Elon Musk's epic bacon adventures

Can't imagine the mental gymnastics involved in liking this guy.

Everytime I see something new come out about him I wonder the same thing. Just what sort of person do you have to be in this life to like this guy? He’s such an obnoxious prick.
 
He's a very popular figure in his home state Vermont, and his policies are more popular in his home state compared to rest of the country even amongst democrats.

I know mate, I was being sarcastic (or at least trying). Point is, if he keeps getting elected, then obviously his constituents haven't rejected his policies, like it was suggested.
 
Still early days, but EVs are now starting to take over. One could argue it's been a success, no?

So what if he's an asshole. Loads of people are. I know quite a few, I'm sure you do as well.

At least a little ironic in a thread where 95% +/- is hate, hate, hate.
Well nobody said Tesla isn't successful so far. We're just saying he should pay his fair share of taxes and he is being an asshole with the shit he keeps doing on tweeter such as throwing tantrums about paying taxes.

I agree with this - being uber rich has gone to his head, and he comes across as a dick. But, it's not up to Elon to pay what you think is the fair share of taxes, he's got to pay what's the legal amount. If Congress determines it's too little, they have the power to adjust it and they should do it. Everything else is grandstanding by both Elon and Bernie.
Do you think it's right that Elon pays less taxes than the average american?

Do you honestly believe that congress will actually do what the majority of americans want them to do as opposed to accepting bribes from lobbyist groups to block any legislation that their benefactors don't want them to pass?
 
Because their proposal is a) insane and harmful to the economy b) rejected repeatedly at the polls by the majority of Muricans.

For point a), we are running at 6.2% official CPI inflation, which means the real figure is probably low double digits. Printing more money in this scenario is insane. We have been printing non-stop since March 2020, it's time to rein it in, this $10 Trillion agenda is insane. And b) Americans defeated Bernie at the polls and recently showed what they think of the Progressivist agenda, so time for them to take a hike.
Jesus christ. This just keeps getting better and better.
 
I know mate, I was being sarcastic (or at least trying). Point is, if he keeps getting elected, then obviously his constituents haven't rejected his policies, like it was suggested.
Fair enough.

Another point to note is his ideas aren't exactly unpopular even across the nation, the biggest issue is that he does not know how to get his message across to a wider group of people.
 
Well nobody said Tesla isn't successful so far. We're just saying he should pay his fair share of taxes and he is being an asshole with the shit he keeps doing on tweeter such as throwing tantrums about paying taxes.
Of course not. This is tech we want and need more of, fast, hence governments subsidizing it. He got rich/er off something/s we really, really need. If he's not paying the taxes he's supposed to, I'm sure the US tax office will have a word. Whether or not he should pay more taxes, I don't know. I hope he spends his fortune wisely. Asshole or not.
 
Everything is from taxation, the only question is if it's from current taxation or future (i.e. borrowing). The Fed decides whether or not to print, and it's not to fund state expenditures.

what do you call it when a bill authorises more spending without a tax increase, given that the US runs deficits? genuinely asking.

in my head, i would call that printing money. lots of people who believe in MMT say that, for example, the US can just do infrastructure or medicare for all without raising taxes, just by borrowing/printing. to me that sounds like dangerous BS because you're going to either default or face inflation.
otoh, bernie's infrastructure bill, at least at the start, had roughly equal taxation and new spending.
 
Lots of interesting stuff in your post!
First, his bill relied largely on taxation, rather than printing money. Not sure how much taxation is left in it after Manchin/Sinema opposed every type of tax, but then they also cut spending by more than half.
So, instead of your $10tn (which it never was), it's gone from 6tn (his opening bid) to 3.5tn (his compromise) to 1.5tn (now), and with a strong prospect of further cuts or total abandonment. So, if he gets his way, it's 15% of what you claimed, and it's over 10 years, and some of which is from new revenue rather than printed... you're playing *really* loose with numbers for a Wall Street guy!

Next, he, Manchin, Trump, Biden, all have constituencies. Trump lost but has not fecked off and is doing a good job of leading his constituency of energy companies, small business, religious people, and suburban and middle-aged/old people. Bernie too has a constituency which it's his job to represent (though I don't think he's doing a good job) - young people and unions. Manchin's constituency is West Virginia centrists, pharma companies, and coal mining companies and ex-workers. He is great at representing them. Sinema represents Arizona centrists, pharma, energy, and small business. Also a great leader for them.
Just because Trump lost, or because Bernie/Sinema/Manchin aren't the leader of their party, they should vanish? No, they represent permanent interests, larger than an election.

This is a thoughtful response, so I'll try to engage thoughtfully.

We are in an inflationary environment - the current CPI is 6.2%, which means the real inflation, the one felt at the pump, at the grocery store etc it's probably low double digits. Inflation is too much money chasing to few goods/services. On the supply side, we've got shortages in the production and delivery of goods and services - there's labor shortages, we are paying people not to work, ports are backed up - on the demand side we have an unprecedented monetary and fiscal expansion; $1.9T of Covid relief, $1.2T of infrastructure, Biden's been talking about another $2.2T of social welfare, Fed has been continuing to print money with QE since March 2020 (roughly $80B/mo TRSY purchases and $40B/month in MBS purchases or $1.5T a year since March 2020). Add it all up and tell me how we pay for it?

Total Public Debt
Debt-to-GDP ratio
Labor Shortage

Is what Bernie/AOC pushing for good for the country? It's good for their constituents, but not the country overall. Bernie's agenda failed at the presidential polls. The progressives agenda got killed in the midterms. In my opinion, all of this spending - regardless of labels, Dems/GOP/Progressive/Centrist - is reckless, unsustainable and it's going to wreck the economy. Washington needs to slow the printing machine, and end the disincentives for production and work.

Since this is the Elon thread - it's interesting he's selling so much stock. Is this the top?
 
Well, why is not in the WH? He ran for President twice, he lost. Biden won on a centrist agenda, he should call the shots.

I thought in a democracy people who lose presidential elections but are still elected to other positions should defend what their constituents want, but maybe you're right, maybe they should just feck off.
 
Since this is the Elon thread - it's interesting he's selling so much stock. Is this the top?

Its definitely not the top. It could double over the next couple of years since he still hasn't yet released the Model 2, which will be a mass produced EV in the $25k range that he will drop probably next year. The Model 2 / Model 3 combo could do for Tesla what the iPhone did for Apple. At that point, he will have a firm grip on each of the budget, mid priced, and luxury EV market, as well as the charging infrastrcture to support them all.
 
what do you call it when a bill authorises more spending without a tax increase, given that the US runs deficits? genuinely asking.

in my head, i would call that printing money. lots of people who believe in MMT say that, for example, the US can just do infrastructure or medicare for all without raising taxes, just by borrowing/printing. to me that sounds like dangerous BS because you're going to either default or face inflation.
otoh, bernie's infrastructure bill, at least at the start, had roughly equal taxation and new spending.

Glad you mentioned MMT, because I find their policy recommendations insane. The elephant in the room is spiraling inflation and how to prevent it becoming a stagflation.

Raising rates might do the trick. The weighted average maturity for US debt is 65 months (just over 5 yrs), which means that debt has to get rolled over soon. Raise rates to combat inflation and the cost of servicing debt will take a huge chunk of the Federal Budget very soon. I've read estimates that depending where rates rise to, servicing the debt would take up to 30% of the Federal Budget. Right now is something like 2%. If only Yellen and her MMT pals agreed to lengthen the maturity of government debt before interest rates rise we wouldn't be in such a pickle.

Increase revenue through taxation is another way - whether it's through higher taxes on corporations and/or citizens. Federal corporate tax rate is 21%, adding state tax rates you're looking at anywhere from 21-30%. France by comparison is at 26.5%, Germany is 15% (if my memory is correct; though there may be a solidarity surcharge). Point being the corporate rate is relatively high, there's not much juice to squeeze there. Big corporations can and will leave. Increase tax revenue from the people, that's going to be very popular and political suicide for anyone trying it (I'm not talking selective billionaire tax, I'm talking raising rates on the middle class).

Cutting spending is yet another way and we've seen where gov't spending is highest like defense, healthcare and education where costs spiral out of control. Don't see it happening though, especially with lots of politicians advocating increasing spending.

Or we could start a war - that usually stimulates the economy and WWII famously got us out of the Depression era funk...
 
Its definitely not the top. It could double over the next couple of years since he still hasn't yet released the Model 2, which will be a mass produced EV in the $25k range that he will drop probably next year. The Model 2 / Model 3 combo could do for Tesla what the iPhone did for Apple. At that point, he will have a firm grip on each of the budget, mid priced, and luxury EV market, as well as the charging infrastrcture to support them all.
I looked at this and thought "hmm, might be worth jumping on that sweet Tesla gravy train", realised shares at a grand a pop, felt sick, and searched for NIO instead.
 
I thought in a democracy people who lose presidential elections but are still elected to other positions should defend what their constituents want, but maybe you're right, maybe they should just feck off.

He's a Senator from Vermont, a state where cows outnumber people. His constituents are 200,000 farmers and rich New Yorkers who buy a second home in Burlington. The country is 320 million people.

Look, I respect Bernie and I think he's the most trustworthy and upright person in Congress. I would have voted for him in the general election in 2016 or 2020. The fact of the matter is Biden won. On a centrist agenda. So he gets to govern on that agenda.

US is a winner takes all country, it's a different system than most European countries with proportional votes and coalitions and what not.

feck it, I've been sitting on this plane for 4 hours time to land and do some real work...
 
what do you call it when a bill authorises more spending without a tax increase, given that the US runs deficits? genuinely asking.

in my head, i would call that printing money. lots of people who believe in MMT say that, for example, the US can just do infrastructure or medicare for all without raising taxes, just by borrowing/printing. to me that sounds like dangerous BS because you're going to either default or face inflation.
otoh, bernie's infrastructure bill, at least at the start, had roughly equal taxation and new spending.

Without wanting to open an economic can of worms, just a quick point about the theory behind MMT.

You won't default (unless you consciously choose to) because you print the currency your debt is denominated in.

You won't get hyperinflation because firstly it's pretty hard to cause hyperinflation unless you're actively trying to, and secondly, the money you're printing is generating new economic activity (e.g. Green New deal, new jobs, more tax take etc), so you don't get too much money chasing too few products.


...or so the theory goes, anyway.
 
I dunno - the value if a stock is determined by the market and I think most shares are owned by Musk / financial institutions - and you would think their buying decisions are not made on musks followers

I thin Vanguard and Blackrock are among the companies invested who increased holdings recently for example

Personally Im not sure how thery arrived at the valuation (presumably they think the vertical integration and head start in battery tech is worth what seems to be a hefty premium but I dont think its musks antics and clut like following thats driving their decisions)
Vanguard and Blackrock for most part do passive indexing. So if the value of a company increases they have to buy more of that stock.

I think that Tesla’s stocks are massively overpriced though. But it is nothing new, these things happen all the time until they get corrected.
 
That channel :lol:

Celebrity worship to new levels.

Paying attention to the content, not the content provider

This guy is off his meds:



NASA has spent $360 Billion on its program and didn't have a way to go to space... until SpaceX came along and did it for $12B after profits.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
That's a slightly weird way to phrase it, because Musk isn't actually a rocket scientist in any way. He might know more about space exploration, but running a space exploration company filled with rocket scientists doesn't make him an expert on rocket science.

In any case, there are some obvious concerns with privatizing space exploration and colonization.
 
Paying attention to the content, not the content provider

This guy is off his meds:



NASA has spent $360 Billion on its program and didn't have a way to go to space... until SpaceX came along and did it for $12B after profits.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Bernie is like a broken record. In general, doing the opposite of what he says tends to be a good policy.
 
If he was eligible I have no doubt he'd be running for president. Clearly has the ego for it.
 
He is also cool

Fcuking hell. This may be the dumbest thing I’ve ever read. Have you met any other humans?

Edit : Just saw this was from 2017. My statement remains. Apologies for quoting a younger you though.
 
Fcuking hell. This may be the dumbest thing I’ve ever read. Have you met any other humans?

Edit : Just saw this was from 2017. My statement remains. Apologies for quoting a younger you though.

Wow, really @UnrelatedPsuedo Out of all the horseshit you've read in your entire lifespan that particular sentence was the dumbest you've ever read? Hyperbole much.
 
GettyImages-1229892421.jpg