Spoony
The People's President
They will protest.
.
They will protest.
My thoughts exactly. This thing is still 50-50. Also, why is everyone certain the Sir Jim's bid is going to keep the Glazers in some capacity at United ? I saw some random news articles indicating 70% share purchase, but with United being listed on the NY Stock Exchange, shouldn't this sort of deal make things more complicated for the Glazers/Sir Jim as opposed to a full takeover.We are talkin about a multi billion pound take over with hundreds of laywers involved. A tweet from some random journo means nothing
They will protest.
My thoughts exactly. This thing is still 50-50. Also, why is everyone certain the Sir Jim's bid is going to keep the Glazers in some capacity at United ? I saw some random news articles indicating 70% share purchase, but with United being listed on the NY Stock Exchange, shouldn't this sort of deal make things more complicated for the Glazers/Sir Jim as opposed to a full takeover.
Who cares, Sir Jim has got the painters in for the Stretford End toilets. Just one coat mind.feck that's Mbappe at Liverpool then.
Are you fecking kidding me? They would not turn down the chance to dominate the league and rub it in United's face that it could have been us. Some really naive people in our fanbase.Liverpool fans won’t accept them
The new Chelsea owner, whose managed to undo all abramovich’s good work in less than a year and doing a great job running Chelsea into the ground. Big difference is that Chelsea are debt free, we are not so mistakes like incompetent new owners will be massively amplified .Who is Ted Boehly?
Who cares, Sir Jim has got the painters in for the Stretford End toilets. Just one coat mind.
Yep, they’ll have a moral high ground at least whilst Spurs or Scouse get rich new owners and lift the epl and champions league. Deluded folk.Are you fecking kidding me? They would not turn down the chance to dominate the league and rub it in United's face that it could have been us. Some really naive people in our fanbase.
Its definitely not CrownAs long as he's using Dulux does it matter?
They wouldn’t be able to rub anything in as they would just be another state owned entity, everything they mock City for who they have been competing with for the past 5 years. Also can’t see Jurgen Klopp working under such a regime.Are you fecking kidding me? They would not turn down the chance to dominate the league and rub it in United's face that it could have been us. Some really naive people in our fanbase.
NopeAnything actually happened to confirm :
1) Qatar aren’t going to get us.
2) They’ll move onto Liverpool
?
To be fair we probably wouldn't be debt free, either, as it is normal practice for clubs to pay transfer fees in installments.
We would have a better debt to income ratio and be able to do more without the Glazer's leveraged buyout, though.
I bumped into Sheikh Jassim outside Nando's and he started singing "Darwin, Darwin Nunez, he came from Benfica to the big Reds, it’s frightening with him and Luis Diaz. There is nobody else like Darwin Nunez." He also told me Joel and Avram were buying out their siblings and taking full control of the club, announced tomorrow.Anything actually happened to confirm :
1) Qatar aren’t going to get us.
2) They’ll move onto Liverpool
?
They won’t. The media want Liverpool at the top of European football.They will protest.
I suppose so but we'd be cutting our coat according to the size of our cloth, and we'd have a bloody big bolt to cut from.
Trust me, you don’t realise the duality of people if you really think that. They will love their state backed owners who will buy them the best players, build them a great stadium, and Klopp will get an unlimited budget so he’ll suddenly love Qatar.They wouldn’t be able to rub anything in as they would just be another state owned entity, everything they mock City for who they have been competing with for the past 5 years. Also can’t see Jurgen Klopp working under such a regime.
‘Todd’The new Chelsea owner, whose managed to undo all abramovich’s good work in less than a year and doing a great job running Chelsea into the ground. Big difference is that Chelsea are debt free, we are not so mistakes like incompetent new owners will be massively amplified .
I wouldn’t read too much in the Utd stock price tanking.United share price nosediving proper style.
When the shit goes down, insane in the membrane stuff.
Trust me, you don’t realise the duality of people if you really think that. They will love their state backed owners who will buy them the best players, build them a great stadium, and Klopp will get an unlimited budget so he’ll suddenly love Qatar.
"Chad"‘Todd’
If big Jim was spending £400 mill a year net spend on transfers, I think we would be very happy. Dont see anywhere near that unfortunatelyThe only reason I would want Qatar to win the bid would be to see the confusion from the Qatari-stans when they don't spend 500m each window, and instead only spend 100-200m, because that's all that is allowed under FFP.
Instead, if Ineos wins, they'll think they're being cheap when they spend the same as Qatar would have, because they've built up these unrealistic fantasies. It's honestly going to be unfair to Ineos/SJR.
Fair enough butCan we stop calling Sir Jim “Rat” please. Google are threatening us with action. Those who do will be banned.
What position does he play?It's so hard to take some arguments in here seriously when you're seeing "Ratcliffe is literally Todd Boehly!" in the same breath as "Liverpool will buy Mbappe, Haaland, the Taj Mahal with Qatari ownership and win everything!"
Can we stop calling Sir Jim “Rat” please. Google are threatening us with action. Those who do will be banned.
Who cares, Sir Jim has got the painters in for the Stretford End toilets. Just one coat mind.
As long as he's using Dulux does it matter?
Its definitely not Crown
Can we stop calling Sir Jim “Rat” please. Google are threatening us with action. Those who do will be banned.
This is a subtle windup, right?Might be worth adding this to the rules so nobody has an excuse.