barros
Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Pele had a great shotPele wasn't as good in the air, wasn't as fast as Ronaldo and wasn't as strong as ronaldo. He also didn't have as good of a shot as cristiano.
Pele had a great shotPele wasn't as good in the air, wasn't as fast as Ronaldo and wasn't as strong as ronaldo. He also didn't have as good of a shot as cristiano.
It will never happen, Ronaldo simply isnt in that mould which are usually referred to as greatest of all time. Pele, Maradona, Cruyff, Di Stefano and Messi, all these players share one thing in common - they are very complete attacking players. They could do everything and actually did a lot more than Ronaldo does over 90 minutes. All those players had great scoring ability and creativity but most importantly the ability to dominate a game by being at the heart of it the whole time. Ronaldo would always be in the bracket of the likes of Eusebio, Puskas, Ronaldo Fenomeno, etc, which isn't a bad company to have but the ones who would affect a game mainly through their goal threat despite having other qualities while the former group could assume most roles needed to influence a game and even if they don't score they would be able to tilt the game in the favour of their side.
doesn't make it any sort of excuse. why can messi provide to di maria?
Ronaldo is much more than a striker, let alone a goal poacher. The only footballer in Europe who was capable of scoring 50+ goals several seasons in a row was Gerd Müller. And he was only a goal poacher. Fat Ronaldo managed only 48 in his best season in Spain. And he was bloody fantastic in that season. C. Ronaldo isn't even a centre forward, he doesn't play as a main striker. Don't tell me that Benzema plays as a second striker ot something.
To score so many golas in several consecutive seasons without playing as a centre forward is an achievment that only Messi has matched in Europe. And Ronaldo is much more creative than some fans are able to realize. He was one of the most creative players in the world season 2006/07, if not the most creative. Having in mind this season, it would be a complete travesty to present his as a footballer who can be world class only when it comes to scoring goals. Short memories, etc. Those who say that he isn't a great dribbler any more do not watch him enough. He can be fantastic with the ball at his feet.
He is quite a good passer actually, this is a bit of a myth I don't quite understand... If he wasn't a good passer then how has he just overtaken Ozil, who is supposed to be a passing god, on the assists for Real Madrid?
And how is he not a complete footballer then if he has pace, strength, long shot, short shot, a leap both feet, technique and agility? Am I missing something to make him not complete?
This old he only scores goals in games of football chestnut.
He also assists non stop but no, he doesn't have football intelligence.
Which is fine because he is so good at what he does and he did score the goals that got you there. But once you critique him on here at all, there is uproar. I've made an effort to watch more of him this season and I fully agree wth you.
He is an amazing player but anyone who can't see these weaknesses doesn't watch him enough.
I think Ronaldo's strengths and weaknesses were well illustrated in the Portuguese run to the world cup. Being our best player (well, he is at Madrid too, but it's a lesser difference towards the 2nd bests) and having unique status all offensive duties were up to him and the product was absolutely nothing. In the match against Sweden, circumstances forced us to play a bit more like Madrid, he ran free up front, and was absolutely devastating.
The play making and creative elements of his game are relatively weak, he's raw power and finishing prowess taken to insane heights.
It baffles me as an argument. Messi has surpassed him with pretty much every barometer we have to measure footballers and he's younger. Why can't Ronaldo ve appreciated without measuring him aagainst a clearly superior footballer.
Did you just use RAWK to strengthen your argument?When even his used-to-be biggest haters over at RAWK are discussing this heavily (see their Ronaldo thread in the general forum) with things going 50/50, you have to say many more people are in disagreement when you bring the argument as clear-cut as you did there .... HALA RONALDOEEEE.
Liverpool and Arsenal fans are bitter about Ronaldo. That neither club has never had a player of his quality in their ranks grates for them. They like to downplay his brilliance.
It baffles me as an argument. Messi has surpassed him with pretty much every barometer we have to measure footballers and he's younger. Why can't Ronaldo ve appreciated without measuring him aagainst a clearly superior footballer.
Oh Snipers you're so bitter.People forget he is two years younger than Ronaldo as well.
Every player has that unique quality that distinguishes them from the rest. Ronaldo can't playmake like Messi, or doesn't look as good on the ball as Iniesta, or can't defend as well as O'Shea. So? He is a key player for one of the best clubs in the world, and has been consistent since 2006. I don't think his name can be placed next to Pele, Maradona, Cryuff... but apart from leading Real to the Decima, or taking Portugal deep into the World Cup, I can't think of anything else he can do to elevate his status. He's solidly in that tier below, and fyi, he's the better Ronaldo.
"Score less goals, and become a playmaker, because some hipster rubbish"
Messi is arguably the best player ever. The fact that Ronaldo has managed to win two Ballon d'Ors during Messi's reign already speaks volumes about the Portuguese. In comparison with Messi he isn't particularly creative. That's true. But Messi is a genius in that respect. Ronaldo has the ability to be quite creative though. Season 06/07 proves it quite clearly. But his close control and ability to pass the ball aren't close to Messi's level. Still, it would be quite interesting to see how Ronaldo would do in that Barcelona team. It's obvious that Messi has played with better players than Ronaldo. Barca's midfield is far superior to United's and Madrid's. Who knows, maybe with a midfield like Barca's Ronaldo would have scored not 50+ but, say, 65+ goals several seasons in a row.
Maybe he has lost something. Some players indeed lose some of their qualities. I'm not sure this is true of Ronaldo though. It is his ambition to outscore Messi which stands in the way of his creativity. Should he decide that creating chances is no less valuable than scoring goals, he could be quite creative again. That's very hypothetical though.
I think it's a bit more simple than that. His ambition is to outscore the other team that's playing against him and he wants to score more. It's some sort of lunacy that Ronaldo wants to outshine Messi and that's why he takes so many shots, it's how he plays, get used to it. Messi has done similar things, trying to play every game without being substituted, playing for the record too. He did it for the record, not to outshine Ronaldo. It's a football rivalry, not some romcom situation gone wrong.
I'm debating the view that Ronaldo isn't creative, I'm not saying that he should try to be more creative.
All of that is so speculative, you must read the papers every morning and it must change your life, the amount of 'truths' your told....
Or, perhaps you don't know feck all about Messi's character and why he does what he does, you can only piece it together and come up with a theory (Such as he's not trying to outshine Ronnie) but in truth, you haven't got a Scooby doo mate, none of us have
You think he is better than Maradona Messi Pele then?
No ones downplaying his ability, just saying he isn't in that class which a lot of United posters agree with.
Eh what? So Treble knows Ronaldo's character that he wants to outshine Messi? It's a speculation on his part too, unless you are saying you are mates with Ronaldo?
No, I'm not but he seemed to pose it as his opinion, to which you came in and almost corrected, not offering a different opinion, anyway, not important.
I've edited my post, but it his line of 'his ambition is to outscore Messi' didn't sound like a question at all. All I'm saying is, there is a rivalry between Messi and Ronaldo and Ballon D'or matters to both the players. Messi plays in a Barcelona team in a system that worked well for them and they play to his strengths as well, as Real Madrid play to Ronaldo's strengths. It's completely fair on both teams as they have once in a life time talent on their hands. It's a bit bonkers to say, Ronaldo should change his style of play to match Messi and Barcelona's style of play.
Why does he need to be as creative? Few of these all time greats people talk about but rarely watched regularly could match Ronaldo's goalscoring. How many of them where as good in the area Ronaldo excels?Nobody said he isn't creative. The point is he is not as creative as the all time greats people try and put him up there with. Those players were able to score and create at the very highest level and they proved it. Ronaldo hasn't done so, he had a fantastic balance here 06/07 does stick out the passes he used to play through. I feel as he as he has gotten older he has become goal obsessed now.
Regardless they are two of the best I have seen
I feel they both drive each other on, but for me Ronaldo is chasing Messi while Messi is chasing history. I don't think he can NEVER be good as Messi but he is 29 now, as long as he is scoring goals and winning trophies does he really even need to change?