I was speaking to my City supporting mate at work today. Despite being a blue, he's not a dick, and he has plenty of pre-Eastlands memories as well. He's a good lad.
Surprisingly, He's a big fan of Welbeck. Most opposing fans write him off as being headless or whatever, but he has alot of positives to take from him, arguably more than I do most of the time.
I think the obvious thing that can be drawn from Welbeck is he doesn't score many, nor does he pose a real threat infront of goal. Despite that, my mate reckons Welbeck is probably the player opposing fans fear playing against the most from our squad, because of what you get from him physically. His energy and commitment, how difficult he is to muscle off the ball. A real handful.
Then he went onto to say "He reminds me of Yaya Toure". I didn't quite know what to make of that, but it didn't sound completely ridiculous when he gave his reasons. We agreed that we don't think Welbeck is anywhere near as good at striking the ball as Yaya, but he went on about how Webeck has the same direct approach to get the ball from his own half up towards the final third by being able to run with the ball and simultaneously shield it. He will often triumph in physical battles, winning the ball very cleanly in dangerous situations, and you will often find him covering most of the pitch, in both attack and defence.
If Welbeck wasn't a United lad, he reckons he'd take Danny over RvP or Rooney. What do you make of that? Is he demented, or can you see his logic? for me, whilst I can't ever see us doing an Alan Smith with Danny Welbeck, the comparison of traits isn't really that bonkers. I'd keep RvP and Rooney over him, but I feel harsh saying so considering how young he is and how much time he's got left to improve.