KM
I’m afraid I just blue myself
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2008
- Messages
- 49,917
Lalit Modi is a twat. He's the one who started all this.
There is so much of nonsense going on in the BCCI.
Isn't Srinivasan supposed to take over as the head of ICC or something sometime soon? In which case, I'm guessing he's just waiting to assume that position so that he can somehow safeguard himself from all these charges.
Peter Moores again for England then
Exactly how I feelNot overly enthused but hey at least it's not Giles!!!
Exactly how I feel
WASP, on the other hand, differs and gives us a predicted score in the first innings and the probability of a team winning the match in the second essay. It doesn’t just take the match situation into the equation but also factors like the team’s past record are very important parameters in its calculation.
For example, take a India vs Kenya game where India need 100 to win in 10 overs with 5 wickets in hand. In a normal match situation between two closely-matched teams, the bowling team will be favourites there but with India being a much superior team, WASP would give India a higher probability for victory.
Also, this system takes the pitch and conditions into consideration. Hence, if India need to 100 to win from 10 overs in the sub-continent – the WASP percentage would be much higher than when India find themselves in a similar situation in a country like South Africa, where the Men in Blue have a poor record against the Proteas in limited overs cricket.
Just need another gun batsmen at the top and a proper spinner and we'll have ourselves a proper T20 team. Tredwell's T20 bowling stats are horrific.
Been reading some papers' reports that Cook is perceived as acceptable to sponsors given his pedigree, and so makes a perfect captain from a marketing, if not a cricketing perspective. Any truth to this, in your opinion? The English team just seems so white-bread and focused more on getting in guys who fit a particular mold than people who can play. Would a Mitchell Johnson or a David Warner be brought back to the English team under its current management?The Cook interview on Sky at the minute shows you whats wrong with English cricket at the minute. Boring, dour, uninspiring.
Been reading some papers' reports that Cook is perceived as acceptable to sponsors given his pedigree, and so makes a perfect captain from a marketing, if not a cricketing perspective. Any truth to this, in your opinion? The English team just seems so white-bread and focused more on getting in guys who fit a particular mold than people who can play. Would a Mitchell Johnson or a David Warner be brought back to the English team under its current management?
Anyone here read Bookie, Gambler, Fixer, Spy?