If Lukaku is £28m, Welbeck is at least £20-25m with the added English player tax. Simple as that.
£10m is an insult.
To be fair he would walk into Arsenal's team. As he would at Spurs, though you aren't a champions league club. Still though, if we did want to get rid, which we don't, he'd be able to go to much better teams.
In for Giroud? I don't think Giroud is awful but I don't think he suits the rest of your team and tends to go missing when it matters. Welbeck's pace, power, skill on the ball and link up play would benefit you a lot more then what Giroud does and given the consistent first team football and the chances he'd get, I think his finishing would vastly improve too. It'd be like the Sturridge situation, finding the team for him where he'll get games and him suiting the team.For who exactly? OR do you mean squad?
In for Giroud? I don't think Giroud is awful but I don't think he suits the rest of your team and tends to go missing when it matters. Welbeck's pace, power, skill on the ball and link up play would benefit you a lot more then what Giroud does and given the consistent first team football and the chances he'd get, I think his finishing would vastly improve too. It'd be like the Sturridge situation, finding the team for him where he'll get games and him suiting the team.
Giroud just always looks out of place when he plays and he's very inconsistent.
Though saying walk in is a bit much I'll admit. I think he'd definitely get into your starting 11 ahead of Giroud though.
In for Giroud? I don't think Giroud is awful but I don't think he suits the rest of your team and tends to go missing when it matters. Welbeck's pace, power, skill on the ball and link up play would benefit you a lot more then what Giroud does and given the consistent first team football and the chances he'd get, I think his finishing would vastly improve too. It'd be like the Sturridge situation, finding the team for him where he'll get games and him suiting the team.
Giroud just always looks out of place when he plays and he's very inconsistent.
Though saying walk in is a bit much I'll admit. I think he'd definitely get into your starting 11 ahead of Giroud though.
It's good but I wouldn't say it's much better then Welbecks, Welbecks movement afterwards definitely more then makes up the difference anyway. Arsenal have plenty of players for the link up play anyways, they need pace and power and Welbeck once he gets the confidence that comes with being a first team player I think would be great for them.You're shitting me. Absolutely no chance, have you watched Giroud play for Arsenal? His link up play is one of his strongest attributes
It's good but I wouldn't say it's much better then Welbecks, Welbecks movement afterwards definitely more then makes up the difference anyway. Arsenal have plenty of players for the link up play anyways, they need pace and power and Welbeck once he gets the confidence that comes with being a first team player I think would be great for them.
Giroud every now and then goes through good runs of form where he gets goals, but he just always looks out of place playing for them when they would be much better off with a hard working, fast and powerful striker, which Welbeck has the potential to be.
In fairness Welbeck scored 9 goals in 15 starts last season. Better ratio than Lukaku's 15 goals in 29 starts.
I am quite surprised Everton didn't try and lowball for Welbeck before blowing all their money on Lukaku. Could have got a better player for half the price.
Nowhere. The thread has just managed to pick up momentum because the Caf's resident spackers have decided it'd be a good place to bash Welbeck.Where the hell has this come from
If Lukaku is £28m, Welbeck is at least £20-25m with the added English player tax. Simple as that.
£10m is an insult.
This thread keeps getting better. Welbeck? Starting for Arsenal? Ahead of Giroud? And we laugh at RAWK for saying Henderson is bettter than Ramsey. Welbeck is a Manc Ameobi.
Lukaku scored a goal for every 170 minutes. Welbeck scored one for every 160 minutes.
I think he'll play his way into the first team this season if we stick with the 352.
Welbeck is worth no where near that amount.Would be madness I rate him that highly it would have to be £30m+
Boil your head in a bucket of brain juice. If the likes of Shane long are going for 12m and championship players for 10m, then the market dictates that Welbeck would fetch more
This thread keeps getting better. Welbeck? Starting for Arsenal? Ahead of Giroud? And we laugh at RAWK for saying Henderson is bettter than Ramsey. Welbeck is a Manc Ameobi.
Interesting. Would love to know how they compare if you remove all the minutes Welbeck played on the wing.
Apparently one of these two strikers is a "Manc Ameobi" who is massively over-rated, can't score for shit and should be sold if we can anywhere near 15m quid for him.
The other, less prolific striker, just changed clubs for almost twice that. Go figure.
You get lots of spacker opinions on here about United players. Always have done. It's just a shame that the players who should be cut the most slack often seem to be the least appreciated. You're more likely to see people looking for excuses for expensive foreign imports than you are local lads, who've been at the club all their footballing life. How did that happen?
At the expense of who, Rooney or RVP?
I don't see how he won't get plenty of game-time through, especially if Hernandez is sold.
At the expense of who, Rooney or RVP?
I don't see how he won't get plenty of game-time through, especially if Hernandez is sold.
Lukaku has scored twice as many Premier league goals as Welbeck.
I presume that's why he is valued as twice as much.
In fact, Lukaku has scored more premier league goals than Welbeck in the past two seasons than Welbeck has scored league goals total.
That whole goals per minute thing go right over your head?
Silly really. The obvious retort was to mention their relative ages.
To be fair Lukaku can put the ball in the net, Welbeck struggles with that part of his game, which is odd for a striker.If Lukaku is £28m, Welbeck is at least £20-25m with the added English player tax. Simple as that.
£10m is an insult.
Interesting. Would love to know how they compare if you remove all the minutes Welbeck played on the wing.
Apparently one of these two strikers is a "Manc Ameobi" who is massively over-rated, can't score for shit and should be sold if we can anywhere near 15m quid for him.
The other, less prolific striker, just changed clubs for almost twice that. Go figure.
You get lots of spacker opinions on here about United players. Always have done. It's just a shame that the players who should be cut the most slack often seem to be the least appreciated. You're more likely to see people looking for excuses for expensive foreign imports than you are local lads, who've been at the club all their footballing life. How did that happen?
More paper talk and people jumping all over it.
Surely we can discuss it if Hull actually make a bid? And if I decent offer comes in, say £15m then I think it's a good deal for all parties.
Invest in other areas where we need to strengthen more?Why would you rather have an extra £15m on the club balance sheet than Danny Welbeck in the squad?
Does everybody forget his loan spell to Sunderland? He was awesome that year.Lukaku is younger and has proven he can score consistently in the PL playing for inferior teams to United.
Unfortunately Welbeck has not established or proven himself as yet - though he does have a superior all-round game than Lukaku. Regardless he wouldn't go for anywhere near 20+ million.
Invest in other areas where we need to strengthen more?
How much is he worth in your opinion? And if we have no shortage of money why are we not spending any?We have no shortage of money. There is absolutely no upside to selling Welbeck, especially not for £15m.