So Inter are 24 points behind the league leaders, Madrid are 13 points behind the league leaders and the two could potentially face off to be the best team in Europe. Lets assume Inter do win, having finish 25-30 points off the pace in their country and potentially not even be the best team in their city. Can we really call them the best team in Europe? Cups are rather interesting formats.
Also, does anyone know what's the worst (yes, I'm aware Madrid are a fantastic CL team) two finalists in a European final (in terms of combined points off the top of their respective league tables?)
-UCL winners are the best teams.
-League winners are the most consistent, not the best.
In the UCL, you go full throttle almost every single game, and even more in the knockout stages, where teams give all they have.
In the League, its about consistency, the top team who manages to not be lazy or too overconfident in most games, is the one than wins it.
Real Madrid losing points to Getafe, Elche, Valladolid and Celta doesn't means they are worse, there are much factors throughout 38 games that can decide the league. Or does anyone believe is Madrid played all that games like they play in UCL knockout stages, they would lose all that points?
Is Barcelona a better team than Madrid? A team that went out of UCL early for losing both games vs Inter Milan and both games vs Bayern? Then being easily knocked out from Europa by Man Utd?
Their current difference on the League demonstrates this point exactly. Barca are more consistent vs average or below par teams, but can't manage to defeat top European teams, not in UCL or Europa League. Real Madrid on the other hand tends to play in first gear a lot being overconfident in the league, losing a lot of points vs average teams, but when it matters vs the best teams in the world, they always win.