I don't get this at all. He has so much money (and to many) brains, surely he doesn't need to be attractive too? Yet he spends some of it on becoming this. As if it fooled anyone.How much work has he had done? Waxy cnut.
He predicted the pandemic would be over in May 2020. Isn’t that good enough for you?How much work has he had done? Waxy cnut.
What I don't understand is that no one has twigged that rarely do you ever look better after cosmetic surgery. Obviously I'm not talking about people who've had work done to cover up scars etc but people who do it for vanity reasons. It just doesn't really work so I don't get why people do it.I don't get this at all. He has so much money (and to many) brains, surely he doesn't need to be attractive too? Yet he spends some of it on becoming this. As if it fooled anyone.
Then again this is true for 95% of people in the public eye. I just don't understand why.
My guess is that when they do look better as a result we just don't notice anything was done at all. I just feel it's odd that someone of his stature and accomplishments should feel it necessary, but I guess that's the world we live in.What I don't understand is that no one has twigged that rarely do you ever look better after cosmetic surgery. Obviously I'm not talking about people who've had work done to cover up scars etc but people who do it for vanity reasons. It just doesn't really work so I don't get why people do it.
Sandra Bullock has done well I think. She looks amazing for her age and I doubt it's all natural.What I don't understand is that no one has twigged that rarely do you ever look better after cosmetic surgery. Obviously I'm not talking about people who've had work done to cover up scars etc but people who do it for vanity reasons. It just doesn't really work so I don't get why people do it.
Beg to differ.It's never Dave or Sandra from down the road.
That's a cop-out!
1966... all americans under 25It's never Dave or Sandra from down the road.
To be fair they should probably make more awards like that as time person of the year has such luminaries as Hitler, Stalin and Ayatollah Khomeini
Bezos won it years ago I seeThat's why this didn't bother me. Not because he's as bad as Hiter - let's give him time - but because it's not technically supposed to be a positive thing. Though it often is.
I guess because they gave it to the crew of Apollo 8 in 1968 for orbiting the moonCrazy how the first men on the moon didn't get a look in.
Stalin got 2.1966... all americans under 25
therefore any americans born between 1941 and 1966... so anybody who is between 55 and 80... whts that 20% of the popultion?... so plenty of Daves and Sandras
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Person_of_the_Year
To be fair they should probably make more awards like that as time person of the year has such luminaries as Hitler, Stalin and Ayatollah Khomeini
what an amazing poster totally "with it" as the kids say.
How any adult can look up to this man-baby is such a mystery to me.
what an amazing poster totally "with it" as the kids say.
what an amazing poster totally "with it" as the kids say.
what an amazing poster totally "with it" as the kids say.
At some point it is going to drop. Or else Musk is going to be the Overlord in a dystopian future. Tesla can't keep growing like it has, it's just maybe impossible to say when it'll stop.
To be fair, he is just replied to eternal critics like Warren or Sanders who just bark but never offer anything useful.He's fully embraced being a cnut.
what an amazing poster totally "with it" as the kids say.
To be fair, he is just replied to eternal critics like Warren or Sanders who just bark but never offer anything useful.
In what aspect he is a tax avoider?They suggest legislation that forces tax avoiders like Musk to pay their fair share. How is that not offering something useful?
In what aspect he is a tax avoider?
They never suggest anything useful. They just criticize and play populism.
He is not though. Despite that this belief from some people that people should pay taxes in unrealized gains.He's definitely a tax avoider. Whether he's a tax evader is harder to say.
In any case, saying that Warren and Sanders "just criticize and play populism" is honestly absurd. Sanders in particular has a decades long career as a politician. The fact that he doesn't have the support to enact his agenda in no way means that he's not allowed to promote that agenda.
It's telling that you're choosing that obviously childish and inane tweet to defend Musk. Is there anything he could do that you wouldn't back up?