Donkai Havertz | Arsenal Watch

Where will he even play?

Also, I'm not sure there is any evidence to suggest Arteta has yet improved Jesus as a player (incidentally, that's who I'm assuming Havertz will have to compete with).

I guess he can compete with Jesus for ST(better option than Nketiah surely) or he can play CAM when needed. Even on the wing would be a possibility.
I believe Arteta is trying to build a better squad, with a couple of subs at the level of the starters (see what Pep does)
 
I think he'll look a much better player in a coherent attacking team.

With Nkunku it really didn't make sense to keep him.
 
I think he'll look a much better player in a coherent attacking team.

With Nkunku it really didn't make sense to keep him.
Just don‘t play him as a sole #9: problem solved (it‘s just a bonus that he can play there if every other option is injured/out of form). Agreed about Nkunku (who imho also looks better alongside a true striker so let‘s see about that).

Without Musiala and Wirtz in the pipeline for next year I think Bayern would have gone more serious after him.
 
Ødegaard - Rice - Havertz feels really attacking heavy. They will blitz teams no doubt but I can see them being ocassionaly destroyed too (ala Brighton).
 
Quite interested to see what Havertz brings to our left and right 8 positions. He definitely has the intelligence, movement and energy to be very dynamic for us there.

Having two creative players as our 8s would mean that we would need 5 defensive players on the pitch, to help with our defensive organisation. So I see us going for 5 defenders, with the ability to become midfielders. This would be good for us against more physical, counter attack teams or teams who hold the ball better than we do.

Against teams who arent as good, we can go with Zinchenko or Timber as one of our fullbacks.
 
Ødegaard - Rice - Havertz feels really attacking heavy. They will blitz teams no doubt but I can see them being ocassionaly destroyed too (ala Brighton).

It's about getting the balance right tactically.

City used to regularly play a midfield 3 of Fernandinho, De Bruyne and David Silva in the Centurions season and they coped.

I don't think it's as simple as plopping Havertz in Xhakas position without any adjustments tactically. He knows we struggled at times defensively on the transition so I'm sure he's looking to make some tweaks.

I'm intrigued to see with Timber probably coming in as well what he's thinking about tactically. Will he continue to invert Zinchenko, will it be Timber that inverts as he might be better defensively with Rice in the midfield, or will he try and go for the box midfield?

Like you say though, there's always the chance it knocks the balance off, will be fascinating to watch.
 
Ødegaard - Rice - Havertz feels really attacking heavy. They will blitz teams no doubt but I can see them being ocassionaly destroyed too (ala Brighton).

Also interesting that Ten Hag seems to be going for a similar set-up with Casemiro/Mount/Bruno.
 
Very poor player. Arteta will be in for a shock if he's the Xhaka replacement. Can't see him sending Jesus to the bench. He's neither build for the Premier League nor got the necessary skill for a top team. There will be no place to hide for him, too expensive. Could be the beginning of the end for Arteta.

This will age horribly
 
Also interesting that Ten Hag seems to be going for a similar set-up with Casemiro/Mount/Bruno.
That's very attacking line up. But many people don't understand it's lower mid table teams decide who will finish better position.

Against those teams that line up of midfield will give you so many goals. If score two three goals against those teams you will not worry much about odd slip and ship in one goal here and there.Havertz and mount both played as forward players for us.

I don't know how Kai havertz will be effective in midfield. Many Bundesliga cafe members think he will be very good in that position. But whatever I saw in him when he played for chelsea when he was put under pressure he often lost possession.

Compared to havertz mount has the characters to play in midfield. He is strong in possession and rarely lose ball in possession. Able to carry the ball in crowded area. Good passer long and short.Highest number of chance creator.
 
Very poor player. Arteta will be in for a shock if he's the Xhaka replacement. Can't see him sending Jesus to the bench. He's neither build for the Premier League nor got the necessary skill for a top team. There will be no place to hide for him, too expensive. Could be the beginning of the end for Arteta.
This will be prophetic.
 
Also interesting that Ten Hag seems to be going for a similar set-up with Casemiro/Mount/Bruno.
In your system I would play him on the right side of a 4231 with a different CM signed to play next to Casemiro medium/long term.

That midfield three would probably be the worst in possesion out of the big teams.
 
That's very attacking line up. But many people don't understand it's lower mid table teams decide who will finish better position.

Against those teams that line up of midfield will give you so many goals. If score two three goals against those teams you will not worry much about odd slip and ship in one goal here and there.Havertz and mount both played as forward players for us.

I don't know how Kai havertz will be effective in midfield. Many Bundesliga cafe members think he will be very good in that position. But whatever I saw in him when he played for chelsea when he was put under pressure he often lost possession.

Compared to havertz mount has the characters to play in midfield. He is strong in possession and rarely lose ball in possession. Able to carry the ball in crowded area. Good passer long and short.Highest number of chance creator.

Also, bear in mind when you are talking about our left 8 last season, Xhaka was often pushed very high and it was Zinchenko and Partey that was used to help build up the play in the middle park. It's how we maneuver everyone out of possession that will be key, and I'm intrigued what he has in mind for that.
 
Also, bear in mind when you are talking about our left 8 last season, Xhaka was often pushed very high and it was Zinchenko and Partey that was used to help build up the play in the middle park. It's how we maneuver everyone out of possession that will be key, and I'm intrigued what he has in mind for that.

Guessing it's a 4-4-2 out of possession - Odegaard presumably dropping deeper. Rice next to him would help somewhat as I think he's significantly more mobile than Partey at this point.
 
This will age horribly
This will be prophetic.
We'll see.

When was the last time a big player for a big team who played quite poorly before his transfer, got his move and turned things around? I remember the likes of Torres, Falcao, Sanchez and so on, it didn't end well at all for the new club.
 
We'll see.

When was the last time a big player for a big team who played quite poorly before his transfer, got his move and turned things around? I remember the likes of Torres, Falcao, Sanchez and so on, it didn't end well at all for the new club.

A little unfair. He’s been Chelsea’s best forward player in a dogshit and disassociated team. Not the worst player in a great team.

He’s been performing. Few players alongside him have turned up.

But yeah. I reckon he’s going to be a sensation. You don’t. I’ll buy you a virtual pint if he’s a disaster.
 
What's the deal here, has he been played out of position for Chelsea this whole time and he's actually a midfielder?

Bringing in a striker who's mostly flopped to play alongside Odegaard in midfield seems a bit of a risk.
 
Also, bear in mind when you are talking about our left 8 last season, Xhaka was often pushed very high and it was Zinchenko and Partey that was used to help build up the play in the middle park. It's how we maneuver everyone out of possession that will be key, and I'm intrigued what he has in mind for that.
For havertz,the first touch is great. But he has always had trouble to control the ball in crowded area. This is what keep him from being world class in football.

If you create enough time and space for him to operate he can fulfil his potential and become world class.

His lean frame and height make it difficult for him to fully control the ball due to higher center of gravity. Naturally he will be in disadvantage when struggle to control the ball with opponents pressing him. Will be interesting to see how arsenal utilise him.
 
Saliba - Gabriel
Timber - Rice - Zinchenko
Odegaard - Havertz
Saka - Jesus - Martinelli
The 5 - 5 formation with Rice playing as a false CB in to a back 3 out of possesion & 2 inverted fullbacks.

I think this is Arteta’s plan for Havertz & Rice.
 
What's the deal here, has he been played out of position for Chelsea this whole time and he's actually a midfielder?

Bringing in a striker who's mostly flopped to play alongside Odegaard in midfield seems a bit of a risk.

I wouldn't call it out of position since he had a very successful albeit short spell for us as a false 9 towards the end of his time here and Flick and Löw also played him like this regularly.

But he was mostly a 8/10 hybrid for us, occasionally even part of a two men midfield. It's understandable that coaches tried him out there because a) he possesses many of the required attributes (eye for goal, great technique, timing in the box, height, heading) and b) the teams he played had an abundance of midfielders but no quality strikers.

But I'm excited for this move, not going to lie. It will be the first time that he will be played in a similar team setup and role in which he excelled for us.
 
Saliba - Gabriel
Timber - Rice - Zinchenko
Odegaard - Havertz
Saka - Jesus - Martinelli
The 5 - 5 formation with Rice playing as a false CB in to a back 3 out of possesion & 2 inverted fullbacks.

I think this is Arteta’s plan for Havertz & Rice.

Yes, this you have done, is likely to be one of our setups.

Teams who look to keep it tigher, be physical and look for space behind, particularly behind Zinchenko and Timber, will love your setup though. So against those teams we need defenders in those positions. So I'd replace Timber for Partey and Zinchenko for Kiwior/Tomiyasu or Tierney if he stays. Which is an actual 5-5 formation, or 5-5 profile split (5 defenders - 5 attackers).

So something like this...

----------------Ramsdale
White---Saliba--Gabriel---Tomiyasu
--------------------Rice
----------Odegaard--Havertz
Saka-----------Jesus----------Martinelli

In possession...

----------Saliba---Gabriel--Tomiyasu
-----------------White-----Rice
------------Odegaard---Havertz
Saka---------------Jesus-----------------Martinelli

You could replace White with Partey, and instruct Thomas to vary his movement based on in game requirements, as White does. We did see Partey play on that right side in the last games of 22/23.
 
Last edited:
For havertz,the first touch is great. But he has always had trouble to control the ball in crowded area. This is what keep him from being world class in football.

If you create enough time and space for him to operate he can fulfil his potential and become world class.

His lean frame and height make it difficult for him to fully control the ball due to higher center of gravity. Naturally he will be in disadvantage when struggle to control the ball with opponents pressing him. Will be interesting to see how arsenal utilise him.

Think this is why I'm underwhelmed if he's bought in purely to play as a forward.

When you watch his best bits on YouTube, and you hear how he describes how he likes to play, he seems to be much better at arriving into the box from late, not being the actual focal point in the box.

He seemed to get a high percentage of his goals for Leverkusen from 15-20 yards out arriving late and finishing first time from cut backs. That's why I'm much more intrigued to see him as an advanced 8 rather than an actual number 9.
 
he is, although i think he also have looked really good for madrid, too

I think he could have been a good Benzema replacement. In principal, he's suited for the false 9 role but he really needs the right setup. Benzema doesn't play as a target striker either but moved very fluidly and especially has overlapping runners to his left and right that he can bring in play. Their statistics also read very similar in the build up and creation stuff.

Anyway, as a Chelsea fan I'd be a bit worried that many players are expected to look better in other teams. There's so much talent in this squad but somehow the club struggles to unlock it.
 
"Many players"? Its only Havertz where people are saying this, isn't it?

I can't really think of any attacking player that lived up to his reputation when he joined you. Ziyech, Joao Felix, Mudryk, Sterling, Lukaku, Werner, Pulisic, ... they all kind of underperformed. Many of them not completely terrible but still didn't really live up to the expectations?
 
I can't really think of any attacking player that lived up to his reputation when he joined you. Ziyech, Joao Felix, Mudryk, Sterling, Lukaku, Werner, Pulisic, ... they all kind of underperformed. Many of them not completely terrible but still didn't really live up to the expectations?

Torres as well. Maybe Shevchenko.
 
I can't really think of any attacking player that lived up to his reputation when he joined you. Ziyech, Joao Felix, Mudryk, Sterling, Lukaku, Werner, Pulisic, ... they all kind of underperformed. Many of them not completely terrible but still didn't really live up to the expectations?

Drogba did fine.
 
Saliba - Gabriel
Timber - Rice - Zinchenko
Odegaard - Havertz
Saka - Jesus - Martinelli
The 5 - 5 formation with Rice playing as a false CB in to a back 3 out of possesion & 2 inverted fullbacks.

I think this is Arteta’s plan for Havertz & Rice.
5-5 formation. What is this madness? It must be a bare minimum of 3 numbers?! Has everything I’ve learned been a lie?!
 

I am just going to leave this here


Yeah but Torres should have been in his prime. Havertz was a young kid who needed time. Torres was also playing in a MUCH better team. It's a silly comparison with no nuance or context.
 

I am just going to leave this here


I'm not sure of the relevance though. Torres is number 9 who should have scored a lot more goals that he did for Chelsea.

Take away the comparison and the Havertz stats look okay regardless. Nothing special, but decent for an attacking midfielder.
 
5-5 formation. What is this madness? It must be a bare minimum of 3 numbers?! Has everything I’ve learned been a lie?!

Pep used a 5-5 formation this year;

but he had CB fullbacks that would shift in to a 3 and Stones that would play in midfield during possession.

So in possesion they had 5 at the back & 5 at the front able to attack.

Rice likely would do the opposite to stones at Arsenal where he moves to a 3rd CB from dropping down from midfield except if he actually moved to City, where he would play as the False CB stones is that progresses the ball in to midfield during attack from deep.
 
Pep used a 5-5 formation this year;

but he had CB fullbacks that would shift in to a 3 and Stones that would play in midfield during possession.

So in possesion they had 5 at the back & 5 at the front able to attack.

Rice likely would do the opposite to stones at Arsenal where he moves to a 3rd CB from dropping down from midfield except if he actually moved to City, where he would play as the False CB stones is that progresses the ball in to midfield during attack from deep.

No he didn't..

Rodri and Stones were ahead of the defenders so it was a 3-2 -4-1 rather than a 5 - 5 formation.
 
I can't really think of any attacking player that lived up to his reputation when he joined you. Ziyech, Joao Felix, Mudryk, Sterling, Lukaku, Werner, Pulisic, ... they all kind of underperformed. Many of them not completely terrible but still didn't really live up to the expectations?
Plenty of underperforming players for sure. I thought you meant players who were "expected to look better in other teams", which I've only really noticed being said about Havertz.

When Werner or Lukaku were missing sitters left and right, nobody was saying they'd look better at Arsenal.
 
A little unfair. He’s been Chelsea’s best forward player in a dogshit and disassociated team. Not the worst player in a great team.
While I do think there's a chance he will be good at Arsenal this is a dangerous route to go down.

Last time we had a season like this you guys gave the benefit of the doubt the manager was the least of our problems and that didn't end too well.
 
I can't really think of any attacking player that lived up to his reputation when he joined you. Ziyech, Joao Felix, Mudryk, Sterling, Lukaku, Werner, Pulisic, ... they all kind of underperformed. Many of them not completely terrible but still didn't really live up to the expectations?
Pulisic (all be it for an extreme short period) played better with us than he ever did at Dortmund and probably ever will again.

Lukaku hasn't looked any better for his new team and neither will Felix.