red thru&thru
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2004
- Messages
- 7,657
If this actually is just a fishing expedition, the Glazers will obviously never actually confirm that and nor would anyone be able to prove it. They'll simply say that they were willing to sell and had a price in mind that was never met, so they'll take a minority investment to improve the club's finances somewhat in the short term and will try again for a sale 5 or so years down the road.
They have never at any stage said that the end goal of this process is selling the club. Raine will get a fat fee regardless and will be more than happy to act if the Glazers decide to bring the club to market again in future.
I believe this is one key trump card Jassim has over SJR.
And that is the key bit here, Raine will get paid. Big money. And there's no way that the Raine Group will get paid for "fishing".
Glazers will not be paying silly just to understand what interest there is in the club on the market. They're here to sell.
He takes this seriously and considering the background from the Qatari money it's a shame he won't get the deal. I've come to terms with it but Ratcliffe has shown real ambition here in my opinion.
I don't get why the Glazers would be interested in detailed plans and timelines about any buyers intentions for the stadium.
the club wasn't liable for the PIK loans no, the Glazers were and they paid them off
Same! And as a result I will view INEOS and any other Sir Jim Ratcliffe-affiliated companies/brands/conglomerates in a positive light from here on outHe takes this seriously and considering the background from the Qatari money it's a shame he won't get the deal. I've come to terms with it but Ratcliffe has shown real ambition here in my opinion.
Simply because SJR bid was originally without the debt and rumoured to be be £4.3-4.5bn for 69.5%, he then came out with multiple statements addressing the debt part which is in the accounts at £620m, he’s not going to simply add the debt to the original bid to make £4.9bn to £5.12bn, and Ineos would have done extensive due diligence on the second bid, expecting to be in the third and final round with Qatar where he could probably offer £5.5bn including the debt.Why would you assume that?
“Modernise” instead of “rebuild”?
One thing no one can accuse SJR of not being a very serious contender to buy United, he’s trying to take on a state and he should be put through to a final two horse round with Qatar.“Modernise” instead of “rebuild”?
Modernise is still my preferred scenario. Do a Bernabeu job on OT
“Modernise” instead of “rebuild”?
Everywhere seems to be torn, some want rebuild others want work done on the existing.
It would be sad to see OT go in my book.
That would still cost £1.25-1.5bn, the pitch is retracted into the ground and has huge under pitch opportunities, restaurants etc, then they can cater for modern arena events by changing the surface of the pitch with seats, basket ball court, Boxing, festivals and modular areas. Plus you have the roof to pay for which is retractable and closes in severe weather. Madrid are expecting another €150m added to their revenues because of this.Modernise is still my preferred scenario. Do a Bernabeu job on OT
I actually want to see a hybrid modelEverywhere seems to be torn, some want rebuild others want work done on the existing.
It would be sad to see OT go in my book.
Ed - ‘The Idiot Woodward’ owns 0.5% of the voting shares, if the glaziers do sell for £5.7bn, the idiot gets a cool £27.5 million, and you wonder why he just walked away !i would love it if they Put Ed The Idiot Woodward in charge
Old Trafford doesn’t need to be rebuilt, but it does need modernising. Any attention for the old place will be welcome.“Modernise” instead of “rebuild”?
We don't want them getting Ole. It has to be Gerrard so that it hurts the fans a hell of a lot more as it all falls apart.Then when Klopp fails to deliver they bring Ole as temporary manager
Along with some wording in his initial statement this’s another key word I don’t like when reading about his bid. It just screams increased debts and a restricted investment plan. Another red flag. Don’t like.“Modernise” instead of “rebuild”?
Let's not get into a long winded discussion on semantics here mate. Given the money they've bled out of the club before and especially in the decade after those loans were paid back. Ultimately those loans were paid back from club profits.
This deal will be 100% profit for the Glazers on top of the money they've already taken out of the club.
As let's not forget besides divedends the almost £500m they've made from selling class A shares in United. Likely not a penny of that has been invested back into the club.
I hope Sheikh Jassim out does that stadium. It’s about time we had the best stadium in the world.That would still cost £1.25-1.5bn, the pitch is retracted into the ground and has huge under pitch opportunities, restaurants etc, then they can cater for modern arena events by changing the surface of the pitch with seats, basket ball court, Boxing, festivals and modular areas. Plus you have the roof to pay for which is retractable and closes in severe weather. Madrid are expecting another €150m added to their revenues because of this.
At one point Madrid were even thinking about a shopping complex under the pitch
Along with some wording in his initial statement this’s another key word I don’t like when reading about his bid. It just screams increased debts and a restricted investment plan. Another red flag. Don’t like.
Don't know how people can make any conclusions from that "plans to modernise Old Trafford" bit. It can be anything from adding more screens in hospitality suites to a major £500m job. We know nothing about it.
“Modernise” instead of “rebuild”?
Ed - ‘The Idiot Woodward’ owns 0.5% of the voting shares, if the glaziers do sell for £5.7bn, the idiot gets a cool £27.5 million, and you wonder why he just walked away !
its not semantics it’s just a fact