Rnd898
Full Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2022
- Messages
- 1,075
- Supports
- Chelsea
Has Gallagher been unavailable for sale multiple windows he was supposed to go due to injury?
Also, are the leverage positions even remotely the same? You can’t send this type of message to Gallagher, because he can just run his last year down. I don’t think he will, because he just can’t stand not playing. So sitting down with Gallagher and being straight about his playing time will be enough. They will probably settle a deal with Atleti.
If something happens to Chalobah, then that will be 3 windows of failed deals. And they already aren’t completely thrilled with with the turn them of offers. My guess, from the “must have European football” comments coming out, that Forest isn’t the only move he’s rejected; just the one we’ve found out about.
Keep in mind they were offering him for 25. 25m. I rate him more than that. Do I think he’s better than Desasi? Yes. But it’s Josh I see playing before Desasi long term, and we won’t get anyone to buy Desasi right now… and we can’t afford to have his full payment come due. But the club literally doesn’t rate Chalobah
What I don’t want is for it to drag on.
So basically your stance is that Chalobah should just 'know his place' and accept a move to a Forest or similar, despite genuinely not wanting to move and instead desperately hoping to stay and fight for playing time at Chelsea? Mind you Trev's got a contract till 2028, given to him by Boehly & Eghbali. He has every right to refuse offers if he doesn't consider them tempting enough to change his stance.
I can tell you're American by the way you talk about players like they're not even human beings rather than just pawns to be trafficked at the whim of these scumbag owners and directors. I actually wouldn't be surprised if the owners were genuinely surprised by the fact you can't actually trade players against their wishes in Europe due to the players having some basic human rights unlike over there in the states.