ha_rooney
Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2008
- Messages
- 39,511
SSN did say Spurs outbid Liverpool, what would that be then £15 million?
Why did Spurs want him? They already have Pienaar, Modric, Van Der Vaart, Palacios, Huddlestone and Jenas who can play in the middle. Were they bracing themselves for losing Modric in the summer by any chance?
Adam will replace Modric when we sign him in the summerI really didn't understand Spurs' bid. Parker and Phil Neville were understandable since they could do with another defensive minded midfielder (plus Phil would also give them an option for both fullback spots), but Adams would be pointless with the players they already have.
Spurs have to operate within the 25-man squad rule - within the age limits concerned - the same as everyone else.Its the Harry Redknapp way to buy excessive amounts of players to play in every position
Adam will replace Modric when we sign him in the summer![]()
I hope so. Well, the Modric bit anyway, I like Spurs so would hope they'd sign a better player than Adam to replace him. But Spurs definitely aren't planning on selling, so they wouldn't be looking to sign a replacement.Adam will replace Modric when we sign him in the summer![]()
Isn't his contract up in 2012?
Must be as it was never mentioned during all the transfer drama with Liverpool that he was out of contract in the summer.
Although it would explain why they bid so low for him
Wouldn't they have taken £6.5M rather than lose him for nothing though? plus it seems odd that it was never mentioned in the media during the window.
Ian Holloway says Adam can leave but only for the right price | Football | The Guardian"Charlie is our captain and best player – I have never had anyone as good as him, anywhere – and he has 18 months left on his contract. So if Liverpool want him now, instead of waiting until summer when it would be easier for us, they have to pay a fair price, a price that reflects the loss to us. That's the way my chairman sees it and if Liverpool don't do things correctly he will dig his heels in."
Not if it means they get relegated and lose a lot more money
And the media are idiots. Obviously.
I think thats the official blackpool site I just quoted from? Might not be.
It could well be that he's already agreed to a third year and took up that option - but if he hasnt, and I havent heard anything about him doing that, then he's not going to do it now thats for sure.
Alternatively sometimes its the club that decides on the extra year - maybe thats the case
If there is an "option" of a third year that will usually be for the club, rather than the player to decide. They've probably taken that option already.
He's not out of contract in the summer. Why else would any club bid for him.
Wouldn't they have taken £6.5M rather than lose him for nothing though? plus it seems odd that it was never mentioned in the media during the window.
Plenty of clubs buy players out of contract in the summer.
Regarding the extra year, even if its the club's choice - surely the player has to also agree to it? Or is there nothing for him to sign at that point?
He will be ours in the summer according to the timse and radio.
And we have money to spend?
Convinced its bullshit.
Great player, has single handedly kept Blackpool within a chance of staying in the EPL. How much would he be going for?
Not as good as Scott Parker this season though, despite the fact that he's scored more, created more, plays with worse players AND has actually kept his team up. That award is just a giant joke![]()
scott parker has great hair whereas adam is a fat ugly fecker.