simmee
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2012
- Messages
- 943
Matic is better on the ball than Rice will ever be.
Better passer, better dribbler and better shooting technique. Not really a contest between those two...
Matic is better on the ball than Rice will ever be.
Declan Rice is basically Matic in his prime. If James Garner grows as expected (I view him as a Kroos-type of player), we will have a prime Matic-Kroos midfield pair for the next decade.
Yup, minus the ability on the ball.Declan Rice is basically Matic in his prime. If James Garner grows as expected (I view him as a Kroos-type of player), we will have a prime Matic-Kroos midfield pair for the next decade.
Lots of people are missing the point, lets not compare him to Matic in his prime, the only question you have to ask yourself is simply is he better than Fred or Scott? If so he'll make our team better.
Yes they're probably better people out there but 1 step at a time.
I respect your view but you just can't compare rice to makelele. May be both defensive midfielders. That's the only similarity between those two. He was totally different league compared to rice.The guy is Makelele.
The guy makes the rest of the team play better, it gives the team a shape; a freedom to do as you please.
He stops the channels and the passing capabilities of the opposition before they even get the foot on the ball.
I just think that a player like him isn’t exactly easy to find - even if we need that new version of Carrick - I don’t see why we should bypass that new version of Makelele.
The Bruno Fernandes, Pogba, Fred and possibly VDB Hannibal and Garner doesn’t really highlight the need for more creativity as the thing we need the most in my opinion - we need that ability to have our creative players play with a freedom higher up the pitch with ease.
£50M+Lingard is a no-brainer for me.
Lingard is worth at least £20m. That's an abomination not a deal.
He was all over the place at the beginning and they ran straight through him for the huge Werner chance. He could also have been sent off for denying them a clear goalscoring chance early on. I admit I might be too harsh on him, but watching him play is so underwhelming. Especially for England where his signature move is making himself available for a pass, receives a pass, does a backpass then points to where his teammates should pass next. His passing range seems so limited.
In comparison Carrick got a lot of stick for doing backpasses, but he had 10x the passing range of Rice. It would be an extremely underwhelming signing and borderline insanity at the prices quoted.
Matic is better on the ball than Rice will ever be.
He’s peddling the over 100m narrative hardJacob Steinberg is a huge Hammers fan, the only time you will see him write a piece and admit Rice is going, is when its more or less an open secret and obvious where he is going. Otherwise he will have none of it.
But then when there is far fetched rumours of West Ham wanting someone, he really gives it encouragement of happening.
Better at carrying the ball and passing the ball than Rice will ever be. Looks like prime Matic is being underrated.
Yep, and if someone bids it, his article will change to "X make 100m bid for rice, but hammers insist he is not for sale, even for 100m" His articles are too biasedHe’s peddling the over 100m narrative hard
The fact that he was there was encouraging, we never see any of mids being the last man back tracking runners. Fred doesn't do it, McT doesn't do it and Matic either, even in his prime. He lacked a little composure on the foul, and hopefully that would come with age, he was never going to be sent of though, as Walker would have made the tackle.I like his natural defensive positioning, I also like the way he was constantly organising those around him. We need someone to give Pogba and Bruno a bollicking from time to time. As many have said his price is the issue, he's no 80 mill player. Re Carrick I don't recall him being given stick for back passes, my issue with him was he tended to be a little passive. Like Matic, Carrick depended on being great positionally, but once his line was passed he wasn't one for getting back and making last ditch tackles. Rice can do that part but as you say his passing isn't as good as Carrick or Matic.He's at best 40 mill, but we ain't getting him at that price it seems.
So who should we looking at replacing Matic with then in your opinion
The answer isn't definitely yes, which is the biggest issue.Lots of people are missing the point, lets not compare him to Matic in his prime, the only question you have to ask yourself is simply is he better than Fred or Scott? If so he'll make our team better.
Yes they're probably better people out there but 1 step at a time.
Better at carrying the ball and passing the ball than Rice will ever be. Looks like prime Matic is being underrated.
Not gonna lie I have no idea at all. That being said anything above 40m is crazy. I have maintained that I think he is good enough defensively but I am yet to see anything to say he is good enough on the ball.
I can understand why you see it that way but I didn't feel encouraged at all after that situation, especially when it was followed up with the Germans running through the England midfield like knife through butter.
I'm open to being completely wrong about Rice, but I have yet to see anything that warrants the hype. Even when he made his first appearance in central defence he gained plaudits but I thought he looked extremely shaky. Granted, that was a few years ago so he obviously has improved, but still find him too limited for how I see a DM at United. His passing range (based on the matches I've seen) has been extremely limited. Even when there's an opportunity to play easy forward passes, he still choose to play it backwards. But I'm probably biased because it really annoys me when players play easy backwards passes and subsequently points to where his teammates should pass next when they could have easily done it themselves.
Usually the response is that he does the invisible but important job of ball recycling, but I still can't see that he does this so well that it will outweigh his passing limitations.
As for Carrick he got loads of stick for being a coward when it comes to passing. He even got trolled massively during a couple of Q&A's with questions like "Since you are unable to pass the ball forward, have you considered playing rugby?" and "what's the key to your fantastic linkup play with De Gea?". Which is ironic considering how good Carrick's passing range was and that he served up some of the best United assists in my lifetime.
It's debatable whether he is, to be honest. He's obviously better at protecting the backline in deeper areas, but that's really about it. Unless you think that's enough to then allow Pogba to play in a midfield two (I don't) I don't think it's enough.Lots of people are missing the point, lets not compare him to Matic in his prime, the only question you have to ask yourself is simply is he better than Fred or Scott? If so he'll make our team better.
I think you'd be surprised. They held out for 80m for Maguire, and Ndidi is more important to them than Maguire ever was.Bit mad that no one's been linked to someone like Ndidi.
I know Leicester would ask for big money but I doubt it'd be close to 100m pounds
Spot on.I respect your view but you just can't compare rice to makelele. May be both defensive midfielders. That's the only similarity between those two. He was totally different league compared to rice.
There is no comparison at all in playing style,ability on shielding the ball, snuff out danger, height,pace,single touch pass albeit always short passes. Nobody play well as makelele in that defensive midfield role not even kante in my humble opinion.
The guy is Makelele.
The guy makes the rest of the team play better, it gives the team a shape; a freedom to do as you please.
He stops the channels and the passing capabilities of the opposition before they even get the foot on the ball.
I just think that a player like him isn’t exactly easy to find - even if we need that new version of Carrick - I don’t see why we should bypass that new version of Makelele.
The Bruno Fernandes, Pogba, Fred and possibly VDB Hannibal and Garner doesn’t really highlight the need for more creativity as the thing we need the most in my opinion - we need that ability to have our creative players play with a freedom higher up the pitch with ease.
Ndidi is shit. You don't want him !!How much would Ndidi be? Big fan of him.
Bit mad that no one's been linked to someone like Ndidi.
I know Leicester would ask for big money but I doubt it'd be close to 100m pounds
His stats compare very very favorably to Rice and he's a true DM
If we were to get Phillips would make way more sense to sell Fred.OGS will stick to his double pivot.
Sell Pogba and Donny, get Locatelli and Kalvin Philipps.
Midfield problem solved for the next 5 years at least, and Carrick will love to coach these two
With a CB with pace I don’t think he willOGS will stick to his double pivot.
Sell Pogba and Donny, get Locatelli and Kalvin Philipps.
Midfield problem solved for the next 5 years at least, and Carrick will love to coach these two
Ndidi is shit. You don't want him !!
If Garner turns out to be next Nicky Butt it will be an achievement. So far he has shown nothing of that sort.Declan Rice is basically Matic in his prime. If James Garner grows as expected (I view him as a Kroos-type of player), we will have a prime Matic-Kroos midfield pair for the next decade.
Looking at the rumors, more likely Pogba will be sold than Fred.If we were to get Phillips would make way more sense to sell Fred.