If he is going to cost 40 mil euros, why not sign Di Maria for 10-15 mil more. I am not all convinced with this player even after the world cup that he is a top class player to warrant that price.
With the resurgence of Young and the fact TBT is Teflon I can't see this one happening, it kind of feels like Fiorentina are using us to jack the price up for Barca.
Exactly. Ashley Young is an option at right wing back/right or left wing. We'd be silly to not pass up on someone we think right for the position because we have Ashley Young.Would Barcelona not have bought Dani Alves if they had Ashley Young at right wingback?
Where are you going to play Mata, RvP, Rooney and Di Maria?
It seems this guy is absolutely perfect for the wing back role.
Exactly, which dumbasses would do that?!Yeah, nobody is gonna pay that for a world cup flash in the pan.
Di Maria in the CM role he played for madrid or as a winger in a 4-3-3?
Him and Herrera in the CM role would be unbalanced IMO. We are also likely to play 5-3-2 more this season.
Van Gaal on Cuadrado:
"I can't speak about Cuadrado, because if I'd say something about him, his price would increase".
No denial.
Agree with that, I would play him instead of Herrera if needed with a more combative AM. I was pointing out that we can give him 20 odd appearances this season by playing him as a CM,winger or even in the robben role in a 5-3-2. If our long term plan is to move to a 4-3-3 he really is too good to miss out due to one season of the squad being unbalanced.
Where is the article these quotes supposedly come from? I have seen nothing in the English press. If Van Gaal said something like that the Sun, The Mail, everyone would be running it.
He said that, but without reference to Cuadrado. He said something like, "I can't talk about players..."
So, really, Van Gaal said some generic stuff about transfers and someone decided he was talking about Cuadrado? Guess that's the internet for you...
That's how I read it. Apparently, he said it after the Liverpool game - he was not talking specific players though.
Fair points tbh. Depends on what van gaal's strategy is long time. I definitely think he's gettable considering PSG's struggles to complete a deal for him.
You are right about him being pretty young and if need be his position can be changed but to me he seems a proper left back. A full back, that is. His crossing was quite ok last season if I remember correctly even if not great, the issue in his games so far for us is that he is playing wingback which is a lot different and you need genuine attacking instincts of a wide player which are not always present even in attacking fullbacks.The middle of the back 3. I think he'd be brilliant in that role. His biggest weakness at the moment is his crossing, which wouldn't be an issue in a back 3. He could be amazing with the freedom to start attacks from deep and you'd never catch him out with a bit of pressing. The lad's only 19... he doesn't have a nailed down position yet. This could be it. He just looks like more of a defender than an attacker to me.
Then you don't know how good he is. He would fix a huge problem on that right side, more so if we stick to the 3-4-1-2 formation as he's got experience as a right wing back.He is not worth £30m, it would be a waste of valuable funds.
He is not worth £30m, it would be a waste of valuable funds.
Then you don't know how good he is. He would fix a huge problem on that right side, more so if we stick to the 3-4-1-2 formation as he's got experience as a right wing back.
He is not worth £30m, it would be a waste of valuable funds.
Got it from an Italian site ,could have got lost in translation .The Star are running with it ,which means it's nonsense.Where is the article these quotes supposedly come from? I have seen nothing in the English press. If Van Gaal said something like that the Sun, The Mail, everyone would be running it.
Got it from an Italian site ,could have got lost in translation .The Star are running with it ,which means it's nonsense.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/fo...Louis-Van-Gaal-fears-Juan-Cuadrado-price-hike
Those quotes have been edited. They were in the Express. Supposedly, that's what he said after the Liverpool game but this is what he actually said:Van Gaal on Cuadrado:
"I can't speak about Cuadrado, because if I'd say something about him, his price would increase".
No denial.
I would never make that mistake on Football Manager.I'm pretty sure the club are well aware of what's available and wont buy one player without leaving enough money for any other they may want to bring in. This isn't Football Manager.
Really don't understand these rumours, especially if we're going to play a 3-5-2. Granted he could possibly be a better option at right wing back than Rafael and Valencia, surely the 30M could go to a position of more priority?
I think Zaha is on his way out along with Nani, leaving us with Valencia and Young as the wingers playing as wing backs. Where Young has improved, Valencia still looks like a rabbit in headlights going forwards not the most convincing attacking threat even if he can get into the right positions.Why is it one or the other? Spending £30m on Cuadrado wouldn't necessarily mean we won't spend on other positions.
because we'll be playing him in defenceIf he is going to cost 40 mil euros, why not sign Di Maria for 10-15 mil more. I am not all convinced with this player even after the world cup that he is a top class player to warrant that price.
Would Barcelona not have bought Dani Alves if they had Ashley Young at right wingback?