Red Pavan
shittest username ever manutddabest791
He actually reminds me of Theirry Henry, if we are talking comparisons.
Paulo Wanchope
I love this kid, pure passion and heart, and the 2nd happiest person in the world behind Chicharito. Thank god we have the surly Rooney and flatline Berbatov balance out the mood.
He's got so much to his game, but he doesn't skip the important part of assists and goals. In another year or two, injury permitting, he'll be an absolute star.
If Jones brain isn't damaged and Cleverley's ankle ever gets better, the future will be bright.
He should be. He is a striker.
Welbeck reminds me a bit of a young Shevchenko
#balancingitout
#ihatethisgaytwittershit
Correction. He is a striker being played out of position as a wide player. For you to expect him to suddenly switch from being a hunter of goals to a provider after less than even half a season in the role is unfair. It will take time. It hasn't dawned on him yet that he has a duty to provide chances for his team mates in the role he is currently employed in. The only role he will ever get a chance in to establish himself in the Chelsea first team. But the penny will drop eventually. It's not like he is totally incapable of creating things.Well no, at the moment he's a wide player and he's wasteful because he doesn't provide often enough for his team-mates.
After you having witnessed Ronaldo and Nani's development. I find it very strange you would say that...... I think it's easier to sort out Welbeck's problem than Sturridge's.
In much the same way that the team dynamic changed when we dropped Ruud for Saha, i reckon the team looks much more mobile and fluent with Welbeck in it. His movement is top drawer
One other thing, I think we may see him play more away games rather than Hernandez. Think his pace and hold-up play suits us better away from home, whereas Hernandez work in the box suit us better at home when the opposition sit back.
I think he must be the quickest player in the team now. He is an absolute beast of a player. Quick, strong and with sound technique. First team player on merit now and can only get better with experience.
Correction. He is a striker being played out of position as a wide player. For you to expect him to suddenly switch from being a hunter of goals to a provider after less than even half a season in the role is unfair. It will take time. It hasn't dawned on him yet that he has a duty to provide chances for his team mates in the role he is currently employed in. The only role he will ever get a chance in to establish himself in the Chelsea first team. But the penny will drop eventually. It's not like he is totally incapable of creating things.
After you having witnessed Ronaldo and Nani's development. I find it very strange you would say that.
I think its the other way around. Chicha makes our build up play suffer, which makes him less suited to a home game where we have to break the opposition down. Hes more suited to away games where the opposition has a go at us leaving them less compact and more vulnerable to hitting them on the counter.
I'm glad we've got players like Hernández and Berbatov on the bench, but on current form, Welbeck is class above them.
He needs to keep in the goals to go to the Euros. His battle with Sturrdidge for a place in the England squad (probably) is a nice little subplot to the season.
Saha comparisons are interesting because for me Welbeck at 21 is a far superior player than Saha was at the same age at Newcastle.
They're different and hard to compare. Sturridge is more direct, has a better eye for goal and is probably capable of that one bit of magic that can win you a game.
Welbeck is stronger and more of a physical threat, his build up play and first touch are much better and overall his footballing brain is superior. He just hasn't got that ruthlessness just yet.
They'd both compliment each other if they play on either wing for England, with Rooney playing upfront and dropping deep.
I love Welbeck, but i think Sturridge is a better player at this moment in time.
based on what?
Now this might be a wild guess, but I'm thinking based on goals and performances?
Crazy I know.
you know i wasn't even considering that. just felt there was absolutely no reason to factor that in
Well, now you know.
To be serious, whilst I rate Welbeck higher than Sturridge it's not exactly surprising that some rate Sturridge higher. He's had a very good 12 months during which time he's put in some really flashy performances and scored a lot of goals.
It seems that if you have flashy performances, that's enough to get you rated. Even when you have a solid performance and contribute well to the team, it's not enough unless you score goal or create an assist.
Lampard's performances against City wasn't great but just by him scoring the penalty he grabbed the headlines. Guess that's all it takes.
That's the way it is and always will be. Most people are influenced by goals, highlights on MotD and media hype at the end of the day.
You won't find many football fans (other than United fans) that rate Welbeck above Sturridge.
Why does he keep getting compared with Sturridge and unanimously branded the weaker player? Different players and Sturridge is one year older and has more experience. There's much more to come from Welbeck in the future seeing as he stays fit and keeps getting games.
Because they're both young English strikers breaking through at similar times.
It's an obvious and inevitable comparison.
Why does he keep getting compared with Sturridge and unanimously branded the weaker player? Different players and Sturridge is one year older and has more experience. There's much more to come from Welbeck in the future seeing as he stays fit and keeps getting games.