City and Financial Doping | Charged by PL with numerous FFP breaches | Hearing begins 16th September 2024

This lot won't even show the FA there evidence that there not a bunch of cheating bastards, if your innocent of anything and you can prove it, then Show the World?? Apparently they don't have to because there still trying to use the time lapse shit... throw them out of the league let them keep all what they've won by cheating..
 
This is a perfectly fair comment not a dig at all. My feelings on City are genuinely mixed but the truth is I can't walk away. In an ideal world we wouldn't be owned by who we are but sadly we are. But City are still City and will be City long after Abu Dhabi are gone, I've got no issue with following us in the conference or at the top. United will always be United, you've been through 20 years of leeches and it kinda sucks whats gonna follow but just remember that the club will be there long after the ownership.
With regards City the club is a huge part of my life and a big bond I share with my mother and her side of the family (my dad being Irish is of course a United fan, thank God not a Pool fan), even if my mother only really got into football to wind up my dad. No owners are gonna take that from me nor should I let them. The same will apply to you guys.

When I say root and branch I don't think its possible globablly but is it possible for Fifa/Uefa with football to be consistent. Something like.

"Right all ownership is going to be dealt with based on proper fit and proper persons tests not the nonsense we have now!"
"Gear manufacturers using sweatshops are going to have to prove they've gotten with the times to be allowed to have their logo's on football gear".
"If we're outlawing questionable middle Eastern owners we also have to outlaw questionable middle eastern sponsorship" for example how can you tell UAE they can't own a club but allow the sponsorship of the Emirates Stadium. It reeks of hypocrisy. "You're cnuts and murderers and can't own x, but we'll happily take your money and plaster you on our stadiums, shirts, stores etc..."
If we're banning ME sponsorship based on HR records we have to look at tech giants (not that its an issue in England as far as I know).

Basically football needs to go all in, it can't draw a line or it reeks. Like I said imagine rocking up to City with a banner about human rights when 10% of you ownership is human rights abusing Adidas, it reeks of fan hypocrisy. Even if it fecked City over I'd be all for cleaning football, but saying Abu Dhabi can't own a club but can sponsor a stadium or shirt, it just makes zero sense. Its the same blood money and if its in, its in or out its out (it should be out)

Apologies, I misunderstood with the all or nothing, root and branch thing. I don't think it is possible in football though either, horse has long since bolted the stable. All money is dirty and until the way the whole world is run changes (which ain't happening anytime soon) it will stay that way.

Fair enough with City just being part of you. Most of my family are Blues and I would say my friend circle is 70:30 in City's favour and feel exactly the same as you, that is, if I'm reading it right, not very supportive of the means but enjoying the ends. All of them are Mancs, working class, dress to the left (as it were) and are good people. I just think being on board with gaining success via geopolitical todger swinging and HR abuses is more understandable from a City fans perspective than a Utd fans. It's been a bad 10 years by our standards granted and 100% made worse by it being City and Liverpool that are so good but compared to most teams its been alright, been dull but picked up a few bits and bobs and as I've said before, I just can't see any success being enjoyable knowing people had to suffer for it.

I hope I am not coming across all on my high horse (although I do look nice on my high horse), I am just a bit sad really that I might lose a something that is a big part of my life, especially when I think ETH has us on the right track and we could get back to the top eventually regardless. So pleased I got to enjoy a trophy this year. Who knows though? Maybe if we win the quad next year having loaned Donnarumma, Hakimi, Marquinhos, Verratti and Mbappe then I might be scaling Old Trafford wearing nothing but a Gutra and I can have all of these hypocritical words thrown back in my stupid face but sadly I suspect I wouldn't be that fussed.

Anyway, apologies for the late response, had hit my daily limit when you got back yesterday. And double apologies for derailing the thread too seen as it is supposed to be about the financial side of things. Don't know what there is to say about that though, I mean everybody knew that was happening right? One of my City fan mates works for the club, quite near to the first team (won't go into any detail) and his paycheck has no mention of Manchester City on it!
 
I clearly seperated my points on state ownership and cheating no? Like literally said there in the post cheating should be punished?
This is a thread specifically on your clubs cheating…and it doesn’t just stop at numbers on a balance sheet. The corruption is off the scale. It’s in no way comparable to being ‘sponsored by adidas’ but the nature of your post was to insinuate that everyone is at it.
 
This is a thread specifically on your clubs cheating…and it doesn’t just stop at numbers on a balance sheet. The corruption is off the scale. It’s in no way comparable to being ‘sponsored by adidas’ but the nature of your post was to insinuate that everyone is at it.

No it wasn't thats some serious mental gymnastics, the debate about state ownership and City's cheating are completely different discussions and one I was pretty much asked to elaborate on a few times in the thead. I in no way compared the cheating discussion to Adidas, I really don't know where you guys pull this shite from but its certainly not from my posts.
 
Last edited:
Sorry but that's a lame excuse. You are trying to justify it by saying everybody does a little so why cant we do a lot. There is a big difference between a giant company that tries to run a clean operation (and employs armies of people in Germany to do so) but occasionally gets it wrong, versus a country that doesn't give two fecks about human rights and will happily murder and abuse thousands of people if their face doesn't fit.

If the PL can see past the brown envelopes to find them guilty, they need to make an example and show that it can't be tolerated. If they don't, football is finished and every oligarch and dictator on the planet will be getting involved.

They don't try to run a clean operation, they give lip service, if they wanted a clean operation, they'd have one but they want to keep costs low and making bank. Are adidas the same as ADUG? Hell no!, not even close but are they guilty of building their brand and still cashing in on human rights abuse? Absolutely whilst sitting proudly as co-owners of one of the biggest football clubs in history. But the real hypocrisy is Bayern fans allowing it to stand whilst preaching at others no?

I do think state ownership should be the first thing dealt with and needs to go in the end, but there is a long list that needs to follow.
 
Apologies, I misunderstood with the all or nothing, root and branch thing. I don't think it is possible in football though either, horse has long since bolted the stable. All money is dirty and until the way the whole world is run changes (which ain't happening anytime soon) it will stay that way.

Fair enough with City just being part of you. Most of my family are Blues and I would say my friend circle is 70:30 in City's favour and feel exactly the same as you, that is, if I'm reading it right, not very supportive of the means but enjoying the ends. All of them are Mancs, working class, dress to the left (as it were) and are good people. I just think being on board with gaining success via geopolitical todger swinging and HR abuses is more understandable from a City fans perspective than a Utd fans. It's been a bad 10 years by our standards granted and 100% made worse by it being City and Liverpool that are so good but compared to most teams its been alright, been dull but picked up a few bits and bobs and as I've said before, I just can't see any success being enjoyable knowing people had to suffer for it.

I hope I am not coming across all on my high horse (although I do look nice on my high horse), I am just a bit sad really that I might lose a something that is a big part of my life, especially when I think ETH has us on the right track and we could get back to the top eventually regardless. So pleased I got to enjoy a trophy this year. Who knows though? Maybe if we win the quad next year having loaned Donnarumma, Hakimi, Marquinhos, Verratti and Mbappe then I might be scaling Old Trafford wearing nothing but a Gutra and I can have all of these hypocritical words thrown back in my stupid face but sadly I suspect I wouldn't be that fussed.

Anyway, apologies for the late response, had hit my daily limit when you got back yesterday. And double apologies for derailing the thread too seen as it is supposed to be about the financial side of things. Don't know what there is to say about that though, I mean everybody knew that was happening right? One of my City fan mates works for the club, quite near to the first team (won't go into any detail) and his paycheck has no mention of Manchester City on it!

Not at all dude. Fair point in the first sentence. While it may be more understandable, no one should actively support these regimes at all. I actually can't wait for the day City are under new ownership to be honest. When I look back at my older posts (thankfully before I joined the Caf) when I didn't understand the real situation in those countries I'm kinda embarrassed. But at the same time I'd be completely indifferent to Qatar buying United, or Liverpool because it sadly is what it is now. Football has always been rotten, its just rotten on a whole new level as happens when the money becomes bigger.

You're not being on a high horse at all, if I'm genuinely honest, success feels weird at City, its a case of enjoying the team (which is amazing), whilst knowing what it took and who built it (which sucks). Its why I don't really go crazy celebrating on here or rubbing in how good a team we are unless I'm winding up someone who I feel deserves it, or who is constantly giving it to me.

What I will say is United are and always will be more than whoever owns the club, as are City, as are Chelsea etc... Hopefully the nonsense at City get dealt with soon so the club can get their shit together (fairly).
 
They don't try to run a clean operation, they give lip service, if they wanted a clean operation, they'd have one but they want to keep costs low and making bank. Are adidas the same as ADUG? Hell no!, not even close but are they guilty of building their brand and still cashing in on human rights abuse? Absolutely whilst sitting proudly as co-owners of one of the biggest football clubs in history. But the real hypocrisy is Bayern fans allowing it to stand whilst preaching at others no?

I do think state ownership should be the first thing dealt with and needs to go in the end, but there is a long list that needs to follow.

I actually know some of the people who do that job at Adidas. They fly around the world checking up on factories and warehouses. They do try very hard to keep things clean but with such a large operation sometimes things slip through, mostly dodgy factory owners trying to con them. Nothing like what Abu Dhabi do.
 
Mentioned in passing by Gary Lineker on MotD. Glossed over by Shearer.

Discussion over, move on.

Basically, no one gives a shit. They'll get away with it, no doubt about it.
This is it. It's not in Sky/BT/BBC's interest to sully the Premier League, the greatest league in the world™. They'll address it and push it aside so that we can all just watch Haaland "sock a few dingers".

 
Champions of England is all I’m seeing over Facebook. Makes me sick man!
 
Whats the likely punishment they can expect IF found guilty?
 
I hope no one on here is gullible enough to believe they will get properly punished (Points deduction). Your just in for a huge disappointment in a few months time when they are let off with some poxy fines.
 
I hope no one on here is gullible enough to believe they will get properly punished (Points deduction). Your just in for a huge disappointment in a few months time when they are let off with some poxy fines.

While I'm prepared to agree that it's unlikely, I do think there's some chance that the book will be thrown at them.

The Premier League has one thing going for it above all else: its reputation for competition and a uniformly high level. It has been a league that is either not dominated by any one team, or dominated by one team because that club clearly deserves to rule English football on a premise of fairness that is understood in English culture. I'm not just fellating myself in saying that, I'm not English, but it's a country that does have a measure of belief in the notion that success and power ought to be earned. Probably stems from times when such a thing was won militarily. The sun never sets on bla-bla.

And while one would be silly to think that England still embodies that wholeheartedly, I do think that football is the place that has it closest to heart. It certainly isn't politics, so let's say it's football. There's still pride in being the tough, competitive league where it takes a little more to excel, and where there's only pride in earning it the traditional way, as opposed to just being successful because it was automatically granted. There's all this talk of whether or not some foreign player can make it in the Premier League. There's even some merit to that, although it's not as true now as it may have been in the days of Roy Keane, Patrick Vieira and Vinnie Jones. It's still part of the culture of English football. It isn't yet gone altogether.

For that reason, there's some hope (but no guarantee) that this notion will be taken into account when it comes to the investigation of MCFC. If they choose not to, they know that they're giving up the last vestiges of what used to represent English football. There's not so much of it left these days, but it isn't entirely gone, and selling out entirely to a human rights sportswashing effort will mean that nobody can ever again evoke that spirit. It would be right, in that event, to laugh mockingly at anyone who says that there's anything special about the Prem.

I do think that at least some of the people charged with the decision in question would keep that in mind. Whether or not that'll be enough to make the decision that anyone with any sense knows is right, that remains to be seen. But I don't think it's hopeless, or gullible to hope for it. It takes a willfully blind person to call City innocent, and it comes with a declaration that English football is nothing special anymore, and that whoever has enough money can erase all that used to make it special. I do think that there's still enough resistance to that in English culture to make the right decision.

It's still the country behind the Magna Carta and the declaration of war in 1939. That's not entirely gone yet. It's still a small piece of what makes up the English football heritage, i.e. that it's rooted in real culture and deserves to be representative of the people's voice. Even if eight tenths of that notion has been eroded by money, I really think that they won't let money scour away the last two tenths, because everyone knows that City are guilty.
 
Last edited:
I hope no one on here is gullible enough to believe they will get properly punished (Points deduction). Your just in for a huge disappointment in a few months time when they are let off with some poxy fines.
They'll probably get fined and a transfer ban at most, then the fans will carry on believing they're not guilty like with the UEFA case
 
I hope no one on here is gullible enough to believe they will get properly punished (Points deduction). Your just in for a huge disappointment in a few months time when they are let off with some poxy fines.
They were never going to be fined, kicked out of competitions, etc. The horse has bolted and they (quite rightly) will fight dirty and take a stand.

The media are complicit in all of this. Going on about competition, not questioning owners, drooling over this City team without discussing or ripping apart how it came to be. You can't just judge them on the pitch.

Sky should be delighted that City have won another league title.
 
If Man Utd were doing good on field, Man Utd fans wont even mention city's financial doping, but at the moment thats the only stick they are left to beat man city with. And, they dont want anyone to talk abt the fact that Man Utd's net expenditure easily matches city's or even higher....fact is pep has totally transformed man city and Man Utd are jut playing catchup game now and it can easily be decades for them before they win title, and thats why all this bitterness. Fans all over the world just want to see their teams playing fantastic football , scoring goals and winning titles...and only one team in manchester seems to be doing all that at the moment, while fans of other one are left with no choice but to badmouth city's success...
 
I hope no one on here is gullible enough to believe they will get properly punished (Points deduction). Your just in for a huge disappointment in a few months time when they are let off with some poxy fines.
If they get a points deduction I'd image it will be just low enough to keep them in 1st place.
 
I still think they'll be relegated... Financial doping just shouldn't be a thing. It doesn't happen is US sports in the same way because they realise long term it damages the product a lot.

Football needs to sort it self out. It shouldn't be mainly an economic competition, need sort it at UEFA level as well as notionally. Need a team level salary cap, easy to enforce and will level the playing field financially to a large degree. Sort the structure out so all clubs accept it.
 
While I'm prepared to agree that it's unlikely, I do think there's some chance that the book will be thrown at them.

The Premier League has one thing going for it above all else: its reputation for competition and a uniformly high level. It has been a league that is either not dominated by any one team, or dominated by one team because that club clearly deserves to rule English football on a premise of fairness that is understood in English culture. I'm not just fellating myself in saying that, I'm not English, but it's a country that does have a measure of belief in the notion that success and power ought to be earned. Probably stems from times when such a thing was won militarily. The sun never sets on bla-bla.

And while one would be silly to think that England still embodies that wholeheartedly, I do think that football is the place that has it closest to heart. It certainly isn't politics, so let's say it's football. There's still pride in being the tough, competitive league where it takes a little more to excel, and where there's only pride in earning it the traditional way, as opposed to just being successful because it was automatically granted. There's all this talk of whether or not some foreign player can make it in the Premier League. There's even some merit to that, although it's not as true now as it may have been in the days of Roy Keane, Patrick Vieira and Vinnie Jones. It's still part of the culture of English football. It isn't yet gone altogether.

For that reason, there's some hope (but no guarantee) that this notion will be taken into account when it comes to the investigation of MCFC. If they choose not to, they know that they're giving up the last vestiges of what used to represent English football. There's not so much of it left these days, but it isn't entirely gone, and selling out entirely to a human rights sportswashing effort will mean that nobody can ever again evoke that spirit. It would be right, in that event, to laugh mockingly at anyone who says that there's anything special about the Prem.

I do think that at least some of the people charged with the decision in question would keep that in mind. Whether or not that'll be enough to make the decision that anyone with any sense knows is right, that remains to be seen. But I don't think it's hopeless, or gullible to hope for it. It takes a willfully blind person to call City innocent, and it comes with a declaration that English football is nothing special anymore, and that whoever has enough money can erase all that used to make it special. I do think that there's still enough resistance to that in English culture to make the right decision.

It's still the country behind the Magna Carta and the declaration of war in 1939. That's not entirely gone yet. It's still a small piece of what makes up the English football heritage, i.e. that it's rooted in real culture and deserves to be representative of the people's voice. Even if eight tenths of that notion has been eroded by money, I really think that they won't let money scour away the last two tenths, because everyone knows that City are guilty.

A really interesting and thoughtful post, as as an Englishman (with a lot of Welsh and some Irish) ancestry, I would agree with those comments about the culture of fair play, 'playing the game', etc.
However, I think the sad fact is that the genie is well and truly out of the bottle. The UK has been largely ruled by neoliberals / neo-cons / libertarians since 1979, and I would include Tony Blair as fundamentally a neoliberal. Deregulation is the norm; markets are essentially fetishized; and money rules everything. I think I am correct in stating that the Edwards family were one of the first to end the model of private ownership when they floated United to save their meat business in the early 1980s. In this they were guided by MU director professor Roland Smith. Once that genie was out of the bottle it is difficult to go back unless, like City, wealthy and corrupt states are willing to sink in billions. And then control is lost completely.

The top clubs themselves were only too eager to remove themselves from the restrictions and regulations of the Football League and get their hands on more of the TV and advertising money, hence the emergence of the Premier League. It was extremely unlikely that the then Major neoliberal government (although he WAS a sports fan - but favoured cricket) would intervene when they were busy selling off virtually every UK asset like public utilities and transport systems.

I think it would take a very brave government to take charge of the current mess. I think there would be three main considerations / barriers: first, the clubs would probably challenge any legislation as a restriction on trade. The clubs cannot be viewed in isolation from European competition, etc, so that might be a challenge to any form of regulation unless it was Europe wide as some posters have suggested. And perhaps most importantly, in terms of UK wealth and prestige, the Premier League is one of the few success stories over the last few decades. But the last point does support your consideration that it needs to retain its Englishness and competitiveness to remain attractive.

I know there have been some City fans acknowledging personal disquiet at what has happened to City, and some of my City friends share those concerns, but any truly reflective fan must wonder what this current outfit, owned by Abu Dhabi, with a virtually non-English management and coaching staff, a different ground and virtually no connection with the former club except the colour of the shirt. In what sense is it the same club. Do we want that for United?
 
City gets 1 pt deduction and forced to play Sat noon fixture permanently. EPL will announce a big win and deserved punishment for the Cheaty. Edit: forgot a 72-hour transfer ban in October 2023.
 
They should receive a joint punishment with Barcelona. The two of them can play each other every week for a season in a super league of two. The winner gets promoted to Saudi Arabia. The loser gets abolished.
 
If Man Utd were doing good on field, Man Utd fans wont even mention city's financial doping, but at the moment thats the only stick they are left to beat man city with. And, they dont want anyone to talk abt the fact that Man Utd's net expenditure easily matches city's or even higher....fact is pep has totally transformed man city and Man Utd are jut playing catchup game now and it can easily be decades for them before they win title, and thats why all this bitterness. Fans all over the world just want to see their teams playing fantastic football , scoring goals and winning titles...and only one team in manchester seems to be doing all that at the moment, while fans of other one are left with no choice but to badmouth city's success...
Yeah because we never went in on Chelsea when they got oil money while we were winning titles and the CL :rolleyes:
 
Mentioned in passing by Gary Lineker on MotD. Glossed over by Shearer.

Discussion over, move on.

Basically, no one gives a shit. They'll get away with it, no doubt about it.

Shearer's the last person to call it out when he's banking on Newcastle following the same model.
 
I still think they'll be relegated... Financial doping just shouldn't be a thing. It doesn't happen is US sports in the same way because they realise long term it damages the product a lot.

Football needs to sort it self out. It shouldn't be mainly an economic competition, need sort it at UEFA level as well as notionally. Need a team level salary cap, easy to enforce and will level the playing field financially to a large degree. Sort the structure out so all clubs accept it.
No chance in hell they they relegated. No chance in hell they even get any title vacated. Maximum will be a fine and a transfer ban. This is European football we are talking about here. Very few other professions are as compromised by dirty money. The PL and UEFA made their respective positions clear when they allowed Man City, Newcastle and PSG to be bought over by sovereign states with no conseqiences. Other big clubs have no choice but to fall in line now. Survival of the fittest.
 
I don't know why I only thought about this today but with the precedent set by the RFU and Lord Dyson regarding the Saracens in 2020. The potential sanction for City is pretty obvious?
 
Yeah because we never went in on Chelsea when they got oil money while we were winning titles and the CL :rolleyes:
sure a mention here and there, but definitely no 89 page long thread and still going on...
 
Sky Sports are insufferable talking about them. No mention of the 115 charges against them to allow them to get to where they are now.
 
They should receive a joint punishment with Barcelona. The two of them can play each other every week for a season in a super league of two. The winner gets promoted to Saudi Arabia. The loser gets abolished.

I mentioned to one of my City fan friends that the full implication of state ownership is some kind of franchise or transfer of the club somewhere else (like US sports teams have done). He laughed it off, but it is a possibility. Apart from the City of Manchester stadium and Foden, which bit of City has any link with the city? The Euro superleague, which will happen unless there is a concerted effort by the big European governments, may just be the start. 'Manchester' City playing their 'home' games in Abu Dhabi! It would be terrible and hilarious in equal measure. The fact is they can't fill their stadium in Manchester, so why not?
 
While I'm prepared to agree that it's unlikely, I do think there's some chance that the book will be thrown at them.

The Premier League has one thing going for it above all else: its reputation for competition and a uniformly high level. It has been a league that is either not dominated by any one team, or dominated by one team because that club clearly deserves to rule English football on a premise of fairness that is understood in English culture. I'm not just fellating myself in saying that, I'm not English, but it's a country that does have a measure of belief in the notion that success and power ought to be earned. Probably stems from times when such a thing was won militarily. The sun never sets on bla-bla.

And while one would be silly to think that England still embodies that wholeheartedly, I do think that football is the place that has it closest to heart. It certainly isn't politics, so let's say it's football. There's still pride in being the tough, competitive league where it takes a little more to excel, and where there's only pride in earning it the traditional way, as opposed to just being successful because it was automatically granted. There's all this talk of whether or not some foreign player can make it in the Premier League. There's even some merit to that, although it's not as true now as it may have been in the days of Roy Keane, Patrick Vieira and Vinnie Jones. It's still part of the culture of English football. It isn't yet gone altogether.

For that reason, there's some hope (but no guarantee) that this notion will be taken into account when it comes to the investigation of MCFC. If they choose not to, they know that they're giving up the last vestiges of what used to represent English football. There's not so much of it left these days, but it isn't entirely gone, and selling out entirely to a human rights sportswashing effort will mean that nobody can ever again evoke that spirit. It would be right, in that event, to laugh mockingly at anyone who says that there's anything special about the Prem.

I do think that at least some of the people charged with the decision in question would keep that in mind. Whether or not that'll be enough to make the decision that anyone with any sense knows is right, that remains to be seen. But I don't think it's hopeless, or gullible to hope for it. It takes a willfully blind person to call City innocent, and it comes with a declaration that English football is nothing special anymore, and that whoever has enough money can erase all that used to make it special. I do think that there's still enough resistance to that in English culture to make the right decision.

It's still the country behind the Magna Carta and the declaration of war in 1939. That's not entirely gone yet. It's still a small piece of what makes up the English football heritage, i.e. that it's rooted in real culture and deserves to be representative of the people's voice. Even if eight tenths of that notion has been eroded by money, I really think that they won't let money scour away the last two tenths, because everyone knows that City are guilty.
My man! Only thing you forgot mentioning were the pirates at sea, the spider mule, and railroads connecting the Free Men! ;)

A really interesting and thoughtful post, as as an Englishman (with a lot of Welsh and some Irish) ancestry, I would agree with those comments about the culture of fair play, 'playing the game', etc.
However, I think the sad fact is that the genie is well and truly out of the bottle. The UK has been largely ruled by neoliberals / neo-cons / libertarians since 1979, and I would include Tony Blair as fundamentally a neoliberal. Deregulation is the norm; markets are essentially fetishized; and money rules everything. I think I am correct in stating that the Edwards family were one of the first to end the model of private ownership when they floated United to save their meat business in the early 1980s. In this they were guided by MU director professor Roland Smith. Once that genie was out of the bottle it is difficult to go back unless, like City, wealthy and corrupt states are willing to sink in billions. And then control is lost completely.

The top clubs themselves were only too eager to remove themselves from the restrictions and regulations of the Football League and get their hands on more of the TV and advertising money, hence the emergence of the Premier League. It was extremely unlikely that the then Major neoliberal government (although he WAS a sports fan - but favoured cricket) would intervene when they were busy selling off virtually every UK asset like public utilities and transport systems.

I think it would take a very brave government to take charge of the current mess. I think there would be three main considerations / barriers: first, the clubs would probably challenge any legislation as a restriction on trade. The clubs cannot be viewed in isolation from European competition, etc, so that might be a challenge to any form of regulation unless it was Europe wide as some posters have suggested. And perhaps most importantly, in terms of UK wealth and prestige, the Premier League is one of the few success stories over the last few decades. But the last point does support your consideration that it needs to retain its Englishness and competitiveness to remain attractive.

I know there have been some City fans acknowledging personal disquiet at what has happened to City, and some of my City friends share those concerns, but any truly reflective fan must wonder what this current outfit, owned by Abu Dhabi, with a virtually non-English management and coaching staff, a different ground and virtually no connection with the former club except the colour of the shirt. In what sense is it the same club. Do we want that for United?
Dare I say that Swiss non-mainstream media use to portray Brexit as a potential start into your supponed direction?

Although in the middle of continental Europe, we sort of share with GB a self-understanding of being islanders. Us being surrounded by four former empires that to this day seem to struggle with the loss of influence they once enjoyed, and for the better part spared from the misery of two world wars, and having gone through a period of relative wealth, obtained by a generation of hard working people who knew all too well where we came from - poverty - we deeply feel what isolates us from our neighbors with their aristocratic culture remains. Nice to read the spirit lives on on your island, let me toast you from ours.
 
My man! Only thing you forgot mentioning were the pirates at sea, the spider mule, and railroads connecting the Free Men! ;)


Dare I say that Swiss non-mainstream media use to portray Brexit as a potential start into your supponed direction?

Although in the middle of continental Europe, we sort of share with GB a self-understanding of being islanders. Us being surrounded by four former empires that to this day seem to struggle with the loss of influence they once enjoyed, and for the better part spared from the misery of two world wars, and having gone through a period of relative wealth, obtained by a generation of hard working people who knew all too well where we came from - poverty - we deeply feel what isolates us from our neighbors with their aristocratic culture remains. Nice to read the spirit lives on on your island, let me toast you from ours.

Greetings to Switzerland. Brexit was the end point of neoliberalism, not the start. But it certainly makes European wide legislation harder to enact.