Deleted member 101472
Guest
Watched Mayweather on jimmy kimmell show, he told jimmy to bet on him, and if he loses Mayweather will give him that amount back. They even shook on it.
The greatest challenge he could have had in his career (short of moving up to 160 and fighting GGG) would have been to fight the Pacquiao that was steamrolling just about anyone in his sight. But even then, Floyd would have been favoured in that fight.A big thing for me is that we don't know how great he is when he's truly tested. Part of the reason we never found that out is because he's been dominant (not his fault) and also because he's been very picky about who he fights and when. There's a ton of opponents he either fought when it was longer the contest it would have been (Pacquaio still made money and was mainstream but was no longer a great Boxing match) and that was most defiantly his fault/choice.
The few times he was really tested gave me mixed results - Jose Luis Castillo I I felt he lost that fight (as do many), Maidana (who lets face it shouldn't be pushing him that close) being examples that I'd be hesitant picking him to come through when the going gets tough against skilled fellow greats. His hesitance to truly test himself vs. prime opponents and/or need for every possible advantage leads me to believe he doesn't have total confidence in himself. That's part of the reason I can't rank him in that top 20-30 all-time but I understand that's my policy and others are different. Still stands that next to no historians would rank him top 10-20.
From a technical standpoint I simply don't think he has the offense to really discourage warriors like Duran, Chavez, Hearns, Leonard. Whitaker is even better defensively than him and a southpaw (Floyd has always had a fear of southpaws dating back to his reluctance to face Casmayor and Stevie Johnston).
Leonard was faster on his feet and in addition to being a master boxer was great defensively and offensively. Just take a lot at Leonard in his prime. Look at the skill in the Benitez and Hearns fights. Two guys in their primes. Floyd was never tested on that level or near that level. Duran also a master boxer and brawler with amazing (underrated defense). Leonard was better at just about everything apart from defense (he was mostly an aggressive fighter) and by a distance. I also think Benitez of his prime years would perhaps beat Floyd. Hard to tell since Floyd never fought against a defensive specialist.The greatest challenge he could have had in his career (short of moving up to 160 and fighting GGG) would have been to fight the Pacquiao that was steamrolling just about anyone in his sight. But even then, Floyd would have been favoured in that fight.
Everyone always points to the first Castillo fight in particular and the first Maidana fight, as they were the two guys to actually win more than three rounds against Floyd. But never once did I believe that Floyd wasn't in complete control of those fights.
It is hard to judge because he's never been in a truly competitive fight, but my eyes tell me that it's more to do with Floyd being so skilled rather than his opponents not being of high enough quality. Looking at Floyd's resume, the four fights that were meant to be the toughest challenges of his career are Corrales and his fights at JMW. He destroyed Corrales, dominated Canelo. Oscar and Cotto had some good moments but ultimately, Floyd was comfortably ahead in both fights and pushed for the stoppage in both fight.
My eyes tell me that a boxer puncher like Leonard would be outboxed and Whitaker would not be able to overcome Floyd's overall skillset. Duran and Hearns would make for intriguing match-ups but again, I find it extremely hard to bet against Floyd.
Terence Crawford and Vasyl Lomachenko. Lomachenko is a once in generation athletic/technical talent. Both these guys are entertainers too who fight aggressively so much more pleasing on the eye.
Lomachenko.
You guys weren't kidding. Lomachenko is phenomenal
I like him when he speaks like that, not the trash talk fake persona which we see all too often. Strip on that away, and you've got a fighting animal. Still, he'll do well to win a round.
Terence Crawford and Vasyl Lomachenko. Lomachenko is a once in generation athletic/technical talent. Both these guys are entertainers too who fight aggressively so much more pleasing on the eye.
I've watched a bit of Lomachenko. He doesn't seem to possess any real power, however, he has angles on punches for days! What's his next significant fight?
McGregor inside 5.
5 seconds ?
38 pages about a non event, a freak show... a fight that's not real, a circus.... ''I ain't gonna watch that shit''
ffs
Doubt me now
He isn't a one punch kind of guy (Rocky Martinez may disagree) but he does possess some pop. I'd say he's more of a stinging puncher than a knockout puncher.I've watched a bit of Lomachenko. He doesn't seem to possess any real power, however, he has angles on punches for days! What's his next significant fight?
He isn't a one punch kind of guy (Rocky Martinez may disagree) but he does possess some pop. I'd say he's more of a stinging puncher than a knockout puncher.
He should be fighting Rigondeaux next. I think he will stop him inside 8 rounds or less.
Rigondeaux is too old and too small to hurt Lomachenko. The fight is at 130lbs, which almost makes it a non-contest.
Is it just me or has the hype not been anywhere near as much as it should be considering we're in the final week? Maybe I've just not noticed it, but there doesn't seem to be many people bigging it up now
Is there a final press conference this week? It should go viral and then the hype will peak.Is it just me or has the hype not been anywhere near as much as it should be considering we're in the final week? Maybe I've just not noticed it, but there doesn't seem to be many people bigging it up now
Is it just me or has the hype not been anywhere near as much as it should be considering we're in the final week? Maybe I've just not noticed it, but there doesn't seem to be many people bigging it up now
I was imagining the other day just what kind of ramifications it would have if McGregor knocked him senseless in the first 4 rounds and won. Would boxing pretty much die on it's arse? Millions of kids training to be boxers would take up MMA and aspire to be in the UFC. Everyone would look at boxers/MMA fighters completely differently, be a load of boxers calling out UFC names.
Such a weird risk for Mayweather to go for that he has to be very confident it's a walk in the park.
I think it was over exposed with the press tours and stuff. The hype and build up kind of peaked to soon. We heard everything we needed to at least 3 or 4 times in them and then for weeks after with the Paulie stuff etc. They kind of timed it all wrong I thought there was loads of hype a month or 2 ago...a ridiculous amount really (4 tours in 4 days!) now I don't think anyone needs any more.
I dunno, I see your point but at the same time if he were to win I'd imagine they market him as some kind of elite level boxer to be honest. They've given excuses and insurances already that Mayweather is older etc. If McGregor was to win I imagine if he was to carry on boxing he'd either get a title shot against someone or fight another big name. I don't think he'll win though.