Right. You're arguing City's FBs have purely defensive responsibilities?
They have CB’s playing inverted fullbacks which make them exceptionally hard to beat defensively whilst they are great at making passes - all the whilst not playing crosses like Frimpong or whoever you want.
And your arguing that AWB has purely defensive abilities here at United?
Again,
I don’t give a shit what you think - because your like Southgate, who will pick TAA or Frimpong against players like Mbappe, Mitoma , Saint Maximin, Neymar and watch them get bullied the whole match when there is a fullback who has proven to contain world class LW’s on top of their form.
If you don’t find that useful even as a squad option then that’s why your not a football manager.
Literally Ten Hag has every LB available to him in Shaw, Malacia and Dalot but has constantly picked AWB as his RB whilst changing his LB routinely.
If you don’t rate him fine, that’s your footballing brain - Ten Hag clearly rates him.
He talks about him after Burnley, after Sevilla first round, before the first game vs Arsenal etc.
I’m not saying that we shouldn’t go for our attacking RB version of Frimpong or TAA or whoever you are craving - but then letting go a defensive fullback who has a complete opposite game to an attacking fullback is just utter bullshit.
That’s not how you build a squad.
You don’t have 4 strikers and have them all playing like Yorke. You build a squad with Yorke, Cole, Ole & Sheringham - very different type of strikers.
The same with City - Haaland & Alvarez are two different type of strikers used in different ways and times against different opposition.
If you want to keep Dalot who is weak defensively and then go for an attacking RB on top then that’s how you view football I guess.
Dalot at LB is better than Malacia & arguably better than Dalot at RB aswell so I don’t think this will be a problem anyway.