He is right though. Modernisation can mean anything from a Bernabue style of Modernisation to a lick of paint and a couple of big screens. That us why SJR should explain what he has in mind
Club Sale | It’s done!
- Thread starter JB08
- Start date
- Status
He is right though. Modernisation can mean anything from a Bernabue style of Modernisation to a lick of paint and a couple of big screens. That us why SJR should explain what he has in mind
I thought we already got that with our vaccines
no, that’s a different thing but never mind
Goldman Sachs
He has an NDA, is he even allowed to discuss it?
And he’s not “right”, right in this instance would be:
“let’s see if we get to a stage where we see those plans, or if the Qatari offer is too strong for the Glazers to turn down”.
The poster is instead already painting it in a negative light, when it could be a huge positive, the point is, we don’t know, just as we have no idea how the Qatari bid is being funded.
Some however completely ignore the funding of the Qatari bid, painting it all as positive despite the huge unknowns about the bidders, yet do the opposite with INEOS. It’s a clear bias.
Semantics.
Goldman Sachs, If Saddam had a bank and Goldman Sachs is just next door, I would rather use Saddam's Bank.How dare they use a bank
The Qatari are using cash you know.
Feel for whoever will have to count £6b cash.How dare they use a bank
The Qatari are using cash you know.
Ah, this one where GS are worse than the Qatari leadership, I enjoy these odd chats.
We’re talking up to 6bn here, it’s all “dirty” capitalism in some way. There’s no clean money here man.
You want even more debt loaded on to the club? It will be indirectly and with current interest rates too?How dare they use a bank
The Qatari are using cash you know.
Oh, Gates must be late on delivering to my city.
I very much doubt it would be, it’d be on the 10 times larger INEOS group.
And once again, we have no clue so far as to how the Qatari bid is funded.
I know there is no clean money here. But come on man. Goldman Sachs
.I know there is no clean money here. But come on man. Goldman Sachs
Qatari state
It’s all very silly aint it?
In Jassim we trust. It's well known all the money will be coming solely from his own savings pot.
Not being sarcastic, but genuine question. Would it really? Sure they sell a hell of a lot more merchandise there but it’s then split with every team that isn’t the Cowboys
The loan will be on the club. No ifs and buts.
Isnt this how most clubs would be purchased? And the debt not put onto the club. We were just very very unlucky to have the tapeworms who currently own us.
In fact isn't it now not possible to do what the Glazers did? I might have made that up though.
So would I, but only because I'd be wondering how a dead man owned a bank.
How? All 6 siblings will give up their shares for the value of £2bn?
Buying a club, no.
Building a new stadium. Yes.
Ineos rebuilding the stadium will be with a loan, nothing funny about that. The loan will most probably be on the club.
As if they are going to count £6B by hand lads
You have absolutely no idea about that, like zero.
So no “if or buts” is laughable.
For what it’s worth, I’d personally be fine with the club paying for it’s own renovation or new stadium, just as 99.999999% of the World’s other clubs have to, but that said, financing would be much easier through INEOS due to 2bn annual profits, in comparison to losses or at best 100m profit.
.You've drunk the greenwashing kool-aid
It will be just like any other club in the world, how is that strange? Real, Munich, Spurs, Arsenal all did it and I am not at all against it. The club should build its stadium with its own money. But if the possibility of building it from the owners money will come up, I will not say no.
Read my post above.
Doesn’t matter what your above post says, Arsenal and Spurs for example were not owned by a parent company 10 times their size.
Financing would be much easier through the parent company, that’s just a fact.
But neither or us know the plan, so let’s stop with the absolutes and the “no if or buts”.
They are pundits and ex-teammates of him, not employees. Ajax did pretty well for themselves with Overmars, VDS etc. I still want Qatar, but if I had to choose between that guy and Jim I might've leaned towards the Fins if it was a full takeover and not a minority stake. What are SJR's proven results at Nice?
Which had what to do with my post berbs?
uhhh you said the Glazers didn’t put their own money in. This is false.
then you said something about the PIK loans which was also false
it’s not semantics, you’re just wrong and can’t let it go
The reality is that nobody will lend the club money to build a new stadium unless it's at some exorbitant rate. We have borrowed so much already. And based on our current projections, our topline revenues aren't expected to the degree that we can support an additional £ 2 billion loan.
At best we can 'modernise' by using a palette of warm taupes, browns and caramel tones on the interior walls of OT. Upgrade the wifi and some LED lighting.
- Status