People are all too quick to handily label his first 2 seasons as simply bad, it's too easy. I remember at several various points after about his first 3 months, where I heard: "now we're seeing the real Berbatov, this is why we bought him, etc." The revisionism is especially bizarre regarding his second season, where he was very good up until Rooney's injury, had a poor last 8 games or so and that's what his season was remembered for.
Now we have a situation where people are so annoyed that he's proving them wrong (those who wanted him sold in particular), that they are pretty much inventing reasons to have a go at him. It's all a bit sad really.
Interesting to note that in Tévez's first season, which is generally regarded as a success, he created or scored every 134 minutes, whilst Berbatov's first season, which is generally regarded as a failure, he created or scored every 135 minutes. Who knew the cut-off point for a successful season was to create or score every 134 minutes and one second?