Carl
has permanently erect nipples
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2008
- Messages
- 45,759
Yep, sure thing.
Welbeck was probably England's most important player defensively and in the second half won the ball back and kept it in Poland's half better than anyother player, but you probably didn't notice that because he had a shot that went wide, or something.
Gerrard could score a hatrick, save a penalty by outrunning the shot, and retain 99% of possession by repeatedly passing the ball to himself and people on here would still say he was a bit shite. That was the first time in years England actually had a decent looking midfield...it turns out Gerrard might actually be quite good when he's not having to do Lampard's jon as well as his own.
Townsend played like a clown. He showed promise of being a good player when he was actually on the wing, but against any decent side he'd have been enough on his own to cost England any chance of winning (or more likely he'd have been removed from the game a lot sooner). If Poland were less wasteful it could easily have happened last night...for which no doubt Cahill or Smalling would have illogically been blamed.
You seem to have made 2 incorrect assumptions here. Firstly, that I have somewhere said Welbeck was shit. I haven't. I just disagreed that he was the best player on the pitch, because he wasn't. Secondly, that I have somewhere said that Gerrard was shit. Again, I haven't. In fact I said in another thread that I thought he played well.