I've thought for some time that his best traits lie outwith being a centre forward, and considering how poor his crossing, finishing and composure in the penalty area are, I don't think that can be argued. But when it is suggested that his traits would possibly suit a deeper role, you just get the green laughing smiley as a response, as if you've just suggested we play David Moyes in goal.
Considering how good Welbeck is off the ball - defending, pressing, work rate, physicality, and his short passing when he drops deep is very good as he seems to thrive playing football in tight spaces - I don't know why it is laughable to suggest that he could thrive in a deeper position, yet it is much less laughable to suggest that we simply persist with him as a forward, despite his finishing being just awful. If anything, it is vice versa.
I don't think that moving a player into a position which is more fitting of his traits and utilising him for what he is actually good at is so outrageous. He's a striker who doesn't score many goals. He's simply not a goal threat. You wouldn't play a goalkeeper who can't catch, so why play a striker who can't finish? But despite that, he's a very good footballer and is very good at alot of things. Just not putting the ball in the net.