ShinjiNinja26
Full Member
https://www.hetflix.com/2023/03/21/...-talks/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
I have not seen this quote anywhere...
Yeah, his ‘sporting expertise’ have really done wonders for Nice and Lausanne…
https://www.hetflix.com/2023/03/21/...-talks/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
I have not seen this quote anywhere...
Yeah, his ‘sporting expertise’ have really done wonders for Nice and Lausanne…
If true then Ratcliffe's business model is clearly a multi-club model -- and may limit what he think is worthwhile.
I think Jassim's business case is vastly different which may value the potential of the deal very differently.
I don’t understand these “good impressions” and “not yet warming to Jassim” tweets.Wonder if Ratcliff coming in person helped with his "good impressions"
It wouldnt, drop the exaggerations.Wouldn't surprise me at all if Ratcliffe makes a deal with the likes of Elliot or Ares to get him over the line. It would mean the final destruction of the club.
Imagine (I dread to) if one of the other “5 bidders” is the winner and turns out a worse prospect than the public bidders. Could end up a day of mourning rather than celebration. Dare I say it, we may wish the Glazers back.Just imagine if SJR partnered alongside an ME state? Would be interesting to read the views of from some on here!
Wouldn't surprise me at all if Ratcliffe makes a deal with the likes of Elliot or Ares to get him over the line. It would mean the final destruction of the club.
It’d be the same.Just imagine if SJR partnered alongside an ME state? Would be interesting to read the views of from some on here!
It'd be the same?It’d be the same.
Yeah, it's as if the Glazers are giving their daughter up for marriage in some medieval timeline instead of looking to squeeze the last bits of juice out of United after 20 years of leeching.I don’t understand these “good impressions” and “not yet warming to Jassim” tweets.
INEOS with Joel and Avram as minority partners watching the value of the club and their stake rise as SJR pays for the infrastructure seems more likely. I can’t see him outbidding Qatar so structure of the bid might be his only option.Just imagine if SJR partnered alongside an ME state? Would be interesting to read the views from some on here!
Pretty shameless by Ratcliffe, if true. I think whoever ends up buying the club should keep Fletcher and Murtough in place for now but on a shorter leash to see how things progress over the next few years with recruitment. The club doesn’t need further turmoil and a PSG like scatter gun approach.
Maybe. I just don't see the obvious gain in terms of helping close the deal. Why create potential conflicts by going to the Press?
It’s weird. Speaking of which…PR isn't magic, it's an uphill battle when a lot of people here want Qatar. Notice that Al-Thani and Ratcliffe said basically the same thing about not wanting to pay stupid amounts, yet received the opposite reaction on here. From the very same users, in some instances. It's pretty fascinating.
You literally created an imaginary distinction two separate the same scenario. Not sure why all this mental gymnastics is neededThere is a difference between Ratcliffe saying it directly to the journos and Jassim's PR company leaking things into the press.
Deniablity.
Also, I don't see Ratcliffe's purpose in doing this interview right after the very high-profile meeting last week. If anything Ratcliffe and his team should be busy getting down to crunching out numbers to make the deal work.
Besides the hi-vis meeting, it is odd that he brought his two other partners into the meeting last week -- it seems like he has to convenience them of the potential of the project.
At this stage of the process, when you need to give a first official firm bid, you need the domain knowledge folks (financial and legal) involved who can do the due diligence and analyse to eventually come out with a bid. Not the C-suite folks who aren't the number crunchers.
Thus the cynicism.
It'd be the same.It'd be the same?
It’s weird. Speaking of which…
You literally created an imaginary distinction two separate the same scenario. Not sure why all this mental gymnastics is needed
This does not surprise me, you can be very flexible as a bidder in this process and that is the advantage SJR has over Qatar.
For Qatar, everything indicates that they will make a massive investment in at least the area around Old Trafford. That will require 'merging' assets of the club -- i.e. land -- with asset of the owner -- i.e. money -- and turning into infrastructure, real estate assets etc. This is cumbersome to do if the club have minority owners.
If SJR wants to control the club, all it takes is 50.1% of the shares (or down towards 40-45% if shares remain listed, since a bunch of shareholders won't show up at a general meeting and vote).
Will it mean that the Glazers remain? That would surprise me a great great deal. Its just hard to see what value a minority share has in MUFC.
This sale, no matter who it is, will break the Denver world record fee. But I wonder how long it'll take to break again.
I don't know of any major American teams are up for sale right now, other than the Washington Commanders, and their sale is going to be sorted soon. They're in the same boat as United. A completely inept owner who has made a mockery of the team and has let them slide down the NFL rankings since he bought them in 99, throwing around insane money for players and having horrible conduct in and out of the press. (Also currently going through a new stadium fiasco - could be United's imminent future)
Would Liverpool sell for more? I'd say there's a chance.
I would suspect he’s not the only one. How many of the people giddy about Qatar ownership were slating City for their success being bought and not mattering? The hypocrisy is crazy.I’d take anything Alex says with a pinch of salt if I were you. Let’s not forget he’s the same poster that just a few months ago was claiming he hated state ownership and absolutely everything it stands for.
See @Messier1994 ’s post above. Was wondering the same thing.Why this Jassim wants 100% of the club line keeps being repeated is a bit odd. Once either party buys the club they can buy the rest of the shares whenever they can/want.
Yeah, his ‘sporting expertise’ have really done wonders for Nice and Lausanne…
It'd be the same.
See @Messier1994 ’s post above. Was wondering the same thing.
I think it's getting repeated possibly due to Jassim wanting to privatize the club?Why this Jassim wants 100% of the club line keeps being repeated is a bit odd. Once either party buys the club they can buy the rest of the shares whenever they can/want.
Leak vs interview? Sending the C-suite vs representatives? There are very few if any, and they aren’t relevant.Well. clearly you don't recognise the nuances.
I would suspect he’s not the only one. How many of the people giddy about Qatar ownership were slating City for their success being bought and not mattering? The hypocrisy is crazy.
This does not surprise me, you can be very flexible as a bidder in this process and that is the advantage SJR has over Qatar.
For Qatar, everything indicates that they will make a massive investment in at least the area around Old Trafford. That will require 'merging' assets of the club -- i.e. land -- with asset of the owner -- i.e. money -- and turning into infrastructure, real estate assets etc. This is cumbersome to do if the club have minority owners.
If SJR wants to control the club, all it takes is 50.1% of the shares (or down towards 40-45% if shares remain listed, since a bunch of shareholders won't show up at a general meeting and vote).
Will it mean that the Glazers remain? That would surprise me a great great deal. Its just hard to see what value a minority share has in MUFC.
Yeah he makes a fair point that could be a reason why they keep emphasising that Jassim wants 100%. Which would mean that what they are really saying is he wants 100% control of the club. If not 100% of the shares, right away anyway.