GlastonSpur
Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2007
- Messages
- 17,716
- Supports
- Spurs
Ha. Ok. So it's "all games that Dembele started, oh except for that one where he started as an attacking midfielder. I'm not counting that one because it goes against the bizarre criteria I am trying to prove."
I get you.
And I disagree. "Title winning form" becomes meaningless if it didn't result in actually winning the title. How can it be title winning form? Title challenging form, perhaps. But Spurs bottled it and came 3rd. Nobody associated with Spurs was in title winning form. If anyone has title winning form, it is Pogba, seeing as the Alli thread has become the Pogba vs Dembele and the skewed stats thread. He won 4 in a row as a key player in that side, and that doesn't need to be backed by some obtuse stat that conveniently greys out certain games/results.
It's like saying a player put in a match winning performance, but lost the game. There's a reason why that doesn't happen. Because it's dumb as feck.
It's not "bizarre criteria" - it's statement of statistical fact that reflects just how important Dembele was to Spurs in CM last season and illustrates why Pogba would not, as claimed, just automatically "stroll in" and displace him.
And even if you wish to include the only game that Spurs lost when Dembele started - even tho' he didn't play in CM in that game - it hardly affects the overall picture painted by those stats.
As for the rest, OK, I shall look with interest to see you challenging - because it doesn't fit with your pedantic criteria - every poster who has ever used the phrase "title winning form".