Strong statement to make. It could be that if he was slotted back into a centre-mid position, with the experience he's had at Barca.. he could be a revelation as his dribbling ability and play in tight areas has improved. He is just very unsuited to their style of play - not saying he's definitely better or regressed, but if he is anywhere near his Arsenal level - he'd be what we need.
Umm, I agree he's unsuited to their style of play, but his dribbling ability and play in tight areas haven't improved. They're two key reasons why he isn't suited there, he can't take the ball past players like Iniesta can and he isn't great when he's pressed.
Compared to Iniesta/Xavi.. anyone would struggle. Compared to your average centre-mid, he'd be fine.
Obviously, that's why I think he'd be a great midfielder in any team other than Barcelona. His dribbling and ability in tight space hasn't improved at all since he moved to Barcelona though, and I'm not sure what relevance comparisons with Iniesta/Xavi have there...
Do we believe the rumours, that we're back in for Fabregas? Personally, I do not want yet another 'playmaker'. I'd take Barkley over him to be honest.
There's just none of the warrior about him. He didn't play like Barcelona was the centre of his existence & that's what I'm looking for.Wont surprise me. We need more than 1 CM anyways.
There's just none of the warrior about him. He didn't play like Barcelona was the centre of his existence & that's what I'm looking for.
Yep, commitment. For me Fabs performances have been similar to many at United this season. He's not the type to take the game by the scruff of the neck, to take responsibility as the younger, fitter player, for lifting the older legs around him - he's not for me.You mean he's not committed enough? Sorry, I didnt get what you really mean with the warrior bit.
Yep, commitment. For me Fabs performances have been similar to many at United this season. He's not the type to take the game by the scruff of the neck, to take responsibility as the younger, fitter player, for lifting the older legs around him - he's not for me.
Barca might want to sell him this Summer but it won't be to us, he will have plenty of CL teams after him and I think he still has a soft spot for Arsenal and would pick them ahead of us if it came to this choice.
Why, what kind of player is Barkley?Do we believe the rumours, that we're back in for Fabregas? Personally, I do not want yet another 'playmaker'. I'd take Barkley over him to be honest.
Do we believe the rumours, that we're back in for Fabregas? Personally, I do not want yet another 'playmaker'. I'd take Barkley over him to be honest.
Why, what kind of player is Barkley?
Which makes it weird why somebody would want him if they don't want playmakers. Especially if you ignore the massive difference in the two as players.A no.10, not like your Silva's, more of strong runner, extremely talented though. Some think long term he'll be a CM, not convinced myself.
I think Fabregas would be the perfect signing. I like Kroos, but I would prefer Fabregas.
Putting him along side a defensive minded midfielder would be excellent. I think Barca used him as a more advanced player, but in his time at Arsenal, he excelled in a central midfield role.
The thing is, Fabregas won't revolutionize the team on his own. He needs capable players around him aswell
We need some quality and pace on out wide, and somebody with could defensive positioning behind him
The proverbial grab the game by the scruff of the neck mids are rare. How many of them do you think are there and who among them are realistically gettable?
As far as am concerned, he's a top CM, isnt the kind of CM I want but given we need more than 1 anyways, he'l be a great addition. We should setup properly and play as a unit rather than hope for someone to grab the game individually and lead us to wins.
I want 11 fighters, no shrinking violets & we seem to going the other way. More knowledgeable people than me will know where these are to be found. Are they gettable? Well Fab wasn't gettable last summer but he appears to be now. McCarthy was & he's a fighter - different players of course but as you say, we're rebuilding a squad & I want fighters - the kind that made us so successful in the past.
Too many ballerinas will not get us back to the top & Fabregas, Januzaj, Mata & Kagawa, seems to mirror more Barcelona, than Madrid.
I can't imagine Arsenal would let it happen, they'd surely pay whatever was required in terms of fees/wages to prevent it, and they can obviously offer Champions League football, and the adoration he was accustomed to before he left for Barca. You'd obviously take him at United, but we shouldn't assume, even if it was somehow to happen, that we'd be getting the same Cesc that we saw at Arsenal.
Tony Adams famously said once that to win the league you need to have one player getting in a fight and then six to back him up if it got a bit hairy. Effectively you needed 7 "fighters" in the team.
He's gotten two teams relegated and now manages in Azerbaijan mind
The fact that Adams can't Manage does not equate to disproving my belief that a winning team is made up of fighters.
How many shrinking violets in the Liverpool side this season or at City or Chelsea? Sure the game has changed & there are few if any Roy Kean's out there but look at Sunderlands survival fight, led by Cattermole who, is a head case for sure but he's fighting every minute he's out there. Yes we need craft as well but there has to be large doses of both.
Why would Arsenal be bothered to prevent it?
It'd be an incredibly fecking stupid move for a club to pay £40m odd for a player they had no intention of bidding for until they found out we wanted him.
It'd be £25m for us - that's the buy-back clause.
You have an option to buy a player you sold for £35m, for £25m? Sounds legit.
It'd be £25m for us - that's the buy-back clause.