It's a post from a discussion that started with the City owner and then evolved into something different due to the poster that responded to me.feck is this doing in this thread???
It's a post from a discussion that started with the City owner and then evolved into something different due to the poster that responded to me.feck is this doing in this thread???
They've written several new articles tonight, some of which references their exclusive scoop. They are acting like its a done deal. If that is true, then perhaps the preferred bidder thing might already be happening and Raine could make an announcement within days.Slightly different angle tonight, it’s a race against time for the transfer window!
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/22331761/man-utd-summer-chaos-sir-jim-ratcliffe-takeover/
What??? For real???Can we stop calling Sir Jim “Rat” please. Google are threatening us with action. Those who do will be banned.
The only reason I would want Qatar to win the bid would be to see the confusion from the Qatari-stans when they don't spend 500m each window, and instead only spend 100-200m, because that's all that is allowed under FFP.
Instead, if Ineos wins, they'll think they're being cheap when they spend the same as Qatar would have, because they've built up these unrealistic fantasies. It's honestly going to be unfair to Ineos/SJR.
I have not seen anything from Messiers1994 for a while?Perhaps the real sale of the club was the friends we made along the way
Can we stop calling Sir Jim “Rat” please. Google are threatening us with action. Those who do will be banned.
RATcliffe will do.Can we stop calling Sir Jim “Rat” please. Google are threatening us with action. Those who do will be banned.
I’d be tempted to vote for this - there’s some amount of juvenile bollox in here.Can we stop calling Sir Jim “Rat” please. Google are threatening us with action. Those who do will be banned.
What?I’d be tempted to vote for this - there’s some amount of juvenile bollox in here.
If he can't accept being called things he doesn't like, owning Man United maybe not the best idea for him.To be fair, whether he's being serious or not, and his follow up post suggests he probably is... It's just childish and makes you look a bit of a clown.
It's like my kids calling me a poop. Though come to think of it, they're pro Qatar as well...
Is that a Young Boys joke?I’d be tempted to vote for this - there’s some amount of juvenile bollox in here.
Why Google? I don’t get it…To be fair, whether he's being serious or not, and his follow up post suggests he probably is... It's just childish and makes you look a bit of a clown.
It's like my kids calling me a poop. Though come to think of it, they're pro Qatar as well...
If he can't accept being called things he doesn't like, owning Man United maybe not the best idea for him.
This serious?Can we stop calling Sir Jim “Rat” please. Google are threatening us with action. Those who do will be banned.
Why Google? I don’t get it…
What position does he play?
You can think of them what you want, but preventing posters from name-calling Jim is some stupid level (north Korea level) of policing.To be fair, whether he's being serious or not, and his follow up post suggests he probably is... It's just childish and makes you look a bit of a clown.
It's like my kids calling me a poop. Though come to think of it, they're pro Qatar as well...
The last hope is if that the Qataris give in and completely blow INEOS out of the water, but that's unlikely. It sets a bad precedent. In any future investments, the seller will look at this case and know the Qataris will eventually cave in.
You can think of them what you want, but preventing posters from name-calling Jim is some stupid level (north Korea level) of policing.
You can think of them what you want, but preventing posters from name-calling Jim is some stupid level (north Korea level) of policing.
Can we stop calling Sir Jim “Rat” please. Google are threatening us with action. Those who do will be banned.
If it's real, I assume so. I don't see why Google would come here off their own back to get users to stop doing it. Why would they even care?Is it Ratcliffe complaining?
If it's real, I assume so. I don't see why Google would come here off their own back to get users to stop doing it. Why would they even care?
What % do we give Ineos V Sheikh Jassim at this current juncture?
Oh so now freedom mattersYou can think of them what you want, but preventing posters from name-calling Jim is some stupid level (north Korea level) of policing.
0 basis for this, in fact we can say Qatar are more like Boehly with them throwing money at problems.Those who were dead set against Qatar will see just how bad it can get, they’ll be begging for Qatar this time next year. I actually think Ratcliffe will be worse than the Glazers, at least the latter clowns generally stayed out of club interference albeit appointed incompetent people to run it. Ratcliffe looks like someone like Ted Boehly at Chelsea, thinks he can just come and be a big swinging dick and screw things up even more. Sad times.
Has anybody else noticed the absence of a certain muppetier reading, twitter posting protari guy since 10ish? His profile isnt available either…..
So he’s quiet because he’s presumably crying into his warm Pepsi at the prospect of an INEOS takeover ?!!They've set their profiles to private.
Well worth posting thisGuys, I don’t think you understand. If we are not allowed to call someone a rat, who will they come for next? Soon we will be treating people from other countries like slaves, women will be second class citizens and gay people won’t be allowed to exist! This is exactly why I support Qatar and can’t stand RAT man.
The worst possible outcome being treated like a guaranteed certainty is one of the more irritating trends with the United forum in general.