GoonerBear
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2020
- Messages
- 3,740
- Supports
- Arsenal
Is, was and never will be a striker. The second he was bought to play that role, even as a wannabe Firmino, I knew Arteta was bonkers.
He wasn't bought to be a striker, he was bought to play as an attacking midfielder, he was meant to be a 'box crasher' from the left 8 position, but a mixture of him being shite and the striker being shite meant he got moved up front where he found some form.
I think Arteta thought he can be a more attacking replacement of Xhaka, offering more of a goal threat, and try and rediscover some of his Leverkusen form, but he looks a different player from those days, lost a bit of skill and dynamism that could take him away from the opposing player, but the midfield just doesn't function as well with him in it.
Where do you fit him in then? Because he sure as hell can't be an effective midfielder. Almost every single one of his best games in 5 seasons in England have been up front. He's an inconsistent finisher, that's 100% obvious but he's still got 15 goals in 34 games. He's averaging roughly 1 in 2 in every comp Arsenal have played in this season. It's shaping up to be by far the most productive season of his entire career.
So yes, he's had a couple of high profile misses in a couple of big games recently, but most teams would be happy with that kind of production from their striker. They can and probably should look for a better striker in the summer, but the biggest problem with Arsenal's attack isn't Havertz imo. He's the least of their problems. It's their wide forwards Trossard and Martinelli, and surprisingly, Odegaard has been very very bad since his return from injury, bar a game or two initially.
He effectively should be a £65M, £280k a week squad player to be honest.