You're confusing it with the player performance forum, which is only for United players.
That might very well be the case. Happy to be corrected.
You're confusing it with the player performance forum, which is only for United players.
Bravo.His favourite siuuupermarket is Sainsburys
You can't pretend you want the conversation to end and then make "outlandish claims" like this. What do you think a journalist's job is? Der Spiegel is one of the most reputable newspapers in the world and has covered scandals on a much higher scale than Cristiano Ronaldo. They have history of acknowledging mistakes and amending articles when evidence comes out they were wrong or misled, yet they have never done so about Ronaldo's case. Why do you think that is?Look, this will be the last post I make on this topic. You guys have derailed this thread long enough, and I have been guilty of partaking in the nonsense.
The difference between the Ronaldo case and Greenwood is pretty obvious, in Greenwood's case we have actual pictures and audio which makes it much more visceral. In Ronaldo's case it is the case of "he said she said" combined with this famous questionnaire that was leaked by criminals and cannot be verified either way.
Just read he said he still loves United.feck it, he’s got me again
this is one of my childhood heroes don’t care if he’s a bozo now he gave me too many happy moments
January return?
January return?
F***kAs manager maybe
January return?
That would be a right clusterfeck.As manager maybe
He'd never go for that.As manager maybe
Are those fanboys or bots in the comments? Genuinely confused.
January return?
Probably not.Wonder if he'll ever admit his actions were wrong.
He's sullied his image with a lot of United fans I believe. Especially on here.
Nope. And it‘s the fanciest pyramid scheme there is. Tom Brady also endorses them.Ah, so now he's supporting a pyramid scheme.
Is there no depth to his depravity?
And messiNope. And it‘s the fanciest pyramid scheme there is. Tom Brady also endorses them.
Not that I don’t agree with the likely claim that Ronaldo is a rapist but:You can't pretend you want the conversation to end and then make "outlandish claims" like this. What do you think a journalist's job is? Der Spiegel is one of the most reputable newspapers in the world and has covered scandals on a much higher scale than Cristiano Ronaldo. They have history of acknowledging mistakes and amending articles when evidence comes out they were wrong or misled, yet they have never done so about Ronaldo's case. Why do you think that is?
The very reason we are still discussing this is because it's systematically handwaved by people weirdly invested in defending Ronaldo's reputation. There is no logical reason for "any person with half a brain" to discredit esteemed journalists' work in favor of some accused's lawyer, but here we are yet again - you keep misrepresenting the situation and then complain about the push back.
January return?
I'm not a fan of the guy at all, but he's not wrong, in all fairness.
When did ten Hag even say something like that? Wasn't it Bruno?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/sampil...winning-the-premier-league-says-erik-ten-hag/“And I knew when I started that it was going to be a tough job. There are a lot of people who have advised me about that.”
“We want this club back to where it was more than a decade ago, to a club that wins the Premier League, which can win Champions Leagues. We are really a long way away from that.”
“I think we’ve taken steps since then, otherwise we wouldn’t have won two prizes either. But we are not yet so far that a ‘winning culture’ already prevails here in all respects. Our standards, our norms and values, still need to go up.”
Sounds like you’re dismissing them, because you don’t like their reporting. Regarding investigative journalism, they are top notch.Not that I don’t agree with the likely claim that Ronaldo is a rapist but:
To me Der Spiegel is trash tier and they constantly make shit up in my field of work and cite “unnamed sources”, cut and snip quotes out of context serve their agenda.
They even had a journalist who went around making shit up for half a decade running stories that were a figment of his imagination, completely making up characters, plots, stories that didn’t happen. Every single one of these stories passed (somehow) the magazines internal source checking and verification department.