, and neither feel comfortable when people talk about it (despite being just 30 myself).
Tesla has very little value proposition.
No. Anyone can make something fail.
If you don't think Musk is a smart guy then we fundamentally see it different. Smart doesn't equal decent. He may be an asshole at times, even a manchild, but to say he isn't smart is an odd hill to die on.
Smart isn't just booksmarts. Being effective at sales is a quality on its own. Especially when we're talking the level on which Elon Musk operates, with international investors across nations. He's not exactly selling lemonade around the corner.Not sure how smart he is, but he is a pretty effective salesman.
The cars, are, by and large, awful, crudely built and relied on first mover advantage.Tesla is the world's largest EV maker and make a pretty good car. They also make a comprehensive charging infrastructure for their cars. You have to decouple the car from the owner's personality.
Yeah, pretty much.Smart isn't just booksmarts. Being effective at sales is a quality on its own. Especially when we're talking the level on which Elon Musk operates, with international investors across nations. He's not exactly selling lemonade around the corner.
But I guess dealing with business at a cross-national level, in industries like EV and space, doesn't make you smart because @Murder on Zidane's Floor heard him speak for 10 minutes.
So he was an investor who went on to become CEO. Yet passes himself as a co-founder. Why would someone do that? Why would his role in building the company not be enough for him?I mean, he put his own money in a company who had no revenue and no product, and then did that again in addition to getting money from the other investors. And eventually took over completely and then they started building and selling cars.
I know that Tesla existed before Elon Musk got affiliated with them, but for all practical purposes, they had done nothing before that.
The cars, are, by and large, awful, crudely built and relied on first mover advantage.
They now have given away their leverage against the competition by allowing other car owners to use their chargers.
Now there is no benefit to buying a Tesla (for the network) and putting up with the poor build quality and crap customer service.
Secondly, charging stations queues are becoming a real thing given the time it takes to charge.
Smart isn't just booksmarts. Being effective at sales is a quality on its own. Especially when we're talking the level on which Elon Musk operates, with international investors across nations. He's not exactly selling lemonade around the corner.
But I guess dealing with business at a cross-national level, in industries like EV and space, doesn't make you smart because @Murder on Zidane's Floor heard him speak for 10 minutes.
So he was an investor who went on to become CEO. Yet passes himself as a co-founder. Why would someone do that? Why would his role in building the company not be enough for him?
The whole created and sold nothing at that time doesn't really mean that much when the company itself was started in 2003, had to design and build a car whilst looking for investment.