Some of the reactions in this thread have been fecking retarded.
Its just so true. I honestly think the standard of this forum has gone to shit, its like the newbies.
Some of the reactions in this thread have been fecking retarded.
Did they regularly not score though?
Look at Ruud's record at Welbeck's age.
I think some are going a bit overboard with the criticism, but this is the caf excuse for just about everything.
I've made the point a few times that we make far, far too many excuses on her for our players not performing, wheras when it comes to judging an opposition player, such variables are not considered when criticising.
If you read the caf, you will soon learn that a United player can only be criticised for his performances if he is older than 20, has been in the first-team for at least two seasons, with at least 10 consecutive games behind him in a particular run, playing in the exact area of the pitch of his choosing, with the exact teamates to get the best out of him, and have been injury free for at least 6 months.
If any of those variables are off, then it's never the players fault, or he is never just 'not good enough' and everyone else is retarded for having a go. However, it takes far less to write off a new Liverpool or Spurs signing, for instance. I know we are here to support United, but I think many deceive themselves.
It wasn't a gimmie but definitely a chance a United forward should be getting on target.
I still believe unless he gets a loan move for a season, where he can play consistently up top and improve his finishing and confidence about his finishing, he is never going to be close to the player he could be.
At the moment his career is heading the same way as a more attacking version of O'Shea. A decent player who can cover 3-4 different positions and will do an adequate job in each, occasionally having a game where everything clicks and supporters wonder if he's finally realised his potential, only for the next game to be back to normal.
Wait, are you saying football fans are biased and show favoritism towards players who play for their own team? Well, stop the press!
Coming back from an injury is a completely valid excuse for a player who might be off form, anyone who thinks differently has quite obviously never played any sort of sport in their life. As indeed is being young.
Agreed. However I just don't think he's ever going to improve his goalscoring. I don't think instinct around the box is something that can be learnt. Technique can be improved, but the mentality and natural instinct can't be taught.
Actually look at RVP's for that matter, people in this thread are genuinely thick, its like they are unable to look at football with any context whatsoever.
Actually look at RVP's for that matter, people in this thread are genuinely thick, its like they are unable to look at football with any context whatsoever.
It's not that, it's that he's a Manchester United striker who has scored 5 goals in his last 50 odd games.
Good power and nearly on target is far better than some of the shots we get from him where it just trickles to the keeper or goes well wideHow can you strike it well but hit it over the bar? Sounds like a shit finish to me.
The team is embarrassing, frankly.
And I'm sick of Hernandez being the fall guy - brought off for a 40 year old?
That's not the worst outcome for Danny though, to be fair. Such players, ideally, are the type we should be trying to get from our academy, as opposed to spending money on average players. We may as well keep our own to fill the one or two 'average player' spots we will need.
I must have missed something here?
What were these easy chanvces he missed today? He nearly got on the end of a Giggs ball he had no right to reach, then had a tricky half volleyed chance he basically created for himself go over the bar.
He was our brightest player when he came on. Rooney was the one guilty of fluffing an open goal.
Planet Redcafe is orbiting very far from the Earth this season.
Copied from Wikipedia, Van Nistelrooy's goalscoring record up to the age of 22:
1994–95 15 3 2 3 – – 17 61995–96 21 2 – – 21 21996–97 31 12 – – 31 12Total691723–– 71 20Heerenveen 1997–98 31 13 5 3 – – 36 16Total311353–– 3616
If Welbeck had the same natural talent as O'Shea then I'd agree. He would be a good squad/backup player, nothing more. However if anyone ever wants to see him realise his potential and be anything other than a backup player then he needs game time in his preferred position.
Barcelona send their talented player's out on loan (or sell with buyback clauses), even when they can make some contribution to the first team, for the greater good. Welbeck is always going to be a pretty irrelevant fish in a big pond, unless he has a season or 2 of consistent first team Football elsewhere. He certainly isn't going to improve his finishing and levels of confidence from the bench.
Copied from Wikipedia, Van Nistelrooy's goalscoring record up to the age of 22:
1994–95 15 3 2 3 – – 17 61995–96 21 2 – – 21 21996–97 31 12 – – 31 12Total691723–– 7120Heerenveen 1997–98 31 13 5 3 – – 36 16Total311353–– 3616
Wasn't RVN a defender or midfielder or something in his early career?
It's up to Welbeck to prove he is better than that I suppose. He, in my view, has gotten hsi fair share of preferential treatment with us. Under Fergie, he seemed to find a way into the starting XI almost every week. He returned from loan to immediately remove a previously very impressive Hernandez from the starting line-up, and has been given a very fair crack so far.
One thing he and Cleverley cannot say, in my view, is that they have not been given a decent crack at establishing themselves here.
I think some are going a bit overboard with the criticism, but this is the caf excuse for just about everything.
I've made the point a few times that we make far, far too many excuses on her for our players not performing, wheras when it comes to judging an opposition player, such variables are not considered when criticising.
If you read the caf, you will soon learn that a United player can only be criticised for his performances if he is older than 20, has been in the first-team for at least two seasons, with at least 10 consecutive games behind him in a particular run, playing in the exact area of the pitch of his choosing, with the exact teamates to get the best out of him, and have been injury free for at least 6 months.
If any of those variables are off, then it's never the players fault, or he is never just 'not good enough' and everyone else is retarded for having a go. However, it takes far less to write off a new Liverpool or Spurs signing, for instance. I know we are here to support United, but I think many deceive themselves.
He LITERALLY has though.
I don't think it's about appearances, it's about appearances in a preferred position. Cleverley as a more attacking midfielder with much more freedom for Watford and Wigan looked a far superior player. Likewise Welbeck made his name playing up front for Sunderland.
It depends what our plans for these homegrown player's are though. If the manager has them down as mediocre backup/squad player's then fair enough, they will fulfill this role well. Just as O'Shea, Brown etc have fulfilled it in the past.
I don't think it is a default situation that 'homegrown = squad player'. It is down to the individual. We have had players come through of course and be first-team regulars (1992). It may just be that Cleverley and Welbeck are not of that level.
And I don't recall Cleverley playing off the front for Wigan to be honest, and also, when he plays in central midfield for us, I see a complete coward in terms of attacking initiative, so I struggle to see that he is a natural attacking midfielder.
I don't think it is a default situation that 'homegrown = squad player'. It is down to the individual. We have had players come through of course and be first-team regulars (1992). It may just be that Cleverley and Welbeck are not of that level.
And I don't recall Cleverley playing off the front for Wigan to be honest, and also, when he plays in central midfield for us, I see a complete coward in terms of attacking initiative, so I struggle to see that he is a natural attacking midfielder.
I think there is a reason why we haven't seen a home grown attacking player cement a place in our first team in 20 years and a centre forward in 30 years. The competition in these area's is much higher; you need someone who is a ready made first team starter. Exceptional talents obviously make it regardless and hopefully the likes of Januzaj will fall into that category, but player's like Welbeck and Cleverley seem to show lots of initial promise, but a lack of (or sporadic) first team opportunities in their preferred position lead to stagnation and eventually just filling a lesser role.
Maybe Cleverley and Welbeck were never going to be great and only ever had the talent to fill this role. But when they were both playing consistent Football they both looked destined for better.
There's no lack of opportunities. They've been schooled in one of the best football academies their whole life. They would play more if they were better. If Welbeck actually was a good striker then he would play as a striker. He was used a lot ahead of Hernandez for a while and came up short. He's just way too bad of a finisher. Compare that single attribute to Ruud. There's a standard comparison of an average one (at best) and a world class one.
Welbeck's problem is that he doesn't really fit any position. Not for a top team at least. He reminds me of all those strikers through the years that have managed to be professional football players in a top league without scoring goals. Players like Roque Santa Cruz, Emile Heskey, Peter Crouch, Carlton Cole etc. All these years in the PL, all played with their national team. None of them had a goal scoring record fit to rival Defoe or Bent. Most of them only managed one good season. Don't get me wrong, I don't think he's a target man. I just think he's as effective as those I mentioned at the moment and I'm not sure how much more effective he'll be in the future without massively improving his finishing and shooting.
I think there is a reason why we haven't seen a home grown attacking player cement a place in our first team in 20 years and a centre forward in 30 years. The competition in these area's is much higher; you need someone who is a ready made first team starter. Exceptional talents obviously make it regardless and hopefully the likes of Januzaj will fall into that category, but player's like Welbeck and Cleverley seem to show lots of initial promise, but a lack of (or sporadic) first team opportunities in their preferred position lead to stagnation and eventually just filling a lesser role.
Maybe Cleverley and Welbeck were never going to be great and only ever had the talent to fill this role. But when they were both playing consistent Football they both looked destined for better.
Yea that's fair.
Also, as you referenced Januzaj, he is a good example. It's simply about being good enough. As I said in another thread, we perhaps make too many excuses for our players. In a few years when Adnan is one of the best 10s around, it will be no excuse that he is playing out wide now. Obviously Messi is an extreme, but similarly, he played wide right early on, and looked good not because his best position is right wing, but because he is very good. Welbeck should do better in attacking situations, whether he is wide or not.
When he gets to the edge of the box, he will play the wrong pass, not play the pass at all, or scuff his shot. His position is not a factor here. The idea is that he gets goals from a wide area before being moved in field. Not that he needs to move in field to get goals. Top attackers are often brought into the team in wide areas before they are ready to move in field. Danny isn't doing enough from the left to earn a move into the middle. Players like Henry or Sturridge got goals from wide and then got their chance centrally. Welbeck is being played wide to be able to show he can get goals without the burden of carrying the weight of the teams scoring expectations. If he was getting 15 from wide, he'll show he can handle being a 9 for us.
Its actually mad. ive now learned that sidefooted half volley hit at full pace is now "an easy chance". This site is on a downward spiral thats for sure.
Lukaku will be a better goal scorer but I'd be amazed if he's a better player than Danny Welbeck. He's awful with the ball.
Lukaku is quite young, and is still learning. I think a striker who actually gets goals and is lethal in front of goal is what you want in the first place. Lukaku is doing well but he has a way to go yet. Danny while having all the natural talent is not a natural goal scorer, you don't need to be one to be prolific. You can learn how to be a great/good finisher. Danny just doesn't seem confident infront of goal, it is worrying. I mean he hasn't played upfront but he has played a lot of football, wingers do score goals. He is still too clumsy and thinks to much in the box.
I'm assuming he needs to play upfront more if he is ever going to realise his potential. Sadly I don't think that can happen here.
Look at Ruud's record at Welbeck's age.
The season Ruud was 22 he scored 31 goals in 34 matches (second highest in Europe) and a hat trick in the CL. He was voted as the Dutch player of the year. At 23 he added 29 more goals.
Welbeck is 23 tomorrow.
The season Ruud was 22 he scored 31 goals in 34 matches (second highest in Europe) and a hat trick in the CL. He was voted as the Dutch player of the year. At 23 he added 29 more goals.
Welbeck is 23 tomorrow.