CallyRed
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2009
- Messages
- 12,299
Dan really is a fantastic man
Depends what's in his contract which he and you'd imagine us have seen.Both claims now seem to be linked, Ashworth is claiming he was fired because they can't prove a resignation so now Newcastle are demonstrating he already had agreement with us.
Very doubtful they'll side on him being fired unless more comes out, written formal resignation isn't a legal requirement.
Still think they'll judge our compensation offer as more than fair though.
No way
I think it goes into arbitration next month.It will be difficult but how much time will it take? I guess we can't expect Ashworth to join before the window shuts. What happens to our summer window then? Actually, our desire to get a structure up and running? Is next season basically a write off while we try to sort out everything?
Again, I hope he is worth the troble.
Depends what's in his contract which he and you'd imagine us have seen.
I think it goes into arbitration next month.
If the email debacle suggests anything, it's that the structure is in place, with Berrada already acting in his role.
Surprised we haven't heard from Craig Hope-less yet.Has Lukecastle Edwards come along to say "actually Newcastle didn't want him" yet?
We all saw this coming. Guys at this level talk to each other and I’m sure Freedman has been onto Ashworth.
Newcastle is an attractive job, but you don’t want to be tied to them and their pettiness when a big club comes calling.
This is why I thought the email route was incredibly stupid, because sure it works for serious things like criminal activity, but you better have all your ducks in a row if you start being that petty. Seems like they don't and it could end up costing them.Interesting. It sounds as though Ashworth is claiming constructive dismissal, as he alleges that Newcastle did not follow proper procedures when they placed him on garden leave (which would constitute a breach of contract). If correct, it would be incredibly stupid of Newcastle.
This is why I thought the email route was incredibly stupid, because sure it works for serious things like criminal activity, but you better have all your ducks in a row if you start being that petty. Seems like they don't and it could end up costing them.
Yeah and it sounds like they will use the leaked emails as a reason they stuck him on gardening leave without the notice, the problem with that argument is that could be considered constructive dismissal.Interesting. It sounds as though Ashworth is claiming constructive dismissal, as he alleges that Newcastle did not follow proper procedures when they placed him on garden leave (which would constitute a breach of contract). If correct, it would be incredibly stupid of Newcastle.
For sure, it just seems very odd this all went public, as I can't imagine Newcastle will come out of this very good considering their original stance was £10m+.To be fair, you often see this kind of carry on (albeit less publicly) on the eve of legal proceedings. Each side tries to talk up their case, with promises of untold embarrassment for the opposing side if the proceeding is heard. It often ends with a last-minute settlement and I wouldn't be at all surprised if that's what transpires here. The piece in The Telegraph (from a journalist who is well-known to have close connections to NUFC) indicates that Newcastle intend to reopen negotiations on the eve of arbitration to see if the whole sorry mess can ultimately be avoided - don't rule out a compromise being reached regarding compensation with everyone walking away and a start date being secured for Ashworth.
Yeap, doesn't feel like we are signing a genius mastermind there.If true it doesn't exactly fill you with confidence that he's worth all the fuss. Basic stuff.
Fecking idiots
Just read it yeah, seems like we think we have a pretty solid case.
You would imagine that Ashworth has shown us his contract and we've looked over it and are reasonably confident what they did was wrong.
It just seems like posturing from Newcastle to get a deal agreed ahead of arbitration. They don't seem confident so are trying to control the narrative with this shite.seems like a very weak case to me if they have an email from him to United saying he wants to join us before we'd approached them, which it appears they do
that sounds like a reasonable response to finding out a director with confidential information about your company is planning on jumping ship to a rival
Fecking idiots
It just seems like posturing from Newcastle to get a deal agreed ahead of arbitration. They don't seem confident so are trying to control the narrative with this shite.
I think there is something to the claim that they didn't follow process correctly and effectively dismissed him. Seems to be making them nervous and trying to throw shit back.Yeah, it's a bit of posturing. They are never going to get the gardening leave to extend as long as they want, I'm sure they know that. But they have a solid case if the email reports are true, and are using this to attempt to up the compensation most likely. I don't think it's a bad idea either.
I agree with this.I'm sure we could have found a perfectly competent sporting director elsewhere for far less hassle than this. It really is in our DNA to do things the hard way.
I think there is something to the claim that they didn't follow process correctly and effectively dismissed him. Seems to be making them nervous and trying to throw shit back.
I don't see it that way. They did what they did irrespective of what Ashworth did (They weren't aware of it at the time)Well if the email reports are true they've done nothing wrong in my view. He broke the contract first. After that they have the right to dismiss him if they wish. But obviously they wouldn't do that as it removes all their claims to compensation, so they put him on gardening leave. Seems perfectly logical and sound.
If however they didn't/don't have that email, then I'd agree he has a case it wasn't due process.
I don't see it that way. They did what they did irrespective of what Ashworth did (They weren't aware of it at the time)
They are putting this out now to try and make us look bad becasue they know they fecked up initially. That's my read on it anyway.
It said in the article today they only recently discovered that it happened.How could you prove they weren't aware of it? He sent the email. They have access to his email. The email broke the contract.
Where exactly do you go from there? It's watertight.
The email, which was discovered during Newcastle’s preparation for the arbitration case, also included confidential information on the package paid to facilitate Ashworth’s move from Brighton to Newcastle.
It said in the article today they only recently discovered that it happened.
From the Athletic
It clearly does mate. Us taking them to arbitration is recent, they discovered the email in preparation of said arbitration.It doesn't say it was recently discovered and it would be a mistake to admit to that, so I doubt they did. It's gonna be impossible to argue they weren't aware of the tapping up before they took any actions. Everyone knows United tapped him up. After that preparing for such an outcome makes perfect sense from a legal standpoint.
I still don’t see why package paid to Brighton is such a confidential information.It said in the article today they only recently discovered that it happened.
From the Athletic
It's just Newcastle trying to moan.I still don’t see why package paid to Brighton is such a confidential information.
He is an employee and most employee reveal financial details of their current employment to potential employers.