Being handed your coat is never cool on this side…Yes! 'Cause it's cool
Must be a cultural thingBeing handed your coat is never cool on this side…
Whether it’s SJR or SJHAT, SAF and ETH must be happy that AG, JG and GF are gone unless GF and RG sold it to TZ or EIM. That would mean no FDJ or HK or VO but EMCM, JWP, KWP.But would SAF and EtH still be BFFs if SJR was SJ's HBK?
Because he is a man of integrity and that's where the desert is.Why would you build it in the Sahara?
i think most likely they’ll be bidding for the glazers not named Joel & Avram shares, but will be done in a way where Avran and Joel remain majority. I don’t know tbh it’s a deal that doesn’t make sense.This is hard to imagine. Selling a minority stake to Elliot in order to invest in the club is counter to the last 18 years. That would be the same as the Glazers putting their own money into the club. Either Elliot gives them a loan, which the Glazera put into the club, or Elliot gets a stake, which reduces the Glazers' stake.
The Glazers have 69% and want 6 billion, meaning they are valuing the club at about 8.7bn total.
They're only being offered 5bn for their 69%.
Let's say they take 1bn from Elliot for 19%, keeping 50% for themselves.
In order for the Glazers to get 6bn by owning 50% of the shares, the club would need to be valued at 12 billion.
That's a 38% increase in value that they would need to achieve in order to get 6bn from a future sale.
You know that moment right before your head explodes? That's what just happeWhether it’s SJR or SJHAT, SAF and ETH must be happy that AG, JG and GF are gone unless GF and RG sold it to TZ or EIM.
I get your point. It’s true. I think it does depend on how “cool” the abbreviation sounds. Most Dutch ones are pretty cool sounding and for Brits it’s usually reserved for the knighted. With Jassim no one wants to butcher the name
It's definitely more than 3. And SJH would be more appropriate.
But if we want to get pedantic then most people have 3-4 names if you include their middle names.
The point of my tongue in cheek post was that Sheikh Jassim is being shortened to SJ for no apparent reason.
No ones ever called Sir Alex, SA or Erik Ten ET for example.
Before knighthood SAF would be plain AF
It's definitely more than 3. And SJH would be more appropriate.
But if we want to get pedantic then most people have 3-4 names if you include their middle names.
The point of my tongue in cheek post was that Sheikh Jassim is being shortened to SJ for no apparent reason.
No ones ever called Sir Alex, SA or Erik Ten ET for example.
worst season of The Bachelor ever.
cleverBefore knighthood SAF would be plain AF
Eight hags? Is it too late?
I get your point. It’s true. I think it does depend on how “cool” the abbreviation sounds. Most Dutch ones are pretty cool sounding and for Brits it’s usually reserved for the knighted. With Jassim no one wants to butcher the name
Before knighthood SAF would be plain AF
You have a high opinion of the caf.I get your point. It’s true. I think it does depend on how “cool” the abbreviation sounds. Most Dutch ones are pretty cool sounding and for Brits it’s usually reserved for the knighted. With Jassim no one wants to butcher the name
Save on the heating bills? Extortionate right nowWhy would you build it in the Sahara?
Never been to Sidcup but if I had a harem I'd build it a bit closer than a 1000 miles from where I liveBecause he is a man of integrity and that's where the desert is.
Ever seen a harem in Sidcup?
You just don't have the billionaire mindset.Never been to Sidcup but if I had a harem I'd build it a bit closer than a 1000 miles from where I live
The bloke lives in a desert country that supplies you with the stuff you use for heating!Save on the heating bills? Extortionate right now
It’s AGOFTWhether it’s SJR or SJHAT, SAF and ETH must be happy that AG, JG and GF are gone unless GF and RG sold it to TZ or EIM. That would mean no FDJ or HK or VO but EMCM, JWP, KWP.
Joel and Avram wouldn’t be able to set foot in their family again. The rest want to sell and get paiiiiiiiidIf true, they can never step foot in Manchester again. I don't know much but that would be a bad idea.
5.5 - 6b and it's game over.
Avi can take his shit hair and feck off.
Avram is said to be the only family member who actually likes watching football and is invested in United's success. The rest of them are only in it for the money.it’s surprising Avram’s the one hellbent on keeping Utd, I always thought it was Joel who was more interested in remaining in charge. We really need the rest of them to make that creature see sense and cash in now.
This is misguided.I've been aboard the Qatar train this entire time but that Finnish guy being an ex player and ex chairman could be promising. Having actual football people at the top of the chain is a good thing. Feck a minority stake though. We need the Glazers gone.
This is misguided.
All of our ex players who are 'football people' championed the appointment of Ole which set us back years. Neville, Ferdinand, Scholes, Keane etc.
Give me non ex players who have achieved proven results at other clubs over 'football people' all day long.
He’s just using it for publicity.I've been aboard the Qatar train this entire time but that Finnish guy being an ex player and ex chairman could be promising. Having actual football people at the top of the chain is a good thing. Feck a minority stake though. We need the Glazers gone.
The other four Glazer siblings, Bryan, Kevin, Edward and Darcie are rumoured to be in favour of selling Manchester United at a big profit, but not necessarily for as much as £6bn.