Stretch
Full Member
Ah well, if Barca's still in for him then he will end up there.
Some people are saying he's like Nani, plenty of skill and pace but inconsistent, crap decision making and only makes a pass about 4 times a match, is that true?
Doesn't matter...barca want him.
Hope we get Di Maria then.
Weren't Barcelona meant to be suspended from transfers or have I dreamt this?
Ridiculous, as I said one rule for them and another for everyone else!Yes they allegedly broke the rules of signing up minors and got sentenced by suspending them from doing any transferbusiness for 2 successive windows but they appealed it and until verdict has been reached about that appeal their suspension got lifted so they are free to make signings this summer.
The reason why they are doing so much business is because they god damn know they broke those rules and their appeal won't be succesfull, it is just a trick to buy them some time, lift the suspension for this summer and do all their business and also the business they planned for the winter and next summer all at once.
It's the same rule for everyone, a club is allowed to buy players whilst their appeal is ongoing.Ridiculous, as I said one rule for them and another for everyone else!
Ridiculous, as I said one rule for them and another for everyone else!
That would be a pretty incredible window for Barcelona.So Barca could get Suarez, Rakitic, Cuadrado, Vermaelen and Mathieu this summer = 160m - 65m in sales = 95m. Ridiculous business. That's Euros too. One of those is one of the best players in the world, two are brilliant players and the other two are solid additions. This is on top of having the best player in the world already + Neymar + Iniesta + Busquets.
Meanwhile, we've spent 60m on two players - an 18 year old LB and a better-than-most-but-not-top-level midfielder. And we have lost Evra, Vidic and Rio, all practically for free. And we still have a threadbare central defence and midfield, and no wingers (at least, no good ones). We can't shift Fellaini, Nani or Hernandez...
We're not very good at this transfer lark.
Our window obviously isn't over, Cuadrado hasn't signed for Barcelona and Vermaelen is shite. Judge it when the window shuts.So Barca could get Suarez, Rakitic, Cuadrado, Vermaelen and Mathieu this summer = 160m - 65m in sales = 95m. Ridiculous business. That's Euros too. One of those is one of the best players in the world, two are brilliant players and the other two are solid additions. This is on top of having the best player in the world already + Neymar + Iniesta + Busquets.
Meanwhile, we've spent 60m on two players - an 18 year old LB and a better-than-most-but-not-top-level midfielder. And we have lost Evra, Vidic and Rio, all practically for free. And we still have a threadbare central defence and midfield, and no wingers (at least, no good ones). We can't shift Fellaini, Nani or Hernandez...
We're not very good at this transfer lark.
So Barca could get Suarez, Rakitic, Cuadrado, Vermaelen and Mathieu this summer = 160m - 65m in sales = 95m. Ridiculous business. That's Euros too. One of those is one of the best players in the world, two are brilliant players and the other two are solid additions. This is on top of having the best player in the world already + Neymar + Iniesta + Busquets.
Meanwhile, we've spent 60m on two players - an 18 year old LB and a better-than-most-but-not-top-level midfielder. And we have lost Evra, Vidic and Rio, all practically for free. And we still have a threadbare central defence and midfield, and no wingers (at least, no good ones). We can't shift Fellaini, Nani or Hernandez...
We're not very good at this transfer lark.
Our window obviously isn't over, Cuadrado hasn't signed for Barcelona and Vermaelen is shite. Judge it when the window shuts.
Meh, a great player, but if we could get Di Maria for about £10m more, I'd rather we just pay the extra money honestly. Fiorentina are asking too much imo.
I'm not buying that LvG is choosing between Cuadrado or Di Maria. I really can't see Di Maria performing the wing back role.I would rather have Di Maria to be honest but I only place down to the fact I've never seen this guy play for his club only Colombia.
I'm not buying that LvG is choosing between Cuadrado or Di Maria. I really can't see Di Maria performing the wing back role.
Cuadrado has experience playing full-back, I'd imagine he is better defensively than di Maria.No? Why not? Cuadrado is no better defensively and they both have energy to burn.
Cuadrado has experience playing full-back, I'd imagine he is better defensively than di Maria.
There's still no doubting that Cuadrado is better suited to the wing-back role right now than di Maria.He's not. The majority of his games were higher up the pitch. I've seen him play second striker more than I've seen him play wing back for Fiorentina. Di Maria played cm for Madrid for most of last season, not like he didn't need to defend.
Didn't Cuadrado used to be an out and out right back?He's not. The majority of his games were higher up the pitch. I've seen him play second striker more than I've seen him play wing back for Fiorentina. Di Maria played cm for Madrid for most of last season, not like he didn't need to defend.
There's still no doubting that Cuadrado is better suited to the wing-back role right now than di Maria.
It's a pointless conversation really anyway, as there's noway we'd buy di Maria to play as a wing-back.I wouldn't say that at all. Di Maria hasn't been played in such a formation so you can't come to the conclusion that he'd be worse in the role just by that. Di Maria has all the attributes necessary to be a great wing back, pace, stamina, crossing and decent defensive ability. If Young can play wing back successfully, Di Maria definitely can. Cuadrado only played wing back for Colombia because it was the only way to get their best players involved and to use his stamina and pace. He didn't exactly offer much in defence though.
Didn't Cuadrado used to be an out and out right back?
It's a pointless conversation really anyway, as there's noway we'd buy di Maria to play as a wing-back.
Because we're not going to break our transfer record for a player our manager has already labeled a world class winger only to play him out of position, somewhere he's never played before, at wing-back.But why not? It would be a way to get another world class player in the team and his pace would allow him to get past defenders and his delivery is excellent so would likely lead to a number of chances for our forwards. I don't understand why you'd think he's a worse option for wing back than Cuadrado other than the fact that he hasn't been allowed to play the role up to now.
Because we're not going to break our transfer record for a player our manager has already labeled a world class winger only to play him out of position, somewhere he's never played before, at wing-back.
That's because Bale has developed in to one of the best attacking players in the world and it would be a waste of talent playing him at LB again. I'm sure he'd still be a very effective player there though, just as I believe Cuadrado would be at RWB.He might have when he was younger, but not that I know of. Worth pointing out that Bale started as a left back. Playing him as a wing back now would seem insane. Cuadrado's definitely not great defensively, I've seen him enough to come to this conclusion. I'd actually argue Di Maria is better defensively tbh.
So Barca could get Suarez, Rakitic, Cuadrado, Vermaelen and Mathieu this summer = 160m - 65m in sales = 95m. Ridiculous business. That's Euros too. One of those is one of the best players in the world, two are brilliant players and the other two are solid additions. This is on top of having the best player in the world already + Neymar + Iniesta + Busquets.
Meanwhile, we've spent 60m on two players - an 18 year old LB and a better-than-most-but-not-top-level midfielder. And we have lost Evra, Vidic and Rio, all practically for free. And we still have a threadbare central defence and midfield, and no wingers (at least, no good ones). We can't shift Fellaini, Nani or Hernandez...
We're not very good at this transfer lark.
Not to say we've had a great transfer window, but I don't think Barcelona's window would have been all that great even if they do sign Cuadrado. Mathieu and Vermaelen isn't doing much to solve their CB issues. RB is still a major issue for them. Their attack will still be extremely narrow as Suarez does nothing to provide width by operating in the same areas Messi and Neymar. Sure they improved the squad a bit, but I still don't fancy them in Europe.
If the window closed today Bayern would have to be the strong favorites for the Champions League IMO. Real's summer transfer window seemingly was a plan to create imbalance in the squad and mess up the identity Ancelotti had forged last year. Shoehorning James and Kroos into the side while losing Di Maria (epically stupid even for Real) and pushing two of Modric, Khedira and Alonso to the bench should be hilarious to watch. Isco and Illaramendi will struggle for opportunities in the starting XI and will likely have to be content making substitute appearances. This is another squad, like Barcelona, that could have used a quality CB signing.
Obviously I would much rather have the problems that Barcelona and Madrid face, but I also would expect the board in both of those situations to have found long-term solutions to problems, rather than replicating skill sets and strengthening areas and positions that don't need it.
Ronaldo - Benzema - Bale
James
Kroos Alonso/Modric/Khedira
If any of this constitutes a problem, I'd hate to think what position you think we're in!
He's not even in the squad for Fiorentina's game, going on right now...