But there's been more than a slight improvement in both of them. AWB was a complete write off at the start of the season and matched what are now lazy clichéd posts, since then, he's clearly taken the coaching on board and progressed a lot, relative to what he was. Does this mean he's now the full, polished article or not sometimes prone to the old errors and ways, no, but it does mean he's a lot more useful than he was expected to be on the offensive side of the halfway line. There's link up play, positional interchange and just an obviously coached, overall improvement that posters don't even seem to process in favour of remaining steadfast in a time piece that doesn't actually exist anymore, or certainly not in the manner nonchalantly/dismissively posted up.
I believe Dalot's injury has wrecked the season he was having, but the trajectory he himself was on is far removed from what it had been and yet posters type as though his good times or upswing never occurred, instead associating him purely with the player he was last season.
Ultimately, neither are what can be deemed elite full-backs, and it is fair to state that even their best form is that of an understudy to an elite RB, but simply playing down the progressions made and just time-locking them to the pre-coaching days makes it look like the posters doing so have simply written them off and therefore don't make any effort to observe ot credit them with anything.
It would be good to see discussion about the players they are now and not the players they were 5-6 months ago.
Incidentally, there are things AWB is better at than Dalot offensively, and ditto Dalot with AWB on the defensive end, so the blanket statements attached to them don't really tend to hold up to scrutiny anyway.