Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jim's won't be fixing it, thankfully. He seems a bit of a chancer to me.

I want someone to wipe out the debt and let us spend our own money without dodgy loans and alternative funding sources that we find out about a year down the line.

Feck Jim, really gone off him.
Lets not make major decisions on a whim based on what they seem. No one has ever seen Jassim in person, everything we've heard so far has been fed line by line to the Daily Mail.
 
This 100%.

We are one world class striker away to be competing with any top team in the world.

We don't need the blood/oil money of some murderous regime, just competent people.

Agreed, except the money has run out and covid has made a huge negative impact on our revenues/finances. Our commercial income has stagnated/reduced.

We're also saddled with a shiteload of debt that is now going to be increasingly difficult to service. Finding someone dumb enough to "wipe it out" is extremely rare. So far we've only found one that will do so.

We're not going to be able to spend anywhere near the same amount as last summer. In fact, the glazers have allowed such a large spend last summer in one last hurrah as they shrewdly realise a players fair value on the balance sheet can be manipulated to be worth far more than any cash in bank.
 
Have any of you actually visited the area around eastlands and seen the change or asked the people what they think before you claim lack of self respect.

hang on, should Mancs be thankful their council sold off a shit tonne of land at a dog shit price in a massive Middle Eastern land grab? :lol:

Kin ell I’ve heard it all now.
 
It's quite likely that both would end up owning 100% of shares and both would likely remove the debt.

But hypothetically what difference would it make if Ineos or Qatar for that matter only owned 69% of the club? Considering that that 69% has 100% control?
Big difference. They will not invest in infrastructure, build a new stadium, new training ground with their own money while the other 31% take a free ride.
 
Lets not make major decisions on a whim based on what they seem. No one has ever seen Jassim in person, everything we've heard so far has been fed line by line to the Daily Mail.
We're not making the decision though, thankfully.

I just want Utd to be able to spend their own money again without a bunch of people in Florida taking millions out of it every year.
 
It costs less than 20m a year to service, so stop making things up to suit your narrative.

Imagine thinking 20m a year wasn't a high figure.

Imagine thinking this figure won't continue to rise as we aren't servicing the debt and interest rates are rising at astronomical rates which will be reflected in this financial year.

Not the brightest bulb are you?

:rolleyes:
 
Unless of course it’s the banker partnering with an investment group, or his Dad, or the Qatari state, or a mixture of all of the above.
Then you want a partnership right?
I have no problem if Jim takes a loan from a bank and put it on his company. But partnering with an investment fund is where we should draw the line.
 
Imagine thinking 20m a year wasn't a high figure.

Imagine thinking this figure won't continue to rise as we aren't servicing the debt and interest rates are rising at astronomical rates this financial year.

:rolleyes:

Imagine thinking all loans are on non-fixed term rates.

And 20m is next to nothing for a company with revenues in the 600m region.
 
Imagine thinking all loans are on non-fixed term rates.

And 20m is next to nothing for a company with revenues in the 600m region.

Imagine thinking our loans were fixed term rates :lol:

You're borrowing from a fecking investment bank not your local regional bank mortgage :lol:

In case you haven't looked at our financials, we're making losses. 600m revenue but what are our costs? Profit margins?
 
It costs less than 20m a year to service, so stop making things up to suit your narrative.
This is based on 2020 rates and I don't know how long the maturity on that is. It's also US-dollar denominated which means the pound cratering doesn't help.

Care to tell us the debt maturity profile or are you just spitting flames at posters who do not agree with your uniformed opinions?
 
This is based on 2020 rates and I don't know how long the maturity on that is. It's also US-dollar denominated which means the pound cratering doesn't help.

Care to tell us the debt maturity profile or are you just spitting flames at posters who do not agree with your uniformed opinions?

Care to tell us before claiming it’s becoming increasingly difficult to service.
 
I think people are slating the infinite spending part, rather than being state backed.

There’s quite a few clubs linked to states aren’t there? City are the standouts due to the spend
This goes back to a question I keep asking. If a huge investment isn't expected (call it infinite spend or whatever you like) why even back the Qatari bid?

Can you explain why point 1 doesn’t matter?
So state-ownership is fine as long as it's a big club? That's quite an odd line to draw.

Once again having a Qatar owner does not correlate to cheating buying success.

City purposely cheated they could of done it all above board with the same owners just there plan would of taken twice the amount of time.

They obviously decided the punishment or the chance of being caught was worth it.

City will say there arm was forced as to get to the revenue streams to allow you to spend the money and get the top players is a long process.

United do not have to do any of this and can still be top of class.This is a huge difference that all the anti Qatar people on this thread just gloss over.
City's success was slated before the accusations of cheating ever came out.

For the record, I'm not anti-Qatar or pro-INEOS. Either could suck as owners or be amazing. You also won't see me making any moral arguments against either party. What I'm trying to understand is the hypocrisy and mental gymnastics behind wanting Qatar ownership and the constant bashing of INEOS.
 
This is based on 2020 rates and I don't know how long the maturity on that is. It's also US-dollar denominated which means the pound cratering doesn't help.

Care to tell us the debt maturity profile or are you just spitting flames at posters who do not agree with your uniformed opinions?

The glazers have been kicking the can down the road in regards to capital repayments on our debt. Nobody knows when that will be coming due either. It could be soon hence why they are selling the club. Trying to refinance that in this day and age will cost the club significantly higher interest payments.

Don't forget the overdraft facility that those scum owners took out during covid.

We're likely paying upwards of 6%-8% on that if even. None of which has been serviced since Covid. At least that we know of.
 
Big difference. They will not invest in infrastructure, build a new stadium, new training ground with their own money while the other 31% take a free ride.

Well maybe but the Glazers shares gives them 100% control either way and there is probably a process in place that any new owner has to buy all the other shares anyway.

But even if there isnt I don't realistically see either party spending £5-6b on United and then not looking to get ownership of the other 31% at some point. There would be no massive rush as any new infrastructure would still take a few years to get started.
 
Imagine thinking our loans were fixed term rates :lol:

You're borrowing from a fecking investment bank not your local regional bank mortgage :lol:

Oh wow, you don’t know the original 500m bond issue was in order to receive a much better fixed rate on the interest whilst paying off the horrendous PIK loans?

And you’re the one laughing :lol:



Partnership?
 
hang on, should Mancs be thankful their council sold off a shit tonne of land at a dog shit price in a massive Middle Eastern land grab? :lol:

Kin ell I’ve heard it all now.

Should really talk to the people on the ground there and in the communities as they ain’t got a chance of their own government investing.

Yes that doesn’t make the political situation in said countries any better but your telling a story strictly from one side.
 
Should really talk to the people on the ground there and in the communities as they ain’t got a chance of their own government investing.

Yes that doesn’t make the political situation in said countries any better but your telling a story strictly from one side.
Foreign/outside investment is many times a double edge sword. I've lived in Austin, San Francisco, and now NYC, cities that have transformed due to this kind of investment, and if you talk to locals many lament the building of expensive housing that prices out locals and upends the historical aesthetic of the city. Usually, jobs are created in the construction and retail sectors, but it's not a clear-cut positive for all locals. Granted I don't know the specifics of this case but it isn't cut and dry.
 
Oh wow, you don’t know the original 500m bond issue was in order to receive a much better fixed rate on the interest whilst paying off the horrendous PIK loans?

And you’re the one laughing :lol:




Partnership?

If you're going to google something, then maybe you should actually make sure you know that the bonds matured in 2017.

:rolleyes:


Why don't you open up our 20-F and actually look up our current situation.

We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with borrowings under our revolving facilities and our secured term loan facility, which bear interest at variable rates. Interest rate changes could impact the amount of our interest payments, and accordingly, our future earnings and cash flow, assuming other factors are held constant. We have entered into an interest rate swap related to a portion of our secured term loan facility that involves the exchange of floating for fixed rate interest payments in order to reduce interest rate volatility. As of 30 June 2022, we had £185.2 million of variable rate indebtedness outstanding under our secured term loan facility and £100.0 million of variable rate indebtedness outstanding under our revolving facilities. We cannot assure you that any hedging activities entered into by us will be effective in fully mitigating our interest rate risk from our variable rate indebtedness.

Why are you even trying to argue with someone who clearly knows a feck lot more than you about these topics?

Are you that fecking stubborn?

Not really even sure why you're being an arse to people on this board, when they clearly have valid opinions and facts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.