Cassidy
No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Messages
- 32,941
50m
I've not read the tweets because I'm bored fecking shitless with them, if they want him he should be the most expensive transfer in the world, no less than £150m , if mbappe is valued above 130 then David should be way above him regardless of where they play, if you want the best in each position you're going to have to pay, especially as he's the best in the damn world.
In today's market I genuinely don't think Madrid can afford him. With the prices some players are going for, De Gea is now well, well over 100M and I can't see them spending that if they also want Mbappe within the next couple of transfer windows....
I really don't think the club was the source of anything the press wrote relating to our pursuit of Morata, other than that we'd dropped the interest and were going for Lukaku instead.Are people all so convinced Madrid messed us around over Morata? I kept reading that, while they did set the valuation above what we said we were willing to pay (and below what we paid for Lukaku), they were open to getting the deal done, and that it was us who seemed to be playing games, not putting in an official bid, putting a lot of stuff out through the media but not actually approaching the club. And then, out of the blue, signing Lukaku.
So all this "after what they did to us with Morata" stuff seems a little misplaced. But then maybe Ive been reading the wrong reports.
That wasn't de Gea not being ready, that was just van Gaal fearing he wasn't . I have no doubt that de Gea would have been up to his usual standard, had he played those games.But if they cause some serious unrest to De Gea himself, then it puts us in a tough position. He's already missed some games due to not being mentally ready to play at the start of 15/16. Madrid can easily make that happen again.
Agree. I'm really not a fan of Bale and would not be a happy bunny if that happened.I don't know why people would be happy to see Bale coming the other way. A 28 year old crock on half a million a week. Real Madrid will be delighted to include him in the deal.
The way I would see this is that every selling club has a right to set a price for their player. We might not agree with the price they set on Morata, hence we didnt pay it and shopped elsewhere. No harm done. Similarly, if they make us an offer for De Gea that doesnt meet our valuation then we dont sell to them, same thing. In which case neither club is messing the other one around. But of course there could be plenty more to this that we dont know about, which could constitute some level of shenanigans.I really don't think the club was the source of anything the press wrote relating to our pursuit of Morata, other than that we'd dropped the interest and were going for Lukaku instead.
And it's not so much that Madrid fecked us over, more that they asked a ridiculous amount for a player that wanted to leave, and that hey seemed completely unwilling to compromise. If they, in light of that, rock up with a £50m bid for de Gea, it should be considered an insult, and Ed should ring Perez and tell him to do one.
That wasn't de Gea not being ready, that was just van Gaal fearing he wasn't . I have no doubt that de Gea would have been up to his usual standard, had he played those games.
Well according to Balage we were but thinking about it this is just Woodward doing his thing.This is quite interesting.
I'm only hearing English papers reporting that we are braced for a bid for Real, I've heard/seen nothing in the Spanish press.
Is Woodward briefing the English media? Are we really trying to sell De Gea?
It didn't seem like they were messing us about, no, they were just being very stubborn with regards to their asking price, as is their right. It was a player they neither wanted nor needed to sell, and it didn't seem like Morata, despite wishing to move, wanted to force it.The way I would see this is that every selling club has a right to set a price for their player. We might not agree with the price they set on Morata, hence we didnt pay it and shopped elsewhere. No harm done. Similarly, if they make us an offer for De Gea that doesnt meet our valuation then we dont sell to them, same thing. In which case neither club is messing the other one around. But of course there could be plenty more to this that we dont know about, which could constitute some level of shenanigans.
I just find it strange that the narrative still seems to be they messed us about, like I said I must have read different reports because what I read seemed to speculate we were the ones playing games (which I was delighted about, as it happens.) In fact on the day the Lukaku news broke the line seemed to be, "ha ha, nice one Woody, you beat them at their own game, the Morata thing was a smokescreen the whole time." Somehow that has morphed into "they messed us about so we went for Lukaku instead."
If the bid materializes, I hope de Gea takes note that the club that valued a squad player who wanted out, and that they were open to selling, at €90m, while apparently only valuing him, a player who's club is not interested in selling, at €50m.I'd assume he would be too. But it's becoming rather common. It's happening right now with Sigurdsson. We've seen it before with Modric, Berbatov and a few others. If Madrid make serious moves for De Gea and unsettle him, then it puts pressure on the club.
He's in a tough situation though. I don't think he would refuse a move to Madrid, but he seems to have a connection with United that he wouldn't force his way out. It's probably why this seems to rumble on forever.
Some on here think that it was a ploy to say that we got one over Madrid again when De Gea stays. But imo De Gea also wants to join Madrid but won't push for a move, which is a similar but opposite situation to Morata's. So we need to take the same stance as Madrid took with Morata, in that we ask for a really high fee (£100m+) and if Madrid really want him, then they pay. Otherwise, we keep him.Why did we brief this?
Mate, I know its probably just a figure of speech but in case its not, my advice to you FWIW is dont let yourself be annoyed by this because a) it probably wont happen anyway, I mean after all, how many things have the newspapers been right about this summer? Even when they all say the same thing. And b) even if they do make a bid that is nowhere near acceptable there is no reason to believe DDG is going to let it affect him, he doesnt appear to be pushing to leave and seems to know the score. I reckon Woodward and Mourinho will have explained the situation to him, which was apparently that if they wanted to sign him they had to pay up, and if they did that we would let him go. He will know what his value realistically is and he will also have read reports Madrid were no longer interested. So I dont think he will feel the club has done the wrong thing by him if, a month from now, we reject an offer because we havent lined up a replacement for him and the amount offered wouldnt cover the cost of it even if we had.It didn't seem like they were messing us about, no, they were just being very stubborn with regards to their asking price, as is their right. It was a player they neither wanted nor needed to sell, and it didn't seem like Morata, despite wishing to move, wanted to force it.
The reason a potential £50m bid for de Gea annoys me, is that after that whole saga, even they know how incredibly insulting it would be for them to make a derisive bid like that for one of, if not the best, goalkeeper in the world. Not only did they make signing a squad player off of them needlessly hard, they're now apparently trying to lowball us, most likely hoping to unsettle de Gea. Which is why I think Woody should tell Perez to do one.
They wanted us to meet their valuation of a player they were open to selling, so they should at least come in with an offer that's likely to make us consider selling a player they know we're not at all open to selling. Instead, they're rumored to do the bidding equivalent of leaving a flaming bag of shit on our doorstep.
Give him a new contract and still get some players in.Let DDG go. Great keeper but we have Romero too, who has not let us down. Grab the money and let's get some players in.
Why?Let DDG go. Great keeper but we have Romero too, who has not let us down. Grab the money and let's get some players in.
I would say that his career thus far would suggest that, given enough time and chances, he will let us down.Let DDG go. Great keeper but we have Romero too, who has not let us down. Grab the money and let's get some players in.
Some on here think that it was a ploy to say that we got one over Madrid again when De Gea stays. But imo De Gea also wants to join Madrid but won't push for a move, which is a similar but opposite situation to Morata's. So we need to take the same stance as Madrid took with Morata, in that we ask for a really high fee (£100m+) and if Madrid really want him, then they pay. Otherwise, we keep him.
Don't forget the last 3 CL trophies, too!Let's be a bit more realistic; Marcelo, Casemiro, Bale, Isco + £75m should be an okay deal.
This is all Mendes...
We're not even after another goalkeeper.
I'm convinced Mendes is peeced off with United for not selling him to Madrid hence why we haven't done any deals with his players since then.