Lance Uppercut
Guest
hoho another one raises his head. Take it on the chin Lance.
What are you babbling about?
hoho another one raises his head. Take it on the chin Lance.
DDG was always a long term signing. Fergie would have expected some pain along the way.
I've always thought right from the start of the season that if we win the league with a goalkeeper in transition it would be a miracle.
You wouldn't rule it out with SAF though.
What are you babbling about?
DDG was always a long term signing. Fergie would have expected some pain along the way.
I've always thought right from the start of the season that if we win the league with a goalkeeper in transition it would be a miracle.
You wouldn't rule it out with SAF though.
You know, like a boxer ... an uppercut, perhaps.
Shouldn't have to sacrifice the league for a rookie keeper though. He's not prepared to risk the young Pogba/Morrison, but is for De Gea.
Does anyone know what this tool is talking about?
Shouldn't have to sacrifice the league for a rookie keeper though. He's not prepared to risk the young Pogba/Morrison, but is for De Gea. Oh well no harm done...
Are you seriously comparing De Gea to "barely kicked a ball for the first team" Pogba and Morrison?
It's absolutely laughable for people to try and cover up De Gea's fundamental GK weaknesses by putting it down to him being rotated for the odd league and cup game.
It's absolutely laughable for people to try and cover up De Gea's fundamental GK weaknesses by putting it down to him being rotated for the odd league and cup game.
De Gea is young but he's not in the same bracket as Morrison or Pogba.
He has over 100 senior appearances in one of the top leagues in the world.
Okay class ... if you haven't been following along, and I know you have young shoots as you know I've taken a bit of stick for being somewhat smug wrt to a few on here (and pretty much all usual suspects ... you know who you are) ... have all 'raised their heads to have another go' again. Usual playground gang mentality.
LanceUppercut ... take it (back) on the chin ???? No ? No ?
D- ... must try harder.
Again, what the hell is this fruitcake babbling about?
Okay ... you coming across as being somewhat dim. Comprendez ? I tried other means which are far more interesting for me but in hindsight I should have just used the shovel and called it as it was ... plainly simple.
I apologise for being curt. Clearly English is not your first language.
Just as a few (based on this site) don't think DDG is the right choice just now. Did I actually say Berbatov was a fail failure ? NOPE. As I said ... go back ad re-read ... you're blinded by your own opinion. I said that I thought Berbatov was a mistake for the way United played the game. Go back and check it out, you'll see I'm right.
Here's what you said I wrote: 'saying you've got some pleasure out of us losing to fecking liverpool because you've been proven right',
What I actually wrote:'You just hate it because I, and a few have been right all along ... I take a bit of pleasure in that, if only because it partly justifies my eye for the game but not because I want DDG to fail ... from day one he didn't look ready, and I'm still not convinced he does actually have all the qualities to be a top class keeper.'
Your subsequent reply above is some serious 'turning shit around'. You can't be taken seriously.
Funnier by the moment if it wasn't so pathetic.
The thing is if you were glasses it makes your sight as good as if you don't need glasses. But in football, among plenty activities, you can't wear glasses. That's wear contacts come in (and I'm not talking about your phone book on your mobile). They work the same way as glasses but you wear them on your eyes and you wouldn't notice a person wearing them at all.
The thing is if you were glasses it makes your sight as good as if you don't need glasses. But in football, among plenty activities, you can't wear glasses. That's wear contacts come in (and I'm not talking about your phone book on your mobile). They work the same way as glasses but you wear them on your eyes and you wouldn't notice a person wearing them at all.
It's not that simple, I wear both and despite being of relative strength would say I can see better with glasses, however being a vein (if not ugly) bastard I don't wear glasses often. That said I am Myopic, rather than Hyperopic.
complete twat however is undeniable!
I do wonder how much this affects him?
Manchester United's error-prone David de Gea may need eye surgery | Football | The Guardian
Shouldn't have to sacrifice the league for a rookie keeper though. He's not prepared to risk the young Pogba/Morrison, but is for De Gea. Oh well no harm done...
It's not that simple, I wear both and despite being of relative strength would say I can see better with glasses, however being a vein (if not ugly) bastard I don't wear glasses often. That said I am Myopic, rather than Hyperopic.
When Schemeichel was De Gea's age he was in the World Wildlife fund, and was playing amateur football, when Van Der Sar was De Gea's age he just started at Ajax, let's not forget VDS was terrible at Juventus, years later. Goalkeepers don't just suddenly become world beaters. Hart was on loan at fecking blackpool at age 21.
The thing is if you were glasses it makes your sight as good as if you don't need glasses. But in football, among plenty activities, you can't wear glasses. That's wear contacts come in (and I'm not talking about your phone book on your mobile). They work the same way as glasses but you wear them on your eyes and you wouldn't notice a person wearing them at all.
Thanks for that.
I dont think he looks out of his depth at all, doesn't he have more saves made than any other keeper in the league?
I think he suffers a bit from nerves, particularly when he doesn't have Rio or Vidic in front of him to take control in the area.
All quite understandable for a 21 year old, but I still think he'll be a top keeper.
Right... so that is not saying in-turn that he's a failure as a signing?? He was a mistake, but a good buy. Right... glad you've cleared that up.
Again, what the hell... you've directly avoided the accusation by talking nonsensical bollocks. I'll say it again, you take a bit of pleasure in getting it "right" that DDG would be a "failure" is, in-turn, taking pleasure out of losing todays game of football. You can't have one without the other. That point still stands, no matter how you want to avoid it.
Hilarious indeed... the original point still stands though. You didn't original read my post as you asked why I hadn't formed my own opinion on Gordon, when I clearly said that I had. Again, good way of avoiding the issue though, kudos to you.
The rest of your post was, by a clear distance, the most sensible/well-reasoned thing you've said all day... as it lacked any form of wummery.
Shouldn't have to sacrifice the league for a rookie keeper though. He's not prepared to risk the young Pogba/Morrison, but is for De Gea. Oh well no harm done...
I've got no idea WTF you're on about now ... in fact I don't think you do either. I'm not going to even try to unravel your ball of cofusion, so that's it for me ... can't be arsed with this anymore. Lets just leave it at that. Good night ... gonna have a few and watch the All Stars skills competition.
De Gea is young but he's not in the same bracket as Morrison or Pogba.
He has over 100 senior appearances in one of the top leagues in the world.