I know I would.Would you be happy to get him back?
I don't know who the bigger mugs are.
PSG for selling at a massive loss after just a couple of seasons or Chelsea for buying back a notoriously unreliable defender after managing to feck him off for a record fee?
I'm fairly certain it was £50 million.Massive loss? They signed him for 40 Million pounds and selling him for 30-35 Million pounds. Not much of a loss.
Would you be happy to get him back?
Massive loss? They signed him for 40 Million pounds and selling him for 30-35 Million pounds. Not much of a loss.
He was the worst player on the pitch against Monaco two days ago and was awarded a 2/10 rating by l'equipe. What a disastrous signing
I've never seen anything to suggest he's the best defender I've ever seenOn his day he can be the best defender you've ever seen. Unfortunately he can also be the worst. He keeps life exciting, and he's also brilliant fun.
Technically, theyve got him back and made £20m.I don't know who the bigger mugs are.
PSG for selling at a massive loss after just a couple of seasons or Chelsea for buying back a notoriously unreliable defender after managing to feck him off for a record fee?
Is that preferrable to leaving him there and pocketing a smooth 50?Technically, theyve got him back and made £20m.
Well, theyve not lost out, have theyIs that preferrable to leaving him there and pocketing a smooth 50?
Is that preferrable to leaving him there and pocketing a smooth 50?
No thanks.The Prem needs sideshow Bob back.
I'm fairly certain it was £50 million.
Apparently it was the English media who inflated the fee and reported £50m. In reality, I remember reading more reliable sources say it was around £40m.They signed him for £50m.
Apparently it was the English media who inflated the fee and reported £50m. In reality, I remember reading more reliable sources say it was around £40m.
Anyways, I wonder who he replaces in the first XI? No way we spend £30m on a 29 year old to sit on the bench. Will JT be an undisputed starter all season again, I wonder. Cahill and Luiz would be a "close your eyes and pray" partnership.
I've never seen anything to suggest he's the best defender I've ever seen
I'm fairly certain it was £50 million.
They signed him for £50m.
We don't need the money, Conte thinks that we do need the player.
Apparently it was the English media who inflated the fee and reported £50m. In reality, I remember reading more reliable sources say it was around £40m.
Anyways, I wonder who he replaces in the first XI? No way we spend £30m on a 29 year old to sit on the bench. Will JT be an undisputed starter all season again, I wonder. Cahill and Luiz would be a "close your eyes and pray" partnership.
You haven't watched that much David Luiz then. When he concentrates (which is far less often than a normal human would) he is composed, has amazing passing range, outstanding tackling and is just generally class personified. Oh and then occasionally he'll run up field and belt in a goal from 40 yards just for kicks. The reason PSG paid so much for him is that Good David Luiz is someone every team in the world would want. If they could just find a way to get rid of Bad David Luiz.
This is ridiculous, Chelsea should be alarmed that PSG are willing to sell him back for nearly half the price they spent on him.
Yes, and good Nani was up there with Ronaldo. And good Balotelli was as good as any striker. But there's no point buying a Porsche if it breaks down 4/10 times.
7-1He really doesn't feck up as much as people think he does, but when he does its usually really dramatic and memorable.
You don't need this player. You need a defender. An actual defender.
Given the list of defenders Chelsea have been linked with, Luiz would appear to be the man at the bottom of the shortlist. If he was even on it to begin with.
Anyways, I wonder who he replaces in the first XI? No way we spend £30m on a 29 year old to sit on the bench. Will JT be an undisputed starter all season again, I wonder. Cahill and Luiz would be a "close your eyes and pray" partnership.
Still don't think we'd have the personnel to play with 3 at the back. Who would the 3 be? What would happen to Azpi?Would give Conte the option to play 3 at the back.
Losing £15m after 2 years isn't really a massive loss. His value was going to go down due to age and 2 years less on contractI don't know who the bigger mugs are.
PSG for selling at a massive loss after just a couple of seasons or Chelsea for buying back a notoriously unreliable defender after managing to feck him off for a record fee?
He really isn't.That's your opinion. It seems Conte might not agree.
The idea that he's not a good defender is hilarious, we won the fecking Champions League with this guy in our defense!
Luiz / Zouma / Terry would be a pretty decent 3. Azpi can play wing back, but his output will be a bit low maybe.Still don't think we'd have the personnel to play with 3 at the back. Who would the 3 be? What would happen to Azpi?
Still don't think we'd have the personnel to play with 3 at the back. Who would the 3 be? What would happen to Azpi?
Luiz / Zouma / Terry would be a pretty decent 3. Azpi can play wing back, but his output will be a bit low maybe.
That's your opinion. It seems Conte might not agree.
The idea that he's not a good defender is hilarious, we won the fecking Champions League with this guy in our defense!