We were the 6th highest PL spenders in the 90s. We spent a fair bit between 2001-02 but abramovich came in the year after and inflated it for everyone.
City and Financial Doping | Charged by PL with 130 FFP breaches | Hearing begins 16th Sep 2024 | Concluded 9th Dec 2024 - Awaiting outcome
- Thread starter VanGaalEra
- Start date
Exactly. The notion that we outspent everyone under Fergie is a myth.
Yes because we had so many academy players. When we spent we often paid quite a bit.
We did, but it’s a myth that we had success because we had the most money.
Very true. But we did affect the market which I think was the original point.
When did we really affect the market during Sir Alex's time? We were outspent by other clubs in most of Sir Alex's Premier League seasons and most of the time when we spent big on a player it was because it was from another Premier League club so was always going to cost us more and was still less than what the Italian and Spanish clubs were trading players for.
How much you spend in total isn't as important as how much you spend on individual players.
We were the fourth biggest spenders between 92-2014.
So even if you add on a decade, we're still nowhere near the top.
We broke the British record three times in that era with Cole, Veron and Ferdinand.
But i'd argue it was Blackburn who had moved the market up buying Sutton for 5m 6months before.
And after Cole, Collymore went for 8.5m
Newcastle took the world record to 15m for Shearer - that could have been us, but obviously wasn't.
But to me it feels like Chelsea and City were far more responsible for repeatedly warping the market.
Chelsea were dishing out repeated 20m + fees in the early 2000s and City escalated the price of a full back to 50m!
Plus 45m or whatever Tevez was suspected to be 15 years before the time that was the price for an average forward or midfield squaddie!
Yea they all affected the market also.
Chelsea had the biggest affect for me, they changed things quite rapidly.
Rooney was also the record for someone at that rage group. Pogba also broke the record. Obviously these 2 were later on.
Weren't Chelsea also offering all/much of the agreed fee up front? I seem to recall that being a huge way to secure agreements along with offering higher wages; like Robben, although United dropped the ball there by low-balling PSV after initial pre-agreement.
Yeah that will be it for Premier League, rest of sides should refuse to play them but haven't the guts
3 signings this Jan and also 9 years contract for Haaland suggesting either they're gonna get nothing or they're are preparing for a transfer ban in the summer and minor points deduction.
They have definitely paid someone off, turned this league into a right fraud as well
Sportwashing done right.
Rooney did have quite the temper.
Age :P
Cnut
Whole thing is a fecking farce whilst we have to sell off assets just to make any signings
A cocky cnut who will be humbled in a few years
Glad he's playing in the same era as Vini, Mbappe, Yamal etc.
Means this wanker probably never wins the Balon D'or.
He’s becoming increasingly annoying but I read that thought… damn, he’s actually quite lucky that that’s the top competition.
City certainly have a bit of swagger don't they? I mean it's bloody obvious they've got away with it but what does that mean for the Prem in future? And everyone who's played by the rules?
That will depend on the other clubs. City would not survive long if the traditional clubs formed a breakaway league but I doubt they have the stomach for it.
I think they know they’ve gotten away with it, or will face an extremely lenient ‘punishment’. Stripping them of their titles or a relegation doesn’t seem on the cards at all.
Im sure they will got away with 115. Im sure the reason will be pretty like - inssufcient number of copies of exhibit #2356
I think they’ll get a transfer ban and they know it so they are doing as much they can in this window
Stripping them of their titles or a relegation is too much hassle. A slap on the wrist fine, a minor point deduction, maybe a transfer ban.
People will complain, nothing happens, City challenge for the league next season.
City losing a run of games introduces jeopardy into city’s inevitable 5 in a row canter. Intentionally or not, it creates a little sideshow. Signing meathead until the year 3000 paints a picture, too. It says, ‘no matter what happens, we are not going away quietly!
Wish I had one
Real Valladolid not happy with them. Translated from their homepage
https://www.realvalladolid.es/noticias/comunicado-oficial-abdulai-juma-bah
https://www.realvalladolid.es/noticias/comunicado-oficial-abdulai-juma-bah
PFftt.. its but even #116
Disgusting behaviour from City
Absolutely disgusting club. Vile from top to bottom and if this is how they behave when there's some scrutiny just imagine the level of filth they were up to all those years.
Comfortably the most rancid club in football history - and a complete insult to players and fans of when they were actually Manchester City and not a middle Eastern cheating franchise
Comfortably the most rancid club in football history - and a complete insult to players and fans of when they were actually Manchester City and not a middle Eastern cheating franchise
They certainly know how to cheat, and how to try and squirm their way out of it, that's for sure.
Think they're being too cocky and pushing their luck. It's a front.
Steal a player who in the grand scheme of things won't amount to anything and packed on his way but this is what City do.
A front? That’s an interesting take. I like that you think any luck whatsoever is involved.
So, still nothing?