Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whether fair and deserved or not, the stain of what city's owners have done will spill over onto us all too easily if we also take the oil money.

Is it really worth a couple of decades of sportswashing money? For what? We won't be able to blow away the saudis or city anyway.

Manchester United should be better than this. We are the biggest club in the land for many reasons. Some of it has come from success, of course. There is though, an undeniable romance surrounding the club. Everyone knows it's a special club. But that status is not guaranteed to last. Far from it. We have to maintain the highest standards off the pitch. It's a big part of the ethos of this club.

I could write so much more on this subject. But I have restrained myself a lot because I know this is a very international forum and all views should be expected and expressed. I do hope though, that maybe a few who have no qualms over this potential Qatari takeover, take this post seriously and consider the impact on the club for the rest of it's existence.

I was vehemently against the glazer takeover. Many of us were. But unfortunately not enough to prevent it from happening. We have few options to influence who takes over right now, but welcoming them with open arms? I find that deeply disturbing.
 
Premier League ownership rules are strict - you are limited to a 10% share in any second club. Unless PIF were minority partners in the Ineos bid (which, to be fair, is possible), the Saudis would probably need to use one of their other investment vehicles in any joint bid for United.

Yeah, this is why I can't see Saudi being part of it.

Only way it would be, it would be the long route of, Saudis giving SJR 10%. Then begin to sell off Newcastle and then eventually buy the rest of the club from SJR at a premium.

But as I say, that would be a very long route.
 
If this is true and hypothetically the Sheikh puts in a bid that blows everyone else away, what would be the point in a further bidding round?

there's a chance that SJR will bring Elliott to Manchester thus boosting his bid with these vultures money.
 
Whether fair and deserved or not, the stain of what city's owners have done will spill over onto us all too easily if we also take the oil money.

Is it really worth a couple of decades of sportswashing money? For what? We won't be able to blow away the saudis or city anyway.

Manchester United should be better than this. We are the biggest club in the land for many reasons. Some of it has come from success, of course. There is though, an undeniable romance surrounding the club. Everyone knows it's a special club. But that status is not guaranteed to last. Far from it. We have to maintain the highest standards off the pitch. It's a big part of the ethos of this club.

I could write so much more on this subject. But I have restrained myself a lot because I know this is a very international forum and all views should be expected and expressed. I do hope though, that maybe a few who have no qualms over this potential Qatari takeover, take this post seriously and consider the impact on the club for the rest of it's existence.

I was vehemently against the glazer takeover. Many of us were. But unfortunately not enough to prevent it from happening. We have few options to influence who takes over right now, but welcoming them with open arms? I find that deeply disturbing.

Id argue that we haven’t maintained shit for standards off the pitch though, and if we continue to decline on the pitch as well we’ll be nothing more than a nice story in the history books like other past clubs that have come and gone.

We’ve let our facilities become brutally outdated, our owners have done nothing but pay themselves out of the clubs pockets like the greedy cnuts they are, we’ve shown hilarious mismanagement in the board room with a number of decisions.

You can be as romantic as you want, but at a certain point shit has to change or the supporters that loved the club for what it WAS will eventually die and you won’t have anyone to take their place as irrelevance sets in slowly but surely.
 
The Glazers are not turning £5.5bn down surely are they? that is a colossal offer but would not surprise me if Qatar go even higher to make sure they get the prize.
 
So after tomorrows deadline, should we have a clearer picture or another month delay with further bids/thinning from Glazers part? Could we find out within the next few days who the new owner(hopefully a new owner) will be?
 
So after tomorrows deadline, should we have a clearer picture or another month delay with further bids/thinning from Glazers part? Could we find out within the next few days who the new owner(hopefully a new owner) will be?

According to the Ben Jacobs fella, Raine will assess the bids next. Then if the glazers are titillated they will offer one party exclusivity on making a final deal.
 
According to the Ben Jacobs fella, Raine will assess the bids. Then if the glazers are titillated they will offer one party exclusivity on making a final deal.

I wonder how long that would take, I hope there are solid plans for the summer window regardless of who the owners are, but obviously it could swing drastically from glazers vs Jassim (I’m assuming he’d spend).
 
I wonder how long that would take, I hope there are solid plans for the summer window regardless of who the owners are, but obviously it could swing drastically from glazers vs Jassim (I’m assuming he’d spend).

End of April?

I would image murtough has done some scenario planning for his transfer targets regardless.
 
The feck is a disco mirror
It's what you buy when you want to jass up the place.
2c5900b128dbf570c014745a4c37362a_1362x1024.jpg
 
The more information that coming out from Jim Ratcliffe/Ineos bid the worse it gets.

Eventually partnering with US Hedge Funds/Investors is as bad as keeping the Glazers as owners. A co ownership with a ME investor is equally as bad. Everything else than a new owner with a 100% ownership and a totally debts free club is a recipe for disaster. Red flags all over the place.
 
The whole narrative about the SJR bid is he isn’t in it for profit. If he’s partnering with Elliot, they are certainly in it for profit. That’s a terrible prospect.

Let's be honest no one willing to pay £5b for a football club isn't in it for profit on some level, at the very least in the long term. Nobody wakes up one day and suddenly feels the urge to pump billions into a football club through altruistic reasons.
 
The more information that coming out from Jim Ratcliffe/Ineos bid the worse it gets.

Eventually partnering with US Hedge Funds/Investors is as bad as keeping the Glazers as owners. A co ownership with a ME investor is equally as bad. Everything else than a new owner with a 100% ownership and a totally debts free club is a recipe for disaster. Red flags all over the place.
Jassim can't afford it so will be in debt to someone.
 
The more information that coming out from Jim Ratcliffe/Ineos bid the worse it gets.

Eventually partnering with US Hedge Funds/Investors is as bad as keeping the Glazers as owners. A co ownership with a ME investor is equally as bad. Everything else than a new owner with a 100% ownership and a totally debts free club is a recipe for disaster. Red flags all over the place.

I can't see what hedge funds would give SJR, that JP Morgan or Goldman Sachs couldn't. Hedge funds being involved is a none entity.
 
If you don't see the difference between Manchester City, a club supported by a small portion of residents of Stockport who were a nothing-club before their takeover, to the behemoth which is an already established great of the game in Manchester United, then I don't know what to say.

Think of Spurs being bought by Qatar and then all of a sudden start winning the league nearly every season. It's similar and even then, Spurs are stil a bigger and well known club than City were when they were aquired by their new overlords.

Man Utd, Bayern, Barca, Real Madrid and Liverpool are on a different planet to other football clubs in regards to stature and a worldwide following. It's just how it is.

Exactly - on another planet and can sustainably succeed without having to sell their soul to Arabian dictatorships.

Woodward is the reason United have floundered in the past decade, not lacking a sugar daddy. Now there’s a proper coach in charge, new people making football decisions the club on moving in the right direction again.

SJR taking over would likely mean the club pays for its own stadium renovation - why shouldn’t it? All he’s required to do is allow it to spend its own money.

This weird fanboy obsession with becoming a Qatari proxy club is at odds with what set United apart in the first place; like City’s owners, they want to do a massive land grab in Greater Manchester at scandalously discounted rates, under the false guise of improving the area.

Have some self-respect.
 
The more information that coming out from Jim Ratcliffe/Ineos bid the worse it gets.

Eventually partnering with US Hedge Funds/Investors is as bad as keeping the Glazers as owners. A co ownership with a ME investor is equally as bad. Everything else than a new owner with a 100% ownership and a totally debts free club is a recipe for disaster. Red flags all over the place.

It's quite likely that both would end up owning 100% of shares and both would likely remove the debt.

But hypothetically what difference would it make if Ineos or Qatar for that matter only owned 69% of the club? Considering that that 69% has 100% control?
 
Jassim can't afford it so will be in debt to someone.

indeed - he’s the figurehead used by the Qatari barbarians to pretend they’re not the true owners, as the ultimately disinterested Sheikh Masour is at City.
 
Taken from the tweet thread, not sure how this equals blowing anyone out of the water.
The headline is slightly misleading but as has been previously reported, the Jassim bid wants to go slightly above the best rival offer to win and not get involved in ghost bidding against themselves.
 
Exactly - on another planet and can sustainably succeed without having to sell their soul to Arabian dictatorships.

Woodward is the reason United have floundered in the past decade, not lacking a sugar daddy. Now there’s a proper coach in charge, new people making football decisions the club on moving in the right direction again.

SJR taking over would likely mean the club pays for its own stadium renovation - why shouldn’t it? All he’s required to do is allow it to spend its own money.

This weird fanboy obsession with becoming a Qatari proxy club is at odds with what set United apart in the first place; like City’s owners, they want to do a massive land grab in Greater Manchester at scandalously discounted rates, under the false guise of improving the area.

Have some self-respect.

This 100%.

We are one world class striker away to be competing with any top team in the world.

We don't need the blood/oil money of some murderous regime, just competent people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.