VancouverUtdFan
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2017
- Messages
- 2,514
- Supports
- Canucks + NE Patriots
In response to your first question I have two answers. He as an individual player has undoubtedly made massive improvements in recent years evident from his positioning, passing, dribbling and tackling - it's not as if he's the exact quality he was years ago and him being in an improved Spurs team has made him look better. So for that aspect yes he has improved as a player but to same point it is a hypothetical vagueness that honestly is really difficult to answer and is the risk with every single transfer. If hypothetically we bought Rose tomorrow then yes he would be a big improvement than if we bought Rose 3 summers ago but also I couldn't give you an guaranteed answer on if he would play at the level he does for Spurs, it's just a totally unknown factor. What I will say is that he wouldn't be 'bad' by any means, but there is the vagueness on if he would keep the same performance level, regress slightly or potentially play even better.
For your second question however you're better off asking a Tottenham fan like @GlastonSpur for an in-depth look at Rose.
Many thanks for the reply and yes I'll also await the response of a Spurs fan if they decide to chime in.
Nice to know from the sound of things he's progressed as an individual. Just curious because there are some players who just fit in with a certain environment perfectly and it just so happens to be when moved to another team they can never find that efficiency or form as they had prior. Some players just suit a certain team/manager and Rose is 27 years of age so just wanna know if that's the case with him or not, having revived his play at a later stage of his career (a late bloomer you can say) where it could potentially be the case.
Last edited: