Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
well no, their wage bill is 5th and they’ve finished 5th twice in their 3 full seasons.
So if we’re run like Nice, we’ll likely end up where our wage bill puts us.

Given Ligue 1 isn't comparable to the Premier League, by your comparison if we're run like Nice we would end up fighting for relegation given we would have a much lower wage bill than our direct competitors. Your comparison is also a bit strange because if we take it as it is and say we are run like PSG then we would win the League more often than not here!

Nice are currently 7th as well so not much improvement there.
 
Having just watched Kaveh Solhekol's latest analysis on Sky Sports News, it seems fairly certain that there's now three possible outcomes:
  • The Glazers sell the club in full to either Qatar or INEOS
  • The Glazers accept a part ownership/financing option from an American investment group
  • No transaction of any kind takes place

Decent position 959 pages in.

They either sell it totally, sell it partially, or don't sell it.

There literally aren't any other options!
 
And the point is that PSG first windows were successes unlike City's, their strategy worked, they improved the club massively.


The first three years brought, Matuidi, Ibrahimovic, Maxwell, Verratti, Thiago Silva, Thiago Motta, Marquinhos, Cavani among others. Unlike City, PSG actually had a successful strategy when QSI purchased the club and during the first years. Things went sideway later, around 2017, when they had to replace these players and someone else, Antero Henrique, was in charge.

The issue here is that you seem to not accept the idea that PSG isn't defined by a singular strategy, in reality the strategy that City followed post 2011 is closer to the strategy that PSG followed from day one. The issue for PSG is that they went away from it during summer 2017 when they spent 200m on Neymar instead of spreading their expenses on a mix of veteran and young players.

So would club use PSG as a model? The 2012-2016 version? absolutely because that's the strategy followed by most top clubs, that's how Real Madrid, prime Juventus, Bayern, United or AC Milan used to operate. While the post 2017 version is how the likes of Inter or Barcelona operates and that's stupid.
Good post

PSG have been run by the people heading the football department and with the arrival of Antero Henrique things started going off track. But like you say, the PSG from 2012-2016, is how you want a club to operate on the football side of the club. I also think if QSI were involved in the EPL they'd adapt to the challenge posed by City in the league. That challenge doesn't exist on the same level in Ligue 1 and PSG's focus has mainly been the champions league which is a cup competition.
 
I do wonder what the actual probability of the Glazers staying actually is. I think they know that now is the absolute best time to sell and they likely won't get a better offer in the future, but it's whether their ego's can deal with that.

Personally I think that United will be sold and likely to Qatar, but I suppose we'll see in the next few weeks. Would the other Glazer siblings accept being bought out for a lower stake than they'd get for a full sale? Or would they basically force Avrams hand and force him to sell? If they even could that is?
 
Decent position 959 pages in.

They either sell it totally, sell it partially, or don't sell it.

There literally aren't any other options!

Aliens could snatch the club and go back to Cepheus.
 
Operating like PSG do in the Premier League would result in a string of 5th and 6th place finishes with the odd 2nd place, miles and miles off the Champions.
Apart from you, who says United would be operated in the same way?

That wasn't the point, though, was it?

Why don't you, for the sake of balance, tell us how United will be run by looking at how INEOS have run Nice and Lausanne.
 
Good post

PSG have been run by the people heading the football department and with the arrival of Antero Henrique things started going off track. But like you say, the PSG from 2012-2016, is how you want a club to operate on the football side of the club. I also think if QSI were involved in the EPL they'd adapt to the challenge posed by City in the league. That challenge doesn't exist on the same level in Ligue 1 and PSG's focus has mainly been the champions league which is a cup competition.
Agree I think they sort of took Ligue 1 for granted knowing they'd probably walk it most years. What they should have done was buy the best players from their domestic competition just like how Bayern has done. They really haven't done enough of that.
 
I suppose if we operated like Nice, we'd end up in the relegation spots. This is all a foolhardy comparison in all honesty.

There are legitimate arguments for being against the Qatari or SJR bids, but what happened in the Ligue 1 isn't the main reason for me.

Given Ligue 1 isn't comparable to the Premier League, by your comparison if we're run like Nice we would end up fighting for relegation given we would have a much lower wage bill than our direct competitors.

You've obviously missed the part where I gave United league positions. We can make an educated guess about how PSG would fair because we have seen how clubs that just throw money without direction or planning fair in the PL.

PSG wouldn't have the luxury they have in France. Where they can half arse a title every season. The title in England almost always goes to the best run club that season, regardless of whether they are the biggest spenders or not. Chelsea are just about the only exception to this rule.
 
You've obviously missed the part where I gave United league positions. We can make an educated guess about how PSG would fair because we have seen how clubs that just throw money without direction or planning fair in the PL.

PSG wouldn't have the luxury they have in France. Where they can half arse a title every season. The title in England almost always goes to the best run club that season, regardless of whether they are the biggest spenders or not. Chelsea are just about the only exception to this rule.

I think as @JPRouve has shown that saying PSG didn't have any direction or planning is completely unfair and that's before we even come down on the fact that they would approach United in the same way.

I do agree that the comparison between Ligue 1 and PL does not have much stock in it but I am not the one trying to make the point about "United league positions" or whatever you meant based on what Qatar or INEOS do in Ligue 1.

What you do show is even if Qatar took over us and pumped billions into the club and didn't have a correct strategy, we won't win. That's true and that's why people shouldn't just assume United would walk the league at all like some think.
 
Given Ligue 1 isn't comparable to the Premier League, by your comparison if we're run like Nice we would end up fighting for relegation given we would have a much lower wage bill than our direct competitors. Your comparison is also a bit strange because if we take it as it is and say we are run like PSG then we would win the League more often than not here!

Nice are currently 7th as well so not much improvement there.

I don’t think you understand.

Nice have the 5th highest wage bill and finished 5th last season.
So Nice owners clearly perform to their relative wage. So at United, who currently have the highest wage bill…..

PSG on the other hand, they outspend their closest rivals by a quite staggering amount. So yeah, if they join United and spend 7 times more on wages then City, we would likely win the league more often not.
 
I don’t think you understand.

Nice have the 5th highest wage bill and finished 5th last season.
So Nice owners clearly perform to their relative wage. So at United, who currently have the highest wage bill…..

PSG on the other hand, they outspend their closest rivals by a quite staggering amount. So yeah, if they join United and spend 7 times more on wages then City, we would likely win the league more often not.

I do understand, you're trying to make a direct comparison between the leagues and I just disagree on it. You're assumption is if INEO comes in and they and have us become the highest wage bill in the PL they will have us finish first based one the performance of Nice last year. I don't think that makes much sense but fair cop if you believe it.
 
Already asked. @Regulus Arcturus Black thinks we would finish 5th at least.

No, I think the stats tell us we’d finish relative to our wage spend.

Nice spend 5th, finish 5th.

PSG far outspend 2nd to finish 1st, by at least 7 fold, but according to the Athletic, by 12 fold. There’s no question if our owners outspend our rivals by those amounts we’ll win the league.
Would be interesting though to see how those owners can operate in a league where they won’t even be able to outspend their rivals by double.
 
I don’t think you understand.

Nice have the 5th highest wage bill and finished 5th last season.
So Nice owners clearly perform to their relative wage. So at United, who currently have the highest wage bill…..

PSG on the other hand, they outspend their closest rivals by a quite staggering amount. So yeah, if they join United and spend 7 times more on wages then City, we would likely win the league more often not.
You mean the players
 
I do understand, you're trying to make a direct comparison between the leagues and I just disagree on it. You're assumption is if INEO comes in and they and have us become the highest wage bill in the PL they will have us finish first based one the performance of Nice last year. I don't think that makes much sense but fair cop if you believe it.

The point is more based on PSG, they finish first because they out spend their closest rivals wage bill by 12 fold.
What can’t be done is pretend PSG could do similar in the Premier League because they couldn’t, and that raises a tonne of questions about how good they could be if they spend at similar rates to their rivals.
We know Nice/INEOS spending at 5th rate, finish 5th.
 
No, I think the stats tell us we’d finish relative to our wage spend.

Nice spend 5th, finish 5th.

PSG far outspend 2nd to finish 1st, by at least 7 fold, but according to the Athletic, by 12 fold. There’s no question if our owners outspend our rivals by those amounts we’ll win the league.
Would be interesting though to see how those owners can operate in a league where they won’t even be able to outspend their rivals by double.

Do Nice have the 7th highest salary this year then?
 
The point is more based on PSG, they finish first because they out spend their closest rivals wage bill by 12 fold.
What can’t be done is pretend PSG could do similar in the Premier League because they couldn’t, and that raises a tonne of questions about how good they could be if they spend at similar rates to their rivals.
We know Nice/INEOS spending at 5th rate, finish 5th.

I guess the point is PSG invest in their team while Nice doesn't and is happy to coast along at 5th then (now 7th). Not sure I would want that at the club.
 
The point is more based on PSG, they finish first because they out spend their closest rivals wage bill by 12 fold.
What can’t be done is pretend PSG could do similar in the Premier League because they couldn’t, and that raises a tonne of questions about how good they could be if they spend at similar rates to their rivals.
We know Nice/INEOS spending at 5th rate, finish 5th.
Please stop presenting hypotheticals as facts.
 
I do understand, you're trying to make a direct comparison between the leagues and I just disagree on it. You're assumption is if INEO comes in and they and have us become the highest wage bill in the PL they will have us finish first based one the performance of Nice last year. I don't think that makes much sense but fair cop if you believe it.

And it's worth mentioning that Ineos is bringing Jean Claude Blanc, PSG's COO, the one actually doing the behind the scenes stuff.
 
I guess the point is PSG invest in their team while Nice doesn't and is happy to coast along at 5th then (now 7th). Not sure I would want that at the club.

Nice spend as they can spend, not cheating FFP, and end up at that level.
At United that would mean being the top spender.
Do you expect Nice to just cheat FFP?
PSG can enjoy investing all they like, but they can’t massively outspend their Premier League rivals.
 
Have they finished 7th?

Have Spurs finished 4th? Have Arsenal won the league?

Good chance they will be at those positions at the end of the season. Over 2/3rds of the season done. Surely if 5th = 5th, they would be comfortably 5th then.

Nice spend as they can spend, not cheating FFP, and end up at that level.
At United that would mean being the top spender.
Do you expect Nice to just cheat FFP?
PSG can enjoy investing all they like, but they can’t massively outspend their Premier League rivals.

I'd hope for some investment, maybe the 2nd or 3rd highest wage bill. I don't expect them to be as high as PSG.
 
I’m going on where they finished.

Good chance City will win the league still.

I had joked that INEOS would have us in the relegation spots if they invested in us comparatively as they did with Nice and the rest of Ligue 1. But I didn't realise they got Lausanne relegated

Again I am still sticking with the point that you can't gleam much from comparing the approaches to the other leagues.
 
I had joked that INEOS would have us in the relegation spots if they invested in us comparatively as they did with Nice and the rest of Ligue 1. But I didn't realise they got Lausanne relegated

Again I am still sticking with the point that you can't gleam much from comparing the approaches to the other leagues.
Twice
 
I had joked that INEOS would have us in the relegation spots if they invested in us comparatively as they did with Nice and the rest of Ligue 1. But I didn't realise they got Lausanne relegated

Again I am still sticking with the point that you can't gleam much from comparing the approaches to the other leagues.

Wage bill and finishing position is one of the most sure fire estimates of a teams finishing position. You know this. Matters not if it’s France or England or Spain.

oh the great Lausanne, who’ve spent 15 of the past twenty year in the second flight or lower and who bankrupted themselves twice in the 00’s.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.