Cop in America doing a bad job, again

The bold part is not necessarily true, but I agree there should be a set universal standard.
And it wasn't the making academies longer that I said wasn't feasible. It was having a centralized police force and training in a 2-3 year university-style setting that I don't think is logistically possible. I'm guessing it would be like FBI x100000? How would that look like and work?
Well, service academies (West Point, Annapolis, etc) already give us a model... and a European country is typically roughly the size of some US state.

Beef up the statewide academies, have a set standard of policing that is taught, run it like a service academy, send graduates out to places within the state as needed.

Will it take time to replace the "old guard"? Yes. Will we wind up with a better trained police force eventually? Also yes.
 
Every first world country does it. It would be change the police system and US has the resources. I can't understand american exceptionalism. We can't have police academies, we can't get rid of guns, we can't get universal health care, we can't get affordable post-secondary education.

It is possible, there is no will
You're going off tangents but do tell how it is possible? What specific changes are you saying should be implemented to the entire country and system? And how would that trickle down and effect each city big or small? each county? each state?
 
Well, service academies (West Point, Annapolis, etc) already give us a model... and a European country is typically roughly the size of some US state.

Beef up the statewide academies, have a set standard of policing that is taught, run it like a service academy, send graduates out to places within the state as needed.

Will it take time to replace the "old guard"? Yes. Will we wind up with a better trained police force eventually? Also yes.

At least it would allow more uniformity and an easier way to control the general mentality. But in the US I could see a big problem, politically it would be used as an example of authoritarianism with the police likened to a state "army".
 
Take a small chunk of the stupidly enormous military budget and reform the police from the ground up. The cost isn’t an issue, as has already been said it’s the lack of a will to do anything about it.
 
Well, service academies (West Point, Annapolis, etc) already give us a model... and a European country is typically roughly the size of some US state.

Beef up the statewide academies, have a set standard of policing that is taught, run it like a service academy, send graduates out to places within the state as needed.

Will it take time to replace the "old guard"? Yes. Will we wind up with a better trained police force eventually? Also yes.
Thanks! Yea I would be supportive of that. @Skizzo works for the state so he would have more insight into a state-run academy and how they send out officers in a big state like CA.
 
At least it would allow more uniformity and an easier way to control the general mentality. But in the US I could see a big problem, politically it would be used as an example of authoritarianism with the police likened to a state "army".
The conservatives would be in a condundrum... stuck between their "I support the police" mentality and their "fear" of "big government".

See, conservatives typically are supportive of town and county police forces, and in many states even the state police forces. It isn't until you get to the federal level that the suddenly forget about the "thin blue line" and start with the Gestapo analogies.
 
Take a small chunk of the stupidly enormous military budget and reform the police from the ground up. The cost isn’t an issue, as has already been said it’s the lack of a will to do anything about it.

The biggest issue, while I don't disagree with you, is how politically interwoven any law enforcement agency (local, state, and federal) is with local politicians, government, union, and lobbyists. The entire system is fecked up and one section of change will not make a difference.
 
Well, service academies (West Point, Annapolis, etc) already give us a model... and a European country is typically roughly the size of some US state.

Beef up the statewide academies, have a set standard of policing that is taught, run it like a service academy, send graduates out to places within the state as needed.

Will it take time to replace the "old guard"? Yes. Will we wind up with a better trained police force eventually? Also yes.

Those cops that killed Floyd didnt kill him because they lack training.

Because they want to hurt him.

Unlesd training can erase hatred then they'll at best learn to avoid getting caught better
 
Those cops that killed Floyd didnt kill him because they lack training.

Because they want to hurt him.

Unlesd training can erase hatred then they'll at best learn to avoid getting caught better
...
I'm not saying that's the issue with regards to Minnesota. I'm commenting on the discussion that is currently being had in the thread about the stark difference in police training in the US (a few months) vs. some countries in Europe (a couple to a few years).
 
Those cops that killed Floyd didnt kill him because they lack training.

Because they want to hurt him.

Unlesd training can erase hatred then they'll at best learn to avoid getting caught better
Strictly from a training perspective though, there is a whole lot wrong the officers did.
 
If I need to explicitly tell you that kneeling your full weight on a persons neck will likely have a negative impact on their livelihood then I don’t think a career ‘protecting & serving’ is for you.

The man was killed because the officers have prejudices that run deeply through American society.

You don’t train away racism.
 
Strictly from a training perspective though, there is a whole lot wrong the officers did.

There’s not a single thing right.

At the most basic level, it is, at absolute best criminally negligent.

There’s very little training that comes into this case in my opinion. It wasn’t a taught training technique exhibited badly, and I don’t think anyone could argue a trained police officer anywhere on earth wouldn’t know that applying crushing force on someone’s neck in that position is a monumentally poor idea. That leaves very little room other than to call it what it is - murder/manslaughter.

Admittedly I’ve only watched a short part of the video, I found it hugely upsetting, but what I saw, and what I have read and seen in other angles is someone who wanted to be seen by everyone else to have put that man down, a kind of I’m the big man, I’m in control to the absolute max and most horrible degree.

His specific intent as far as how much harm he thought he was causing and how race played into it is impossible for me to gauge.

However a police officer simply has to do a million times better than that. It’s a position of such responsibly and such wanton and mindless disregard for that poor man is beyond the pale.

I know you’re not supporting them at all and just answering questions honestly which I appreciate.

Without ,admittedly, any expertise in the American Policing situation, it just seems so patently apparent that there is a massive endemic, cultural issue with regards use of force and racism - both seperately and all too often in combination.

Do you find that disheartening? I’m sure there are a great many very competent, empathetic and good police officers in America but it does seem there’s a real reluctance to call it as it is and I wonder how much that cements the issues.
 
@choiboyx012 weren't they supposed to put him in the back of their car? The other issue is that none of them is monitoring what is happening behind them, the four officers are oriented in the same direction in France they are told to not do that, you are supposed to have a complete control of your surrounding.
 
If I need to explicitly tell you that kneeling your full weight on a persons neck will likely have a negative impact on their livelihood then I don’t think a career ‘protecting & serving’ is for you.

The man was killed because the officers have prejudices that run deeply through American society.


You don’t train away racism.

I agree with this. The problem isn't the police it's the American culture. Racism, kids with guns, constant mass shootings.

They say the police represents the society it polices. Go figure.
 
Do you need to make a "Bobbies in Britain doing a bad job, again" thread?

It's tiresome. There's allegedly some smart people on the Caf so it is quite astonishing, and ironic, that when it comes to certain topics they become overly emotional and allow their bad experience, or something they have heard about, shape their entire opinion on something. Not only that they talk about it to others as fact.
 
@choiboyx012 weren't they supposed to put him in the back of their car? The other issue is that none of them is monitoring what is happening behind them, the four officers are oriented in the same direction in France they are told to not do that, you are supposed to have a complete control of your surrounding.
Yes. Once the cuffs are on, fight is over. Put him in the car as soon as possible.
 
There’s not a single thing right.

At the most basic level, it is, at absolute best criminally negligent.

There’s very little training that comes into this case in my opinion. It wasn’t a taught training technique exhibited badly, and I don’t think anyone could argue a trained police officer anywhere on earth wouldn’t know that applying crushing force on someone’s neck in that position is a monumentally poor idea. That leaves very little room other than to call it what it is - murder/manslaughter.

Admittedly I’ve only watched a short part of the video, I found it hugely upsetting, but what I saw, and what I have read and seen in other angles is someone who wanted to be seen by everyone else to have put that man down, a kind of I’m the big man, I’m in control to the absolute max and most horrible degree.

His specific intent as far as how much harm he thought he was causing and how race played into it is impossible for me to gauge.

However a police officer simply has to do a million times better than that. It’s a position of such responsibly and such wanton and mindless disregard for that poor man is beyond the pale.

I know you’re not supporting them at all and just answering questions honestly which I appreciate.

Without ,admittedly, any expertise in the American Policing situation, it just seems so patently apparent that there is a massive endemic, cultural issue with regards use of force and racism - both seperately and all too often in combination.

Do you find that disheartening? I’m sure there are a great many very competent, empathetic and good police officers in America but it does seem there’s a real reluctance to call it as it is and I wonder how much that cements the issues.
Absolutely right. Yes it is disheartening.
 
It's tiresome. There's allegedly some smart people on the Caf so it is quite astonishing, and ironic, that when it comes to certain topics they become overly emotional and allow their bad experience, or something they have heard about, shape their entire opinion on something. Not only that they talk about it to others as fact.
do you ever ask yourself, why are so many people having bad experiences with my colleagues? instead of instantly calling people stupid when they, for example, point out that your colleagues use stop and search powers on black people 40 times more than white people?
 
I agree with this. The problem isn't the police it's the American culture. Racism, kids with guns, constant mass shootings.

They say the police represents the society it polices. Go figure.

Umm, no. The problem is absolutely the police. American culture is also a problem. Two things can be true at once.
 
It's tiresome. There's allegedly some smart people on the Caf so it is quite astonishing, and ironic, that when it comes to certain topics they become overly emotional and allow their bad experience, or something they have heard about, shape their entire opinion on something. Not only that they talk about it to others as fact.

Also find it very insulting that you’re playing down an entire systemic problem, which is highlighted by all the disproportionate brutality against black people and other minorities that we have seen time and time again and unwillingness to take their colleagues and themselves into accountability etc., to ‘bad experiences’ and ‘something’ people have heard about

Edit: Just remembered you’re an officer yourself and I think I’ve even had back and fourths with you about this in another thread so actually I’m not gonna bother because none of you guys seem to see that you’re the issue.
 
It wouldn't really be the first time a rightwing regime went undercover to make the other side look bad. But yeah, evidence is needed.
 
Allegedly a lot of the fires have been started by undercover officers

edit:

There was another thread I saw explaining the same thing. Gonna have to do digging to find that one and will edit it in also.

Your going to need to prove that otherwise i think this should be deleted.

Cant be throwing around unfounded accusations like that
What proof is there?

Edit zero


Come on sara

 
I agree with this. The problem isn't the police it's the American culture. Racism, kids with guns, constant mass shootings.

They say the police represents the society it polices. Go figure.
are you taking the piss? you're going to come into this thread, which includes examples of children getting shot by police for holding toys in their hands and talk about kids with guns being a problem and not the police? how horrible, and it's not doing your smart cops theory any favours

even across oceans pigs will stand with eachother before they actually do what they're meant to
 
Also find it very insulting that you’re playing down an entire systemic problem, which is highlighted by all the disproportionate brutality against black people and other minorities that we have seen time and time again and unwillingness to take their colleagues and themselves into accountability etc., to ‘bad experiences’ and ‘something’ people have heard about

Edit: Just remembered you’re an officer yourself and I think I’ve even had back and fourths with you about this in another thread so actually I’m not gonna bother because none of you guys seem to see that you’re the issue.
Yea you tried to argue against a tazing at the petrol station by posting another situation saying the police should have tazed the guy in it.
 
do you ever ask yourself, why are so many people having bad experiences with my colleagues? instead of instantly calling people stupid when they, for example, point out that your colleagues use stop and search powers on black people 40 times more than white people?
Just wasting you're time.


It's all good and well using statistics but sometimes that's all they are.
 
It's tiresome. There's allegedly some smart people on the Caf so it is quite astonishing, and ironic, that when it comes to certain topics they become overly emotional and allow their bad experience, or something they have heard about, shape their entire opinion on something. Not only that they talk about it to others as fact.
Since when was ‘black [people are] disproportionately stopped & searched’ overly emotional instead of a fact.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Since when was ‘black [people are] disproportionately stopped & searched’ overly emotional instead of a fact.

Your post [as most of them are] is an idiot
he's a cop dude, he and his pals are in damage control every time they murder someone or abuse their powers, give it about 5 pages and he'll get bored and start going on about being a tough man who can easily arrest you because he's all big and tough and manly
 
Yea you tried to argue against a tazing at the petrol station by posting another situation saying the police should have tazed the guy in it.

Don’t twist my words I blatantly did not say he should have tased the other guy and you know damn well I didn’t. My point was it’s one rule for black people and another for white people.
 
Umm, no. The problem is absolutely the police. American culture is also a problem. Two things can be true at once.

But in this case it's not. The police isn't a monolith and it doesn't exist outside of the american society. The issue is clearly Society on topics like racism, legitimate use of force and some core institutions are organized based on political ideas that purposely make them less efficient. It's also worth remembering that even in the US the vast majority of police officers will never be an issue for the communities that they serve, they will do their job with professionalism and it will never make the news. The issue is with a minority that is logically representative of a part of american society, the only way to definitely get rid of these people is by changing society otherwise you are putting a band aid on a wooden leg.
 
Thanks for this, care to shed some light on why with such an influx of intelligence the force is still rife with racism? You know cause, being black will still disproportionately see people stopped & searched. . . & so on.

Sorry but I find a policeperson calling someone ‘arseholeish’ for making ‘sweeping generalisations’ laughable.

[& no I’ve not interacted with the majority of the force. Nor do I need to.]
I seldom get involved in these debates because they are rarely as clear cut as they appear. I think a lot of people have good intentions when they speak and protest against these sort of things but then can sometimes get too tangled up in blaming one thing or labelling everyone the same when that is a mistake.

We both know that the person I quoted was essentially saying most police officers in the UK are thick. To me that is being an arsehole and making a sweeping generalisation.
If you made that comment against any other group of people then I would have the same reaction.

Ill try and shed some light and give an honest opinion on things about the UK Met Police. I'm not talking about American police because they're too far gone, there is something seriously fecked up over there and there doesn't appear to be anything being done to sort it out.

But I'll start by addressing your stop and search concerns, and there's a disproportionately for sure. However, if you think that is purely down to 'racist coppers' you are gravely mistaken. Racism in the police compared to 30-40 years ago is not even comparable. I'm not basing this on speculation, this is from talking to black people (men in particular)who were alive in the 70's and 80's who went through some absolute shit and that includes black officers who were bullied. So actually yes there is an improvement because of the change in 'make up' of officers coming into the force.

Secondly, you saw that Amy Cooper video in central park right? and you're aware that a significant portion of stop and searches are based around information given to police by members of the public?

I think we both know people like Amy Coopers are not in the minority, so imagine those types of calls happening all the time on a daily basis with words like 'drugs' and 'knives' thrown in for desired effect. These members of public have now put police in a position where it is their duty to do something (search, most of the time in the UK, as we know officers in the US take a different approach) You cannot assume a caller is lying. It would not have been assumed Amy Cooper was lying.

Now the theory goes if someone has nothing to hide they'll be cool and calm but if they get angry and disruptive they do, I don't think this applies a lot of the time mind. If you're a black male ' doing nothing' but people like Amy Cooper are constantly calling police on you for nothing, there are gonna be occasions where you will rightfully be pissed off and agitated. If you think these factors aren't going to have a massive effect on the figures of stop and search you'd be very naive. A lot of response officers in London don't get the time to be proactive and most of their stops will originate from calls made by the public.

Sure, pose the question to police, but also pose the question to members of public, to society, pose the question to Amy Cooper's, why are you calling police on black people for no fecking reason? and why are you lying about what they've got or are doing? what is it that makes you so uncomfortable when you see a black person 'standing around' or 'sitting in a car' or 'having a bbq'. Why do you continually confuse Asian and North African people with black people? To be fair I don't expect you or other people to know this or be able to see this wider picture but it's why sometimes 'statistics' don't tell the whole story which leads me on to the ' Corona BAME fines disproportionate' figures.

People are up in arms about this but by just having a bit of knowledge about things, its easy to see that the percentage difference between whites to black and Asians is not overly concerning. To start with the majority of those fines would have been given out by Metropolitan LONDON police officers for obvious reasons. The ratio of black and asians to whites in London, dwarfs basically everywhere else in the UK. Yet those statistics were presented as a reflection of the whole of the uk. There are barely any police officers in the counties, where it is predominantly white, so there's nobody there basically to give fines to these predominantly white people breaking lockdown rules, yet they've been included in these statistics.
 
But in this case it's not. The police isn't a monolith and it doesn't exist outside of the american society. The issue is clearly Society on topics like racism, legitimate use of force and some core institutions are organized based on political ideas that purposely make them less efficient. It's also worth remembering that even in the US the vast majority of police officers will never be an issue for the communities that they serve, they will do their job with professionalism and it will never make the news. The issue is with a minority that is logically representative of a part of american society, the only way to definitely get rid of these people is by changing society otherwise you are putting a band aid on a wooden leg.

And it shouldn’t make the news because why should it when their job is what they’re supposed to be doing :wenger: and I am in agreement with what you said in its entirety, however, the police are supposed to be the most obvious example of upholders of the law, values, morals etc. before the community itself so before we look at society we need to look at the very people we are supposed to trust and who are supposed to set an example.