M Bison
Full Member
Maybe he doesn't like lego plastic clubs like a certain Argentinian cry baby?
Maybe he doesn't like lego plastic clubs like a certain Argentinian cry baby?
Agüero?Maybe he doesn't like lego plastic clubs like a certain Argentinian cry baby?
That explanation of his release clause makes no sense and seems very improbable. So he just signed a new contract with a release clause, but the release clause has to apply this summer only? When the rest of the explanation says the release clause only applies in their list year, which in guessing is now a few years away.
Would be a very odd way of doing things.
Since he plays for an energy drink bankrolled team, I would find that hard to believe.Maybe he doesn't like lego plastic clubs like a certain Argentinian cry baby?
Still better than state/oil funded shitty in my book.Since he plays for an energy drink bankrolled team, I would find that hard to believe.
Yeah well, I refuse to believe it until I hear that we are monitoring the situation!!I refuse to believe this is happening until I hear we are preparing a bid.
He is no cry babe but close enoughAgüero?
Ogden is clueless. Dayot just signed a new contract means the new contract has no release clause can be activated until next year and it also means that the player decided to commit his future for another year with RB Leipzig for another year.
Yeah, you came out to be a bit of a chump here. Unless Hirst, Kajumba and Ogden are all clueless of course.Yes and you just got click baited by him.
I lmagine Laird would displace Williams in that list, but I think Ole fancies Williams to be a John O Shea player who can also cover midfield.If we could get our defense options down to:
GK: De Gea, Henderson, (Periera)
CB: Maguire, Lindelof, Upamecano and Taunzebe
RB: AWB, Williams
LB Shaw, Regulion
We’d be set for the next 5 years minimum.
We need the reliable German and French media outlets to weigh in.All we need now is a tweet from Simon Stone or the Athletic to confirm we are monitoring the Dayot situation and it's on!
I fecking love Bailly. It’s a shame how it’s worked out with him. Fitness aside, I think he’s good enough.I get serious Bailly vibes from him (including from a fitness point of view)
Why? Werners case followed this very example before he moved to Chelsea. If a club and player agrees to roll over the terms then theres nothing nonsensical about itSeems completely nonsensical. If you sign a new contract, the terms of the old contract don’t roll over. I think someone on the internet has probably been collecting info from multiple sources and get very confused - and then people have taken this flawed analysis as fact.
I fecking love Bailly. It’s a shame how it’s worked out with him. Fitness aside, I think he’s good enough.
I love Bailly, but this guy can actually head a ball by the looks of itI get serious Bailly vibes from him (including from a fitness point of view)
Still got Konaté to come back who personally I think is the better player. Then have Mukiele who played a few games at Cb and looked quite promising On top of Klosterman and the other guy who’s name escapes me.I would assume Leipzig is evaluating Upamecano's contributions in the coming season a lot higher than just 8M. They have been great in recent years but their position in the top4 is not as settled as you may think and losing out on the Champions League would not only be very costly but also damaging to their project to compete for the Bundesliga title within the next five years.
Anything under 60M probably isn't even of real interest to Leipzig.
Boom boom, let me hear you say Day-O; Day-O!So how do you pronounce his first name? Is it Day-O? If so there’s a great chant in there.
So how do you pronounce his first name? Is it Day-O? If so there’s a great chant in there.
That explanation of his release clause makes no sense and seems very improbable. So he just signed a new contract with a release clause, but the release clause has to apply this summer only? When the rest of the explanation says the release clause only applies in their last year, which in guessing is now a few years away.
So how much is his release clause in his last year of his new contract?
Would be a very odd way of doing things. Surely, if anything, his previous release clause for the higher amount is what would still stand this summer.
Ask FellainiThis deal doesn't make any sense. There was a release clause which was active until July. Then he signed a new contract with new release clause coming into effect the next summer?
Why would we go him for him now rather than two months before?
It is a littltle confusing regarding the old and new release clause. But from my understanding of the info it's the €60m release which is still active until end of the new season. So if a club comes to a agreement with the player the €60m release clause can be triggered which would be enough to get the player.Quick question as I’m a little confused here..
Referring to the last two lines of the image mentioning release clause information..
Technically if we agree personal terms with Upamecano, we can basically just go ahead and sign him for €42m ?
What I’ve seen from Upamecano, he doesn’t seem so dominant in the air. Not bad, but not good.I love Bailly, but this guy can actually head a ball by the looks of it
He isn't so dominant and I feel he is a bit short for a CB (the two most dominating CBs in the air, Maguire and VVD are both taller) but unlike Bailly he actually knows how to head a ball. Eric jumps in a duel and ducks his head which is laughable.What I’ve seen from Upamecano, he doesn’t seem so dominant in the air. Not bad, but not good.
Considering Leipzig's approach to the rumours on social media;
and more, i'd be very surprised if this happened this window, i would absolutely love to be proven wrong, as he is the CB i'd go for if we can get someone in, I just don't see it happening because of this contract issue, but I think the only chance we can even land him is this season if we can SOMEHOW convince Leipzig to sell. Next season because of the clause, every top team in the world will be after him.