Alright Donald, enough of the phone for today.
Gaming Cyberpunk 2077 (PC, PS4/5, Xbox One)
- Thread starter DWelbz19
- Start date
Imagine shilling this game in 2024 as it's still unfinished.
Just blind consumerism.
Critics and users do not share your criticisms. The opposite in-fact. Post-PL DLC and corresponding overhaul patch with the entire reworking of perk and skill systens, police chases, random road gang chases and encounters, the addition of frame generation, to mention a few things, everyone in general is very highly positive and praiseworthy of the game.
It's ok to not like it. It's subjective for you. Most people aren't you.
And Steam reviews
Critics and users do not share your criticisms. The opposite in-fact. Post-PL DLC and corresponding overhaul patch with the entire reworking of perk and skill systens, police chases, random road gang chases and encounters, the addition of frame generation, to mention a few things, everyone in general is very highly positive and praiseworthy of the game.
It's ok to not like it. It's subjective for you. Most people aren't you.
And Steam reviews
Already appealing to mass of people as somekind of authority ? Why not just address the point that this game needs bike racing events.
This is gold. Holy shit.
Still don't need 4090 to render that, and it looks better.
ouchNo ouch intended btw. I care about this game almost on autistic level. It's more like needed reality check to devs to maybe sometimes try cutting budget on 60 year old Keanu Reeves and, and bring some content that will elevate them above Rockstar.
They did it with Witcher III, they can surely do it now, it's just gamers need to clamor for quality more, imo.
Next Cyberpunk probably in 2035, I'll be 153 and most likely soul trapped on a Commodore 64 floppy.
I still think the base game is incredibly average, personally. Or at least nowhere near as good as people claim it to be.
Phantom Liberty is awesome though, and basically everything the vanilla game should have been.
Phantom Liberty is awesome though, and basically everything the vanilla game should have been.
hardly going to do it in front her and her mum.Not with that attitude you're not...
Just ask the wife to leave the room
You don’t have to imagine. The game is brilliant and not unfinished at all unless you’re strangely obsessed with bike racing.
Blind consumerism is people paying for rubbish often cosmetic downloadable content on multiplayer games or the same FIFA experience that barely changes from year to year. This is just a great game that clicks for me.
Bike racing events is just a tip of the iceberg, they've cut down entire 2nd dlc and features that comes with it. The so called 'Moon' dlc completely scrapped and rumours are there were 3 big dlc's in mind.
If it helps you cope with the reality check, you can call me obsessed, and write stuff like yesterday, that I can jog off from the thread. Responses typical for the textbook rampant consumer zombie, and you kinda making that point for me.
Yeah becuase they had to fix the broken game they released in 2020. The DLC we did get was fantastic. I’m guessing you haven’t played it given you didn’t know it even had bikes FFS.
What do I have to cope with? I’m not the one blathering on a forum about bike racing in a game I hate. I had a blast with CP 2077 and have played it 5 times now. I only have to cope with negative things in my life rather than the positive ones.Hopefully I have to “cope” this much with CDPRs next game too
Yeah, they had to fix their own game, and in result they didn't finished it. You finally get it.
I just gave you examples of full story dlc that were cut down from the game.
Hopefully I have to “cope” this much with CDPRs next game too
You can't comprehend someone can have a critical thinking standpoint, you're unable to question the product, you just want consume. I get it.
Hi, does anybody here knows how to recover the double jump that was combine with sthg (I can remember what, I think with that special ankle) that allows to make great jumps and almost reach any building?.
After the upgrades I've lost that ability and I trully do not want to play it anyomre without it, I fecking hate that they fvck up that ability. I couldn't find anything remotely similar, some peopel said dash with sthg. but it ain't even remotely as easy to pull it out nor as great. Thanks in advance!
After the upgrades I've lost that ability and I trully do not want to play it anyomre without it, I fecking hate that they fvck up that ability. I couldn't find anything remotely similar, some peopel said dash with sthg. but it ain't even remotely as easy to pull it out nor as great. Thanks in advance!
Think they're called ripper docs. Think an update kind of broke existing characters cybernetics and you just have to reequip them.
Reinforced tenders from a ripper doc
It would be rather weird if they were fixing someone else’s game. They fixed it and finished it. That they made 1 DLC or 10 doesn’t change that.
You can have a critical standpoint just as someone can respond to those points. Seems you’re not able to take that. The difference is that I love the product (despite whatever flaws it has like most products) and you don’t. I have a more “critical standpoint” of games I didn’t enjoy.
That might be, I'll give a try to reequip them
like I've said above, I think I still have them in fact it wa froma particular ripper doc, that creepy bald fella, so I'll try that tip of reequip them and see what happens
Thanks to both! and I hope that it's not working on puropose because it was damn easy to reach many places with that combination
Nope. Story expands after the main campaign, and there was full DLC planned for that. The story of main campaign is not finished, and it shows by it's relative short length.
Your critical standpoint is telling me to get feck out of the thread and calling me obsessed, even when I'm giving you example, upon example of cut content from the game.
Don't try to spin it. I wrote what I think about the game and you started responding to my posts, you didn't like the criticism of the game, so you resorted to typical trash talk.
It’s a bit on the shorter side I agree but the side quests and multiple endings make up for it. I don’t think cut content makes a game necessarily incomplete - depends on your experience. If someone told me Outer Wilds was initially intended to have 12 planets instead of the 5-6 it wouldn’t change my view on it being one of the best games ever made, or cause to believe it to be incomplete.
Anyhoo I’ve put 100 hours into each play through of this.
You sound really affected by this game. Gaming is supposed to be fun. Not, whatever this is doing to you.
Gladly waited for all dlc's and some fixes, played it all and moved on. Very good game, could try mod it to add more flavour and lore, but these annoying new patches rectify compability. Twice the budget of Witcher III, and it's not entirely fulfilling experience, even despite neat performances from voice actors.
If only Outer Wilds had Cyberpunk's budget, we wouldn't need tripple A gaming. Then again, Annapurna Interactive dissolved, and this is what's really affecting me negatively, and probably the industry, as it needs that kind of devs.
On a contrary, I see what game really is, and not falling under it's illusion and marketing manipulations.
Outer Wilds didn’t need a bigger budget. It’s perfect just the way it is. Möbius Digital made it anyway, the absolute wizards.
Yes only you apparently see and say it like it is. What a hero.
Are the enemies still very bullet spongey?
Also still perplexed at the decision to make it a first person game
Also still perplexed at the decision to make it a first person game
In that case, it's good news. Hoping more of this type productions, rather than another generic open world like Valhalla.
If you use decent shotgun, nothing and no one feels too spongy, even on hard.
Well I still like it.
And have it so you see absolutely everything through the eyes of V, which apparently made the entire dev process incredibly complicated, a strange decision indeed.Are the enemies still very bullet spongey?
Also still perplexed at the decision to make it a first person game
Still arguing over Cyberpunk
Wait until their next game comes out. It's the Bethesda effect.
Wait until their next game comes out. It's the Bethesda effect.
Please leave us first person perspective lovers alone... almost every game is 3rd person these days, just leave us something you greedy fecks.
1st person perspective was the right choice, imo.
The game world was designed with an impressive level of verticality and scale. You get the benefit of that best when you utilise 1st person, rather than 3rd person perspective.
What is the illusion and marketing manipulation you speak of, and why did almost every major critic fall prey to it at PL DLC and base game overhaul patch and offer it unanimous and overwhelming praise? That's a disparity between your experience, and the vast majority of professional video game critics, is it not?
Isn't this what general consensus is for? Isn't that why we go to websites such as Metacritic? For when critics and users alike both agree that something is excellent, whether it's a film, TV series, or video game, then it can be reliably stated that is fulfills the criteria of being sufficiently good enough to warrant praise.
What's the alternative?
The alternative is that I'm wrong, @amolbhatia50k is wrong, SkillUp is wrong, the vast majority of Steam PC users (who apparently don't need 4090's to have a great experience, hence the review) are wrong, the overwhelmingly positive professional critics are wrong, the majority of positive RedCafe experiences are wrong, the majority positive user scores on a number of platforms and websites are wrong. Everyone's wrong.
Except Van Piorsing.
I don't even know why I even have a Rotten Tomatoes, IMDB, Letterbox'd or Metacritic account. I don't even know why I bother consulting the "masses", when all I have to do is consult Van Piorsing, who is apparently the arbiter of all that is altogether good and right.
"Professional video game critics"
feck sake, that one had me more than the earlier "frame generation" post.
Great work, I'm a fan!
feck sake, that one had me more than the earlier "frame generation" post.Great work, I'm a fan!
"Professional video game critics"
Great work, I'm a fan!
Why address the fact that most people in the gaming space love the game when you can nitpick your own subjective shtick.
I remember you from TLOU original thread telling everyone that it was underwhelming and not great when everyone else was praising it to high heaven. You got a rep, chief.
Oh stop you, I'm already onside!Why address the fact that most people in the gaming space love the game when you can nitpick your own subjective shtick.
I remember you from TLOU original thread telling everyone that it was underwhelming and not great when everyone else was praising it to high heaven. You got a rep, chief.
Oh stop you, I'm already onside!
No VAR check either.
Good. Those clowns are even less qualified than video game journalists.
I feel like every game is 1st person. I would have preferred if they let us roam in 3rd person so I can see my gear but the combat is good in 1st person