@Nou_Camp99 logged out 1 minute after @Adnan carried out a brutal verbal murder. It was a triple homicide. He’s not been seen since.
Club Sale | It’s done!
- Thread starter JB08
- Start date
- Status
Jim Radcliffe is a cnut. Ineos are bad. But small mercies, they know how to run a successful business. Worst case scenario, it doesn't work and they sell up. Absolutely no chance of the Qataris selling up if it all goes to shit. They will double down.
@Nou_Camp99 logged out 1 minute after @Adnan carried out a brutal verbal murder. It was a triple homicide. He’s not been seen since.
Mad, I hope they start posting again soon.
Here you go. After all the BS throughout this thread, this is by far the greatest highlight.I think it was on page 1600 of this thread. Normally I'm not a huge fan of going through someone's post histories to criticise them, but this was ridiculous
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/gla...-tweet-sources.474085/page-1601#post-30660807
The best part was saying there will be posters who’ll need to delete their posts about City’s owners because they’ve changed their minds. The irony.
It is not a full stop, it is a huge question mark for me over your logic. Qatari ownership will remove the debt, the Glazers and bring significant investment in infrastructure. I do not think this means cooking books or making illegal payments.
It came across that way, even if you didn't mean it.
I agree for what it's worth, we can play the game without having to cheat. So why do we need Qatari state money?
Need to get @Adnan a new tag line. ‘Slayer of WUMs’@Nou_Camp99 logged out 1 minute after @Adnan carried out a brutal verbal murder. It was a triple homicide. He’s not been seen since.
I'm yet to hear an explanation as to why would Ratcliffe invest a dime in the club without having full ownership. He'd be basically making other people richer. Anything from clearing the debt to investing in the stadium would make the Glazers richer.
He’s like a silent assassin. Man of few words but when he speaks, it’s a crime scene. Whole area is cordoned off.
Inappropriate Behavior
They were happy to bribe FIFA members, getting them to world cup, so I wouldn't put city type cheating past them.
We don’t need Qatari money per se. But we want the debt properly gone, Glazers properly gone and a lot of infrastructure investment.
Only one bidder is pledging all these - the other is pledging none of them.
If it was the other way ‘round, I’d want Ratcliffe, I assure you.
I'm sure if they come back they will be fine after a few more jokes. If anyone was unable to let it go after that they would be dealt with by the mods I imagine.
It’s probably the only way he could hope to beat Jassim. And maybe he’s not in it for the money, maybe he’s looking to leave a legacy - he’s getting on a bit.
Last edited:
That was Jassim and 92 Foundation who handled the Qatar WC bid…???
Or are all Qatari’s basically just one person / group?
That’s the point I was making a few pages back. Apparently pro Qatar fans want Mbappe and Neymar. It isn’t the case. We just want to be debt free, Glazer Free and infrastructure developments. Then continued spend of our own generated money on players.
It's never going to stop is it? Even when one of the two wins, the other camp will never let it drop. Are we doomed to have to sift through endless virtue signaling and political projection for another decade? Whoever the new owner is, I just hope they're competent, and only time will reveal that.
You see, I don't buy that "they know how to run a business" argument. Peter Lim who owns Valencia knows how to run a business. The former owner of Newcastle also happened to be a successful business man. INEOS Being a successful oil company doesn't mean they will be as successful running a football club (we also happened to have evidence by how they run NICE in france). And again as I stated in my last post, many fans are tired of seeing the club Being run like a profit seeking business. Being run like a business is what put us where we are today.
Excellent point. All Glazer and non-Glazer boats float if the valuation of the club grows, but Sir Jim can't be expected put in all the additional resources to lift those boats if he's only getting back 51% of the sea rise.
That's a bit of wishful thinking honestly.
How do you know how our finances will be structured? Debt is an inherit part of running a business even if you have liquidity.
You've heard nice stories from the Qataris but you have no idea what they will actually do
Sorry, I read your post that said “all” and thought that “all” implied people of manchester. I realize now it was all of your family you meant and referred to. My fault, hands down.
We don’t need large investment for the general running of the club and seasonal transfers/wages. However, we do need large investment for a stadium rebuild, training facilities, infrastructure etc. Our revenue alone would take far too long to cover that initial outlay required.
Not necessarily. If he contributes capital, most likely what will happen is the other shareholders' ownership stakes will be proportionally diluted.
No, it was not neither Jassim nor his father. Tony fecking Blair sanctioned killing thousands of people and sent a whole nation to a stone age. Shall I generalize and say that I would not put such cruelty past other British politicians? By the way, I am reporting your post. Neither SJ nor his father have been known to bribe UEFA. Your generalization is inappropriate to put it mildly.
Genuine question, how would that work? If he puts in more money his share gets bigger?
At least we have evidence of them actually running anything. Being run like a business is how every club in the world bar PSG and City operate.
I need to see the posts@Nou_Camp99 logged out 1 minute after @Adnan carried out a brutal verbal murder. It was a triple homicide. He’s not been seen since.
Yeah, basically the club would issue new shares corresponding to the value he invested, so his % of the club's total shares would go up and other investors' would go down.
Cheers for the explanation. Feel a bit better about it now.
If you’d had scrolled down a couple posts, instead of instantly replying, you’d have seen them.
Here you go. After all the BS throughout this thread, this is by far the greatest highlight.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/gla...-tweet-sources.474085/page-1601#post-30660807
The best part was saying there will be posters who’ll need to delete their posts about City’s owners because they’ve changed their minds. The irony.
I need to see the posts
They haven't really run NICE well if we are to go by comments of their fans. The club basically stagnated under INEOS and they fans have been baffled by board level decisions.
And actually, you are wrong about big clubs and profits. Barca and Madrid are fan owned clubs who put every single penny back into the club. Bayern literally had zero debt with the 50+1 rule keeping both sides of fans and cooperate in check.
There’s a Qatar news outlet on Twitter with almost 300k subs claiming the deal is done..not sure how reliable but
Al Watan is the source
Al Watan is the source
No worries at all my man, all good. Easy mistake to make.
Marl Goldbridge has double the followers on Twitter and he doesn't know his arse from his elbow.
And the owner of Al watan qatar is no one less then: Hamad bin Jassim Al Thani
Jassim's dad owns 50% of it, apparently.
It's owned by Hamad bin Jassim
Interesting. Never heard of them - going to dig through their feed and see what claims they had previously made about the deal.
Is….is it happening!!?
- Status